136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32052770)
1. The accuracy of Cobb angle measurement on CT scan projection radiograph images.
Alrehily F; Hogg P; Twiste M; Johansen S; Tootell A
Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):e73-e77. PubMed ID: 32052770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of added fat on the accuracy of Cobb angle measurements in CT SPR images: A phantom study.
Alrehily F; Alanezi A; Alsady G; Benqlilou M; Carlos L; Smit C; Snetler L; Coward J
Radiography (Lond); 2020 Oct; 26 Suppl 2():S88-S93. PubMed ID: 32340911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scoliosis imaging: An analysis of radiation risk in the CT scan projection radiograph and a comparison with projection radiography and EOS.
Alrehily F; Hogg P; Twiste M; Johansen S; Tootell A
Radiography (Lond); 2019 Aug; 25(3):e68-e74. PubMed ID: 31301794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and validation of a bespoke phantom to test accuracy of Cobb angle measurements.
Alrehily F; Hogg P; Twiste M; Johansen S; Tootell A
Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):e78-e87. PubMed ID: 32052769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy on the preoperative assessment of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using biplanar low-dose stereoradiography: a comparison with computed tomography.
Yeung KH; Man GCW; Lam TP; Ng BKW; Cheng JCY; Chu WCW
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Aug; 21(1):558. PubMed ID: 32811481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3D ultrasound imaging provides reliable angle measurement with validity comparable to X-ray in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Lee TT; Lai KK; Cheng JC; Castelein RM; Lam TP; Zheng YP
J Orthop Translat; 2021 Jul; 29():51-59. PubMed ID: 34094858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A reliability and validity study for Scolioscan: a radiation-free scoliosis assessment system using 3D ultrasound imaging.
Zheng YP; Lee TT; Lai KK; Yip BH; Zhou GQ; Jiang WW; Cheung JC; Wong MS; Ng BK; Cheng JC; Lam TP
Scoliosis Spinal Disord; 2016; 11():13. PubMed ID: 27299162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability analysis of Cobb angle measurements of congenital scoliosis using X-ray and 3D-CT images.
Tauchi R; Tsuji T; Cahill PJ; Flynn JM; Flynn JM; Glotzbecker M; El-Hawary R; Heflin JA; Imagama S; Joshi AP; Nohara A; Ramirez N; Roye DP; Saito T; Sawyer JR; Smith JT; Kawakami N
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 26377663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A reliability and validity study for different coronal angles using ultrasound imaging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Brink RC; Wijdicks SPJ; Tromp IN; Schlösser TPC; Kruyt MC; Beek FJA; Castelein RM
Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):979-985. PubMed ID: 29056566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is There Asymmetry Between the Concave and Convex Pedicles in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis? A CT Investigation.
Davis CM; Grant CA; Pearcy MJ; Askin GN; Labrom RD; Izatt MT; Adam CJ; Little JP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):884-893. PubMed ID: 27900714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of spinal curvature parameters as determined by the ZEBRIS spine examination method and the Cobb method in children with scoliosis.
Takács M; Orlovits Z; Jáger B; Kiss RM
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200245. PubMed ID: 29985957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. From 2D to 3D: automatic measurement of the Cobb angle in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with the weight-bearing 3D imaging.
Liang Z; Wang Q; Xia C; Chen Z; Xu M; Liang G; Yu Zhang ; Ye C; Zhang Y; Yu X; Wang H; Zheng H; Du J; Li Z; Tang J
Spine J; 2024 Jul; 24(7):1282-1292. PubMed ID: 38583576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spinal phantom comparability study of Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis using digital radiographic imaging.
Chung N; Cheng YH; Po HL; Ng WK; Cheung KC; Yung HY; Lai YM
J Orthop Translat; 2018 Oct; 15():81-90. PubMed ID: 30533384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variability in Cobb angle measurements using reformatted computerized tomography scans.
Adam CJ; Izatt MT; Harvey JR; Askin GN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1664-9. PubMed ID: 16025038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional measurement of the Cobb angle in scoliosis.
Lechner R; Putzer D; Dammerer D; Liebensteiner M; Bach C; Thaler M
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):957-962. PubMed ID: 27921155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Supine magnetic resonance imaging Cobb measurements for idiopathic scoliosis are linearly related to measurements from standing plain radiographs.
Lee MC; Solomito M; Patel A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(11):E656-61. PubMed ID: 23429689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of 3-dimensional spinal reconstruction accuracy: biplanar radiographs with EOS versus computed tomography.
Glaser DA; Doan J; Newton PO
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):1391-7. PubMed ID: 22415001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Supine to standing Cobb angle change in idiopathic scoliosis: the effect of endplate pre-selection.
Keenan BE; Izatt MT; Askin GN; Labrom RD; Pearcy MJ; Adam CJ
Scoliosis; 2014; 9():16. PubMed ID: 25342959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the Change in Axial Vertebral Rotation Following Thoracoscopic Anterior Scoliosis Surgery Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography.
Little JP; Izatt MT; Adam CJ; Lofgren O; Sundberg A; Labrom RD; Askin GN
Spine Deform; 2017 May; 5(3):172-180. PubMed ID: 28449960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The measurement of Cobb angle based on spine X-ray images using multi-scale convolutional neural network.
Liu J; Yuan C; Sun X; Sun L; Dong H; Peng Y
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2021 Sep; 44(3):809-821. PubMed ID: 34251603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
