These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32052746)

  • 41. [Dose reduction of radiographs of the pediatric pelvis for diagnosing hip dysplasia using a digital flat-panel detector system].
    Ludwig K; Ahlers K; Sandmann C; Gosheger G; Kloska S; Vieth V; Meier N; Heindel W
    Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 12525991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Dosimetric characteristics of a slotted digital x-ray unit as a device with reduced radiation exposure].
    Stavitskiĭ RV; Mishkinis BIa; Volobuev AI; Denisov PI; Lapina TV
    Med Tekh; 1989; (2):23-6. PubMed ID: 2747495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Radiation protection guidelines for the practicing orthodontist.
    Mupparapu M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):168-72; discussion 172. PubMed ID: 16102399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Lonizing radiation regulations and the dental practitioner: 3. Quality assurance in dental radiography.
    Rout J; Brown J
    Dent Update; 2012 Jun; 39(5):334-6, 338-9. PubMed ID: 22852511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. New exposure indicators for digital radiography simplified for radiologists and technologists.
    Don S; Whiting BR; Rutz LJ; Apgar BK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1337-41. PubMed ID: 23169727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Dose efficiency of screen-film systems used in pediatric radiography.
    Cohen G; Wagner LK; McDaniel DL; Robinson LH
    Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):187-93. PubMed ID: 6729110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Dental assistants' guide to radiation protection course--part 2.
    Stirling GC
    Ont Dent; 1983 Dec; 60(12):14-6, 18-20, 22. PubMed ID: 6585767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. During My Residency, I Learned That the Patient Radiation Dose in Fluoroscopy Depended on Field Size. Now, With Digital Units, the Vendor Says It Does Not. Is That True?
    Behrman RH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Dec; 207(6):W106-W107. PubMed ID: 27611232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Digital radiography: the balance between image quality and required radiation dose.
    Uffmann M; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 19628349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. An Interdisciplinary Approach to Improving Radiation Protection in Digital Radiography.
    Moore QT
    Radiol Technol; 2016 Sep; 88(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 27601688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Update on the biological effects of ionizing radiation, relative dose factors and radiation hygiene.
    White SC; Mallya SM
    Aust Dent J; 2012 Mar; 57 Suppl 1():2-8. PubMed ID: 22376091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Management of pediatric radiation dose using GE's Revolution digital radiography systems.
    Jabri KN; Uppaluri R; Xue P
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S215-20; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Tube potential and CT radiation dose optimization.
    Lira D; Padole A; Kalra MK; Singh S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):W4-10. PubMed ID: 25539272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Digital radiography: are the manufacturers' settings too high? Optimisation of the Kodak digital radiography system with aid of the computed radiography dose index.
    Peters SE; Brennan PC
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Sep; 12(9):2381-7. PubMed ID: 12195499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation.
    Geijer H; Beckman K; Jonsson B; Andersson T; Persliden J
    Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):402-10. PubMed ID: 11161153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of a flat panel digital radiographic system for low-dose portable imaging of neonates.
    Samei E; Hill JG; Frey GD; Southgate WM; Mah E; Delong D
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):601-7. PubMed ID: 12722812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Significant dose reduction for pediatric digital subtraction angiography without impairing image quality: preclinical study in a piglet model.
    Racadio J; Strauss K; Abruzzo T; Patel M; Kukreja K; Johnson N; den Hartog M; Hoornaert B; Nachabe R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):904-8. PubMed ID: 25247959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
    Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The Image Gently pediatric digital radiography safety checklist: tools for improving pediatric radiography.
    John SD; Moore QT; Herrmann T; Don S; Powers K; Smith SN; Morrison G; Charkot E; Mills TT; Rutz L; Goske MJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Oct; 10(10):781-8. PubMed ID: 24091048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.