BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32053056)

  • 1. Use of an Interactive Online Teaching Module Improved Students' Ability to Write a Clinically Appropriate SOAP Note.
    Alvarez EE; Reinhart JM
    J Vet Med Educ; 2020 Dec; 47(6):700-708. PubMed ID: 32053056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and Validation of a Rubric to Evaluate Diabetes SOAP Note Writing in APPE.
    Andrus MR; McDonough SLK; Kelley KW; Stamm PL; McCoy EK; Lisenby KM; Whitley HP; Slater N; Carroll DG; Hester EK; Helmer AM; Jackson CW; Byrd DC
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2018 Nov; 82(9):6725. PubMed ID: 30559501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of a Near Peer Tutoring Program to Improve Medical Students' Note Writing Skills.
    Olvet DM; Wackett A; Crichlow S; Baldelli P
    Teach Learn Med; 2022; 34(4):425-433. PubMed ID: 32088996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of electronic peer review of SOAP notes among pharmacy students enrolling in their first pharmacotherapeutics course.
    Chan A; Lee JY; Han Z
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2019 Dec; 11(12):1259-1264. PubMed ID: 31836151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of a Paper vs Virtual Simulated Patient Case on Student-Perceived Confidence and Engagement.
    Barnett SG; Gallimore CE; Pitterle M; Morrill J
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2016 Feb; 80(1):16. PubMed ID: 26941442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of pharmacy students' patient care skills using case scenarios with a SOAP note grading rubric and standardized patient feedback.
    Sherman JJ; Johnson CD
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2019 May; 11(5):513-521. PubMed ID: 31171254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning Outcomes From Lecture and an Online Module in the Family Medicine Clerkship.
    Everard KM; Schiel KZ
    Fam Med; 2020 Feb; 52(2):124-126. PubMed ID: 32050267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the learning potential of an interactive digital game versus an interactive-style didactic lecture: the continued importance of didactic teaching in medical student education.
    Courtier J; Webb EM; Phelps AS; Naeger DM
    Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Dec; 46(13):1787-1796. PubMed ID: 27580908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of abbreviated lecture with interactive mini-cases vs traditional lecture on student performance in the large classroom.
    Marshall LL; Nykamp DL; Momary KM
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2014 Dec; 78(10):189. PubMed ID: 25657376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SOAP Notes During APPEs: Assessment of Student Performance.
    Nguyen T; Wong E; Wang Z; Goldberg T
    J Pharm Pract; 2021 Aug; 34(4):665-668. PubMed ID: 31694447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Traditional Lecture-Based Learning versus Interactive Electronic Book Learning in Veterinary Student Comprehension of Inhalant Anesthetic Administration, Uptake, and Elimination.
    Reed RA; Cole A; Barletta M; Karpen SC; Clouser S; Moore J
    J Vet Med Educ; 2023 Feb; 50(1):121-125. PubMed ID: 35120296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Novel educational approach for medical students: improved retention rates using interactive medical software compared with traditional lecture-based format.
    Subramanian A; Timberlake M; Mittakanti H; Lara M; Brandt ML
    J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 22365876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interactive Lecture in the Dissection Hall: Transforming Passive Lecture into a Dynamic Learning Experience.
    Chimmalgi M
    Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Mar; 12(2):191-199. PubMed ID: 30118568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Debriefing to Improve Student Ability to Assess and Plan for the Care of Persons With Disability.
    Takeda MY; Smith MJ; Cone CJ
    Simul Healthc; 2017 Dec; 12(6):356-363. PubMed ID: 29210891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and pilot testing of a reflective learning guide for medical education.
    Aronson L; Niehaus B; Lindow J; Robertson PA; O'Sullivan PS
    Med Teach; 2011; 33(10):e515-21. PubMed ID: 21942487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Students' Engagement in and Perceptions of Blended Learning in a Clinical Module in a Veterinary Degree Program.
    Kelly RF; Mihm-Carmichael M; Hammond JA
    J Vet Med Educ; 2021 Apr; 48(2):181-195. PubMed ID: 31873057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the Impact of Voice-Over Screen-Captured Presentations Delivered Online on Dental Students' Learning.
    Schönwetter DJ; Gareau-Wilson N; Cunha RS; Mello I
    J Dent Educ; 2016 Feb; 80(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 26834131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing the effectiveness of asynchronous e-modules and didactic lectures to teach electrocardiogram interpretation to first year US medical students.
    Olvet DM; Sadigh K
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 May; 23(1):360. PubMed ID: 37217893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methods for Optimizing Student Pharmacist Learning of Clinical Note Writing.
    Kodweis K; Schimmelfing LC; Yang Y; Persky AM
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2021 Feb; 85(2):8170. PubMed ID: 34283740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of SOAP note performance in a pharmacotherapeutics course after implementation of a peer-review process.
    Chudow MB; Tran BAC; Thompson M; Dell KA
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2022 Jul; 14(7):870-874. PubMed ID: 35914848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.