These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3205242)

  • 1. Registered care technologists.
    Trowbridge GL
    Neonatal Netw; 1988 Dec; 7(3):51-4. PubMed ID: 3205242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. RCTs: not the answer to the nursing shortage.
    Frels LM; Straub LA; Goldsteen RL
    Nurs Econ; 1989; 7(3):136-41. PubMed ID: 2761648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facts about nursing 84-85.
    ANA Publ; 1985 Jun; (D-84):i-viii, 1-315. PubMed ID: 3849267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Registered care technologists: the ANA response.
    Neonatal Netw; 1988 Aug; 7(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 3405188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Registered care technologists: a case of medical myopia.
    Alspach JG
    Crit Care Nurse; 1989 Oct; 9(9):2, 10. PubMed ID: 2805766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Registered care technologists: the AMA proposal.
    Neonatal Netw; 1988 Aug; 7(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 3405192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are registered care technologists (RCT's) the answer?
    Parker MS
    Insight; 1989 Feb; 14(1):8. PubMed ID: 2522489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NHNA Position Paper on the AMA proposal to create registered care technologists.
    Nurs News; 1988 Aug; 39(4):12. PubMed ID: 3412916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. North Carolina Nurses Association Position Statement: response to AMA proposal for registered care technologists.
    Tar Heel Nurse; 1988; 50(4):3-4. PubMed ID: 3175919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Registered care technologists: is the AMA's answer to shortage viable?
    McCluskey JA
    Pa Nurse; 1988 Aug; 43(8):3, 5, 12-3. PubMed ID: 3412777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Debate over Registered Care Technologists: nurses angry, opposed to AMA proposal.
    Tex Nurs; 1988; 62(6):6, 8. PubMed ID: 3413700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nurses oppose American Medical Association's proposal: AMA's proposal.
    Turner E
    Ky Nurse; 1988; 36(3):11. PubMed ID: 3386284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Kansas State Nurses' Association response and analysis of the AMA'S proposal to prepare registered care technologists and advanced registered care technologists.
    Kans Nurse; 1988 Aug; 63(8):6-7. PubMed ID: 3172630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Basic care-givers American style. Statement on the proper use of assistive personnel to the registered nurse.
    N Z Nurs J; 1991 Feb; 84(1):15. PubMed ID: 1997911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nursing rationale for opposing the registered care technologist: Fact Sheet 7/88.
    Imprint; 1988 Nov; 35(4):23. PubMed ID: 3192248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Registered care technicians: a roundtable discussion.
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1990 Feb; 79(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 2303759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nurses oppose AMA proposal for minimally trained technologists.
    S D Nurse; 1988 Aug; 30(3):4-5. PubMed ID: 3175677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Registered care technologist.
    Provencher H
    Can Nurse; 1989 Oct; 85(9):27-8. PubMed ID: 2790722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What about Registered Care Technicians?
    McGuckin-Smith N
    Hawaii Nurses Pipeline; 1988 Aug; 29(7):1. PubMed ID: 3417325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. From the President. AMA registered care technologist proposal.
    Lonsway RA
    J Intraven Nurs; 1988; 11(6):363-4. PubMed ID: 3204444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.