BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32052770)

  • 1. The accuracy of Cobb angle measurement on CT scan projection radiograph images.
    Alrehily F; Hogg P; Twiste M; Johansen S; Tootell A
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):e73-e77. PubMed ID: 32052770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of added fat on the accuracy of Cobb angle measurements in CT SPR images: A phantom study.
    Alrehily F; Alanezi A; Alsady G; Benqlilou M; Carlos L; Smit C; Snetler L; Coward J
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Oct; 26 Suppl 2():S88-S93. PubMed ID: 32340911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scoliosis imaging: An analysis of radiation risk in the CT scan projection radiograph and a comparison with projection radiography and EOS.
    Alrehily F; Hogg P; Twiste M; Johansen S; Tootell A
    Radiography (Lond); 2019 Aug; 25(3):e68-e74. PubMed ID: 31301794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and validation of a bespoke phantom to test accuracy of Cobb angle measurements.
    Alrehily F; Hogg P; Twiste M; Johansen S; Tootell A
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):e78-e87. PubMed ID: 32052769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy on the preoperative assessment of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using biplanar low-dose stereoradiography: a comparison with computed tomography.
    Yeung KH; Man GCW; Lam TP; Ng BKW; Cheng JCY; Chu WCW
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Aug; 21(1):558. PubMed ID: 32811481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 3D ultrasound imaging provides reliable angle measurement with validity comparable to X-ray in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Lee TT; Lai KK; Cheng JC; Castelein RM; Lam TP; Zheng YP
    J Orthop Translat; 2021 Jul; 29():51-59. PubMed ID: 34094858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A reliability and validity study for Scolioscan: a radiation-free scoliosis assessment system using 3D ultrasound imaging.
    Zheng YP; Lee TT; Lai KK; Yip BH; Zhou GQ; Jiang WW; Cheung JC; Wong MS; Ng BK; Cheng JC; Lam TP
    Scoliosis Spinal Disord; 2016; 11():13. PubMed ID: 27299162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability analysis of Cobb angle measurements of congenital scoliosis using X-ray and 3D-CT images.
    Tauchi R; Tsuji T; Cahill PJ; Flynn JM; Flynn JM; Glotzbecker M; El-Hawary R; Heflin JA; Imagama S; Joshi AP; Nohara A; Ramirez N; Roye DP; Saito T; Sawyer JR; Smith JT; Kawakami N
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 26377663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A reliability and validity study for different coronal angles using ultrasound imaging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Brink RC; Wijdicks SPJ; Tromp IN; Schlösser TPC; Kruyt MC; Beek FJA; Castelein RM
    Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):979-985. PubMed ID: 29056566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is There Asymmetry Between the Concave and Convex Pedicles in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis? A CT Investigation.
    Davis CM; Grant CA; Pearcy MJ; Askin GN; Labrom RD; Izatt MT; Adam CJ; Little JP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):884-893. PubMed ID: 27900714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of spinal curvature parameters as determined by the ZEBRIS spine examination method and the Cobb method in children with scoliosis.
    Takács M; Orlovits Z; Jáger B; Kiss RM
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200245. PubMed ID: 29985957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spinal phantom comparability study of Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis using digital radiographic imaging.
    Chung N; Cheng YH; Po HL; Ng WK; Cheung KC; Yung HY; Lai YM
    J Orthop Translat; 2018 Oct; 15():81-90. PubMed ID: 30533384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variability in Cobb angle measurements using reformatted computerized tomography scans.
    Adam CJ; Izatt MT; Harvey JR; Askin GN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1664-9. PubMed ID: 16025038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional measurement of the Cobb angle in scoliosis.
    Lechner R; Putzer D; Dammerer D; Liebensteiner M; Bach C; Thaler M
    Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):957-962. PubMed ID: 27921155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Supine magnetic resonance imaging Cobb measurements for idiopathic scoliosis are linearly related to measurements from standing plain radiographs.
    Lee MC; Solomito M; Patel A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(11):E656-61. PubMed ID: 23429689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of 3-dimensional spinal reconstruction accuracy: biplanar radiographs with EOS versus computed tomography.
    Glaser DA; Doan J; Newton PO
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):1391-7. PubMed ID: 22415001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Supine to standing Cobb angle change in idiopathic scoliosis: the effect of endplate pre-selection.
    Keenan BE; Izatt MT; Askin GN; Labrom RD; Pearcy MJ; Adam CJ
    Scoliosis; 2014; 9():16. PubMed ID: 25342959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the Change in Axial Vertebral Rotation Following Thoracoscopic Anterior Scoliosis Surgery Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography.
    Little JP; Izatt MT; Adam CJ; Lofgren O; Sundberg A; Labrom RD; Askin GN
    Spine Deform; 2017 May; 5(3):172-180. PubMed ID: 28449960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The measurement of Cobb angle based on spine X-ray images using multi-scale convolutional neural network.
    Liu J; Yuan C; Sun X; Sun L; Dong H; Peng Y
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2021 Sep; 44(3):809-821. PubMed ID: 34251603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Nano-Dose Protocol For Cobb Angle Assessment in Children With Scoliosis: Results of a Phantom-based and Clinically Validated Study.
    Pedersen PH; Vergari C; Tran A; Xavier F; Jaeger A; Laboudie P; Housset V; Eiskjær SP; Vialle R
    Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Aug; 32(7):E340-E345. PubMed ID: 31162186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.