238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32052346)
1. Cross-modal psychological refractory period in vision, audition, and haptics.
Rau PP; Zheng J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1573-1585. PubMed ID: 32052346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual Dominance Effect upon Passing the Central Bottleneck of Information Processing.
Yao XQ; Yang YQ; Chen SY; Sun W; Chen Q
Chin Med J (Engl); 2018 Aug; 131(16):1926-1935. PubMed ID: 30082523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Central interference in driving: is there any stopping the psychological refractory period?
Levy J; Pashler H; Boer E
Psychol Sci; 2006 Mar; 17(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 16507063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dual-task interference and response strategies in simulated car driving: impact of first-task characteristics on the psychological refractory period effect.
Bock O; Wechsler K; Koch I; Schubert T
Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):568-576. PubMed ID: 31776662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A shared cortical bottleneck underlying Attentional Blink and Psychological Refractory Period.
Marti S; Sigman M; Dehaene S
Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2883-98. PubMed ID: 21988891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tri-modal integration of visual, tactile and auditory signals for the perception of sequences of events.
Bresciani JP; Dammeier F; Ernst MO
Brain Res Bull; 2008 Apr; 75(6):753-60. PubMed ID: 18394521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A startling acoustic stimulus interferes with upcoming motor preparation: Evidence for a startle refractory period.
Maslovat D; Chua R; Carlsen AN; May C; Forgaard CJ; Franks IM
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jun; 158():36-42. PubMed ID: 25919668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Signal reliability modulates auditory-tactile integration for event counting.
Bresciani JP; Ernst MO
Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(11):1157-61. PubMed ID: 17589318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. When audition dominates vision: evidence from cross-modal statistical learning.
Robinson CW; Sloutsky VM
Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 23047918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Concurrent deployment of visual attention and response selection bottleneck in a dual-task: Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence.
Reimer CB; Strobach T; Schubert T
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2460-2477. PubMed ID: 27734768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A psychological refractory period in access to visual short-term memory and the deployment of visual-spatial attention: multitasking processing deficits revealed by event-related potentials.
Brisson B; Jolicoeur P
Psychophysiology; 2007 Mar; 44(2):323-33. PubMed ID: 17343714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditory and tactile signals combine to influence vision during binocular rivalry.
Lunghi C; Morrone MC; Alais D
J Neurosci; 2014 Jan; 34(3):784-92. PubMed ID: 24431437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vision and Haptics Share Spatial Attentional Resources and Visuotactile Integration Is Not Affected by High Attentional Load.
Wahn B; König P
Multisens Res; 2015; 28(3-4):371-92. PubMed ID: 26288905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities.
Lange K; Röder B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):715-29. PubMed ID: 16768372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Brain mechanisms of serial and parallel processing during dual-task performance.
Sigman M; Dehaene S
J Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 28(30):7585-98. PubMed ID: 18650336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multisession, dual-task psychological refractory period practice benefits older and younger adults equally.
Allen PA; Ruthruff E; Elicker JD; Lien MC
Exp Aging Res; 2009 Oct; 35(4):369-99. PubMed ID: 20183098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dual route for subtask order control: Evidence from the psychological refractory paradigm.
Luria R; Meiran N
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr; 59(4):720-44. PubMed ID: 16707359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of stimulus modality on the processing of conflicting sensory information during response inhibition.
Friedrich J; Beste C
Neuroscience; 2019 Jul; 410():191-201. PubMed ID: 31100340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mutual influences of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion and auditory motion with uncrossed and crossed arms.
Jiang Y; Chen L
Multisens Res; 2013; 26(1-2):19-51. PubMed ID: 23713198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
