These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. A consistency evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio in the quality assessment of human brain magnetic resonance images. Yu S; Dai G; Wang Z; Li L; Wei X; Xie Y BMC Med Imaging; 2018 May; 18(1):17. PubMed ID: 29769079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Signal-to-noise ratio and section thickness in two-dimensional versus three-dimensional Fourier transform MR imaging. Carlson J; Crooks L; Ortendahl D; Kramer DM; Kaufman L Radiology; 1988 Jan; 166(1 Pt 1):266-70. PubMed ID: 3336691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An unbiased signal-to-noise ratio measure for magnetic resonance images. McGibney G; Smith MR Med Phys; 1993; 20(4):1077-8. PubMed ID: 8413015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Signal-to-noise ratio evaluation of magnetic resonance images in the presence of an ultrasonic motor. Shokrollahi P; Drake JM; Goldenberg AA Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Apr; 16(1):45. PubMed ID: 28410615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Validity of the Signal-to-noise Ratio Measurement Method for MRI Using a Phase Image]. Shimizu K; Yamatani Y; Nogi A; Okamoto T Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2015 Aug; 71(8):678-84. PubMed ID: 26289980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas at 3.0 tesla: qualitative and quantitative comparison with 1.5 tesla. Edelman RR; Salanitri G; Brand R; Dunkle E; Ragin A; Li W; Mehta U; Berlin J; Newmark G; Gore R; Patel B; Carillo A; Vu A Invest Radiol; 2006 Feb; 41(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 16428989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes in signal-to-noise ratios and contrast-to-noise ratios of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas on ferucarbotran-enhanced dynamic MR imaging. Park Y; Choi D; Kim SH; Kim SH; Kim MJ; Lee J; Lim JH; Lee WJ; Lim HK Eur J Radiol; 2006 Sep; 59(3):424-31. PubMed ID: 16920312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Post-processing noise removal algorithm for magnetic resonance imaging based on edge detection and wavelet analysis. Placidi G; Alecci M; Sotgiu A Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jul; 48(13):1987-95. PubMed ID: 12884930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved detectability in low signal-to-noise ratio magnetic resonance images by means of a phase-corrected real reconstruction. Bernstein MA; Thomasson DM; Perman WH Med Phys; 1989; 16(5):813-7. PubMed ID: 2811764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maximum-likelihood estimation of Rician distribution parameters. Sijbers J; den Dekker AJ; Scheunders P; Van Dyck D IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Jun; 17(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 9735899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adaptive averaging for improved SNR in real-time coronary artery MRI. Sussman MS; Robert N; Wright GA IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Aug; 23(8):1034-45. PubMed ID: 15338736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Consideration on SNR in Synthetic MRI]. Ikeda A; Yoshikawa K Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2019; 75(2):160-166. PubMed ID: 30787222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-SNR multiple T Eo T; Kim T; Jun Y; Lee H; Ahn SS; Kim DH; Hwang D J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jun; 45(6):1835-1845. PubMed ID: 27635526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of echo spacing and readout bandwidth on basic performances of EPI-fMRI acquisition sequences implemented on two 1.5 T MR scanner systems. Giannelli M; Diciotti S; Tessa C; Mascalchi M Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):303-10. PubMed ID: 20175493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A nonlocal maximum likelihood estimation method for Rician noise reduction in MR images. He L; Greenshields IR IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Feb; 28(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 19188105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]