These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32051319)

  • 1. Patient priorities in relation to surgery for gastric cancer: qualitative interviews with gastric cancer surgery patients to inform the development of a core outcome set.
    Alkhaffaf B; Blazeby JM; Bruce IA; Morris RL
    BMJ Open; 2020 Feb; 10(2):e034782. PubMed ID: 32051319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Standardising the reporting of outcomes in gastric cancer surgery trials: protocol for the development of a core outcome set and accompanying outcome measurement instrument set (the GASTROS study).
    Alkhaffaf B; Glenny AM; Blazeby JM; Williamson P; Bruce IA
    Trials; 2017 Aug; 18(1):370. PubMed ID: 28793921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How are trial outcomes prioritised by stakeholders from different regions? Analysis of an international Delphi survey to develop a core outcome set in gastric cancer surgery.
    Alkhaffaf B; Metryka A; Blazeby JM; Glenny AM; Williamson PR; Bruce IA;
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261937. PubMed ID: 34972165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reporting of outcomes in gastric cancer surgery trials: a systematic review.
    Alkhaffaf B; Blazeby JM; Williamson PR; Bruce IA; Glenny AM
    BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e021796. PubMed ID: 30337308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Participating in core outcome set development via Delphi surveys: qualitative interviews provide pointers to inform guidance.
    Biggane AM; Williamson PR; Ravaud P; Young B
    BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e032338. PubMed ID: 31727660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Core outcome set for surgical trials in gastric cancer (GASTROS study): international patient and healthcare professional consensus.
    Alkhaffaf B; Metryka A; Blazeby JM; Glenny AM; Adeyeye A; Costa PM; Diez Del Val I; Gisbertz SS; Guner A; Law S; Lee HJ; Li Z; Nakada K; Reim D; Vorwald P; Baiocchi GL; Allum W; Chaudry MA; Griffiths EA; Williamson PR; Bruce IA
    Br J Surg; 2021 Jun; 108(10):1216-24. PubMed ID: 34165555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The AMBER care bundle for hospital inpatients with uncertain recovery nearing the end of life: the ImproveCare feasibility cluster RCT.
    Koffman J; Yorganci E; Murtagh F; Yi D; Gao W; Barclay S; Pickles A; Higginson I; Johnson H; Wilson R; Bailey S; Ewart C; Evans C
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Oct; 23(55):1-150. PubMed ID: 31594555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes of physiotherapy for people living with bronchiectasis: qualitative study to inform development of a core outcome set.
    Hamzeh H; Kelly C; Spencer S
    Physiotherapy; 2023 Dec; 121():37-45. PubMed ID: 37812851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A real-time electronic symptom monitoring system for patients after discharge following surgery: a pilot study in cancer-related surgery.
    Richards HS; Blazeby JM; Portal A; Harding R; Reed T; Lander T; Chalmers KA; Carter R; Singhal R; Absolom K; Velikova G; Avery KNL
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Jun; 20(1):543. PubMed ID: 32522163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a core outcome set for orthodontic trials using a mixed-methods approach: protocol for a multicentre study.
    Tsichlaki A; O'Brien K; Johal A; Marshman Z; Benson P; Colonio Salazar FB; Fleming PS
    Trials; 2017 Aug; 18(1):366. PubMed ID: 28778170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physical recovery in the first six months following oesophago-gastric cancer surgery. Identifying rehabilitative needs: a qualitative interview study.
    O'Neill L; Bennett AE; Guinan E; Reynolds JV; Hussey J
    Disabil Rehabil; 2021 May; 43(10):1396-1403. PubMed ID: 31524528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving core outcome set development: qualitative interviews with developers provided pointers to inform guidance.
    Gargon E; Williamson PR; Young B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():140-152. PubMed ID: 28495644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: A qualitative study to inform a Core Outcome Set.
    Spooner C; Vivat B; White N; Stone P
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(7):e0306717. PubMed ID: 38990836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term views on chronic kidney disease research priorities among stakeholders engaged in a priority-setting partnership: A qualitative study.
    Elliott MJ; Sale JEM; Goodarzi Z; Wilhelm L; Laupacis A; Hemmelgarn BR; Straus SE
    Health Expect; 2018 Dec; 21(6):1142-1149. PubMed ID: 30112819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality of life: A critical outcome for all surgical treatments of gastric cancer.
    McCall MD; Graham PJ; Bathe OF
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Jan; 22(3):1101-13. PubMed ID: 26811650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extensive peritoneal lavage with saline after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer (EXPEL): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Yang HK; Ji J; Han SU; Terashima M; Li G; Kim HH; Law S; Shabbir A; Song KY; Hyung WJ; Kosai NR; Kono K; Misawa K; Yabusaki H; Kinoshita T; Lau PC; Kim YW; Rao JR; Ng E; Yamada T; Yoshida K; Park DJ; Tai BC; So JBY;
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Feb; 6(2):120-127. PubMed ID: 33253659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgical care quality and oncologic outcome after D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
    Mrena J; Mattila A; Böhm J; Jantunen I; Kellokumpu I
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Dec; 21(47):13294-301. PubMed ID: 26715812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Core outcome set for research studies evaluating treatments for twin-twin transfusion syndrome.
    Perry H; Duffy JMN; Reed K; Baschat A; Deprest J; Hecher K; Lewi L; Lopriore E; Oepkes D; Khalil A;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 54(2):255-261. PubMed ID: 30520170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for pelvic girdle pain, including methods for measuring the outcomes: the PGP-COS study.
    Wuytack F; Gutke A; Stuge B; Mørkved S; Olsson C; Robinson HS; Vøllestad NK; Öberg B; Wikmar LN; Mena JJS; Smith V
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):158. PubMed ID: 30509216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in inflammatory bowel disease: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey.
    Ma C; Panaccione R; Fedorak RN; Parker CE; Khanna R; Levesque BG; Sandborn WJ; Feagan BG; Jairath V
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jun; 7(6):e016146. PubMed ID: 28601837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.