BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

685 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32050225)

  • 1. Assessment of the accuracy of new and updated intraocular lens power calculation formulas in 10 930 eyes from the UK National Health Service.
    Darcy K; Gunn D; Tavassoli S; Sparrow J; Kane JX
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Jan; 46(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 32050225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraocular lens formula comparison in axial hyperopia with a high-power intraocular lens of 30 or more diopters.
    Kane JX; Melles RB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1236-1239. PubMed ID: 32384418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the accuracy of 11 intraocular lens power calculation formulas.
    Carmona-González D; Castillo-Gómez A; Palomino-Bautista C; Romero-Domínguez M; Gutiérrez-Moreno MÁ
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 31(5):2370-2376. PubMed ID: 33054421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative analysis of 12 intraocular lens power formulas.
    Pereira A; Popovic MM; Ahmed Y; Lloyd JC; El-Defrawy S; Gorfinkel J; Schlenker MB
    Int Ophthalmol; 2021 Dec; 41(12):4137-4150. PubMed ID: 34318369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Refractive Predictability Using the IOLMaster 700 and Artificial Intelligence-Based IOL Power Formulas Compared to Standard Formulas.
    Cheng H; Kane JX; Liu L; Li J; Cheng B; Wu M
    J Refract Surg; 2020 Jul; 36(7):466-472. PubMed ID: 32644169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of IOL Power Calculation Formulas for a Trifocal IOL in Eyes With High Myopia.
    Tan Q; Lin D; Wang L; Chen B; Tang Q; Chen X; Chen M; Tan J; Zhang J; Wu L; Zhu X; Wang Y
    J Refract Surg; 2021 Aug; 37(8):538-544. PubMed ID: 34388073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of six methods for the intraocular lens power calculation in high myopic eyes.
    Ji J; Liu Y; Zhang J; Wu X; Shao W; Ma B; Luo M
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jan; 31(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 31744328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of ocular biometric factors on the accuracy of various IOL power calculation formulas.
    Jeong J; Song H; Lee JK; Chuck RS; Kwon JW
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 May; 17(1):62. PubMed ID: 28464806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 26.0 mm: comparison of formulas and methods.
    Abulafia A; Barrett GD; Rotenberg M; Kleinmann G; Levy A; Reitblat O; Koch DD; Wang L; Assia EI
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 41(3):548-56. PubMed ID: 25708208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Formulas Modified for Patients with Keratoconus.
    Kane JX; Connell B; Yip H; McAlister JC; Beckingsale P; Snibson GR; Chan E
    Ophthalmology; 2020 Aug; 127(8):1037-1042. PubMed ID: 32279887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas in cataract patients with steep corneal curvature.
    Zhang C; Dai G; Pazo EE; Xu L; Wu X; Zhang H; Lin T; He W
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0241630. PubMed ID: 33216749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in Chinese eyes with axial myopia.
    Liu J; Wang L; Chai F; Han Y; Qian S; Koch DD; Weikert MP
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Jun; 45(6):725-731. PubMed ID: 31146930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraocular lens power calculation formula accuracy: Comparison of 12 formulas for a trifocal hydrophilic intraocular lens.
    Rocha-de-Lossada C; Colmenero-Reina E; Flikier D; Castro-Alonso FJ; Rodriguez-Raton A; García-Madrona JL; Peraza-Nieves J; Sánchez-González JM
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Nov; 31(6):2981-2988. PubMed ID: 33339479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of formula accuracy for intraocular lens power calculation based on measurements by a swept-source optical coherence tomography optical biometer.
    Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Balducci N; Barboni P; Schiano-Lomoriello D
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Jan; 46(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 32050229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of 9 modern intraocular lens power calculation formulas for a quadrifocal intraocular lens.
    Shajari M; Kolb CM; Petermann K; Böhm M; Herzog M; de'Lorenzo N; Schönbrunn S; Kohnen T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2018 Aug; 44(8):942-948. PubMed ID: 30115296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of anterior chamber depth on the choice of intraocular lens calculation formula in patients with normal axial length.
    Miraftab M; Hashemi H; Fotouhi A; Khabazkhoob M; Rezvan F; Asgari S
    Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2014; 21(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 25371635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of the refractive prediction determined by intraocular lens power calculation formulas in high myopia.
    Zhou D; Sun Z; Deng G
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 67(4):484-489. PubMed ID: 30900579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Alternative method of intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with short axial length].
    Belov DF; Nikolaenko VP
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2022; 138(3):24-28. PubMed ID: 35801876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of segmented optical axial length on the performance of intraocular lens power calculation formulas.
    Goto S; Maeda N; Ohnuma K; Lawu T; Ogawa K; Sugiyama S; Matsumaru M; Noda T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2024 May; 50(5):492-497. PubMed ID: 38237070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Algorithmic intraocular lens power calculation formula selection by keratometry, anterior chamber depth and axial length.
    Kim JW; Eom Y; Yoon EG; Choi Y; Song JS; Jeong JW; Park SK; Kim HM
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 100(3):e701-e709. PubMed ID: 34378871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.