These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3205049)

  • 1. Uncertainty and medical authority in the world of Jay Katz.
    Burt RA
    Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(3-4):190-6. PubMed ID: 3205049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In re A.C.
    Bourke LH
    Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 2279918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Foreclosing the use of force: A.C. reversed.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(4):27-9. PubMed ID: 2211083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consent, compulsion and the rights of the mother and unborn child.
    Dimond B
    Midwives Chron; 1986 Apr; 99(1179):78-80. PubMed ID: 2939328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enforced caesarean section: a US appeal.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1990 May; 335(8700):1270. PubMed ID: 1971334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Court-ordered cesareans--choice or control?
    Rowan C
    Nurs Ethics; 1998 Nov; 5(6):542-4. PubMed ID: 9856072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health care law ... focus on consent.
    Health Care Anal; 1993 Jun; 1(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 10134360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. But she's not an "inanimate container...".
    Mishkin B
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(3):40-2. PubMed ID: 3397279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informed consent: from the ambivalence of Arato to the thunder of Thor.
    Arabian A
    Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(3):261-98. PubMed ID: 7829305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Court-ordered cesarean sections. A judicial standard for resolving the conflict between fetal interests and maternal rights.
    Noble-Allgire AM
    J Leg Med; 1989 Mar; 10(1):211-49. PubMed ID: 2651546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When rights collide: parents, children, and consent to treatment.
    Plotkin R
    J Pediatr Psychol; 1981 Jun; 6(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 7252718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maternal-fetal conflicts. Ethical and legal implications for nurse-midwives.
    King NM
    J Nurse Midwifery; 1991; 36(6):361-5. PubMed ID: 1757822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Informed consent: patient rights and the doctor's duty of disclosure in South Africa.
    van Oosten FF
    Med Law; 1989; 7(5):443-56. PubMed ID: 2493551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Court-ordered cesarean sections: an example of the dangers of judicial involvement in medical decision making.
    Stanyer BT
    Gonzaga Law Rev; 1992-1993; 28(1):121-40. PubMed ID: 11654037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maternal versus fetal rights--a clinical dilemma.
    Shriner TL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Apr; 53(4):518-9. PubMed ID: 440658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Truce on the battlefield: a proposal for a different approach to medical informed consent.
    Piper A
    J Law Med Ethics; 1994; 22(4):301-13; discussion 314-7. PubMed ID: 7767407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contemporary transatlantic developments concerning compelled medical treatment of pregnant women.
    Rossiter GP
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 May; 35(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 7677674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forcible caesarean: a new direction in British maternity care? Thoughts on the case of Mrs S.
    Crafter H
    Nurs Ethics; 1994 Mar; 1(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 7828056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Silent decisions: limits of consent and the terminally ill patient.
    Brennan TA
    Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(3-4):204-9. PubMed ID: 3205051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lost in a doctrinal wasteland: the exceptionalism of doctor-patient speech within the Rehnquist Court's First Amendment jurisprudence.
    Berg PE
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1998; 8(2):153-77. PubMed ID: 10182216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.