124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32052746)
21. [History of articles in medical radiation dosimetry and protection--looking back the transition from analog radiography to digital radiography].
Mizutani H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Dec; 70(12):1487-95. PubMed ID: 25672454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Optimising default radiographic exposure factors using Deviation Index.
Creeden A; Curtis M
Radiography (Lond); 2020 Nov; 26(4):308-313. PubMed ID: 32199801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography.
Lewis S; Pieterse T; Lawrence H
J Med Radiat Sci; 2019 Mar; 66(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 30834686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Analysis of dosage loads on patients and personnel in the use of "FSTs-U-01" x-ray image-enhanced fluorography].
Vladimirov LV; Kanter BM
Med Tekh; 2002; (3):18-21. PubMed ID: 12224245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Some aspects on radiation protection in conventional and digital radiology in Romania.
Milu C; Dumitrescu A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):346-9. PubMed ID: 18381334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: radiation dose optimization.
Geijer H; Verdonck B; Beckman KW; Andersson T; Persliden J
Eur Radiol; 2003 Mar; 13(3):543-51. PubMed ID: 12594558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A MONTE-CARLO SIMULATION FRAMEWORK FOR JOINT OPTIMISATION OF IMAGE QUALITY AND PATIENT DOSE IN DIGITAL PAEDIATRIC RADIOGRAPHY.
Menser B; Manke D; Mentrup D; Neitzel U
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):371-7. PubMed ID: 26628612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A Standardized Exposure Index for Digital Radiography.
Brake DA
Radiol Technol; 2016 May; 87(5):581-5. PubMed ID: 27146186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The role of digital technologies to decrease the radiation exposure from X-ray diagnostics to the population of Ukraine.
Kovalenko Y; Miroshnychenko S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):98-9. PubMed ID: 20223851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Image gently: using exposure indicators to improve pediatric digital radiography.
Moore QT; Don S; Goske MJ; Strauss KJ; Cohen M; Herrmann T; Macdougall R; Noble L; Morrison G; John SD; Lehman L
Radiol Technol; 2012; 84(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 22988269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Factors to consider in the transition to digital radiological imaging.
MacDonald D
J Ir Dent Assoc; 2009; 55(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 19301520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Strategies for dose reduction in ordinary radiographic examinations using CR and DR.
Willis CE
Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S196-200; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Commissioning and constancy protocols for digital angiographic units.
Tsapaki V; Padovani R; Vano E; Schreiner A; Molfetas M; Neofotistou V; Kottou S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):258-60. PubMed ID: 18245790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quality assurance in dental radiography: intra-oral image quality analysis.
Bolas A; Fitzgerald M
J Ir Dent Assoc; 2008 Dec-2009 Jan; 54(6):274-8. PubMed ID: 19189748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Does digital imaging decrease patient dose? A pilot study and review of the literature.
Neofotistou V; Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Schreiner-Karoussou A; Vano E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):204-10. PubMed ID: 16464833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ultra-high pitch chest computed tomography at 70 kVp tube voltage in an anthropomorphic pediatric phantom and non-sedated pediatric patients: Initial experience with 3
Hagelstein C; Henzler T; Haubenreisser H; Meyer M; Sudarski S; Schoenberg SO; Neff KW; Weis M
Z Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 26(4):349-361. PubMed ID: 26702762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Beware the mask.
Shields E; Bushong SC
J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Feb; 10(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 23374695
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
Huda W
Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
