209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32054327)
1. Improving Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Categorical Data.
Savalei V
Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(3):390-407. PubMed ID: 32054327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Influence of Number of Categories and Threshold Values on Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Ordered Categorical Data.
Xia Y; Yang Y
Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(5):731-755. PubMed ID: 30477318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods.
Xia Y; Yang Y
Behav Res Methods; 2019 Feb; 51(1):409-428. PubMed ID: 29869222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Statistical estimation of structural equation models with a mixture of continuous and categorical observed variables.
Li CH
Behav Res Methods; 2021 Oct; 53(5):2191-2213. PubMed ID: 33791955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of Estimation Methods on SEM Fit Indices.
Shi D; Maydeu-Olivares A
Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 80(3):421-445. PubMed ID: 32425213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Problem with Having Two Watches: Assessment of Fit When RMSEA and CFI Disagree.
Lai K; Green SB
Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(2-3):220-39. PubMed ID: 27014948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New computations for RMSEA and CFI following FIML and TS estimation with missing data.
Zhang X; Savalei V
Psychol Methods; 2023 Apr; 28(2):263-283. PubMed ID: 35007107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On the Computation of the RMSEA and CFI from the Mean-And-Variance Corrected Test Statistic with Nonnormal Data in SEM.
Savalei V
Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(3):419-429. PubMed ID: 29624085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are fit indices really fit to estimate the number of factors with categorical variables? Some cautionary findings via Monte Carlo simulation.
Garrido LE; Abad FJ; Ponsoda V
Psychol Methods; 2016 Mar; 21(1):93-111. PubMed ID: 26651983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Advantages of Using Unweighted Approximation Error Measures for Model Fit Assessment.
Lubbe D
Psychometrika; 2023 Jun; 88(2):413-433. PubMed ID: 37071271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adapting fit indices for Bayesian structural equation modeling: Comparison to maximum likelihood.
Garnier-Villarreal M; Jorgensen TD
Psychol Methods; 2020 Feb; 25(1):46-70. PubMed ID: 31180693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A unified model-implied instrumental variable approach for structural equation modeling with mixed variables.
Jin S; Yang-Wallentin F; Bollen KA
Psychometrika; 2021 Jun; 86(2):564-594. PubMed ID: 34097200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the performance of existing and novel equivalence tests for fit indices in structural equation modelling.
Beribisky N; Cribbie RA
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2024 Feb; 77(1):103-129. PubMed ID: 37448144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating Structural Equation Models for Categorical Outcomes: A New Test Statistic and a Practical Challenge of Interpretation.
Monroe S; Cai L
Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(6):569-83. PubMed ID: 26717119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Alternative Multiple Imputation Inference for Categorical Structural Equation Modeling.
Chung S; Cai L
Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(3):323-337. PubMed ID: 30950634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The performance of robust test statistics with categorical data.
Savalei V; Rhemtulla M
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):201-23. PubMed ID: 22568535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. GW-SEM: A Statistical Package to Conduct Genome-Wide Structural Equation Modeling.
Verhulst B; Maes HH; Neale MC
Behav Genet; 2017 May; 47(3):345-359. PubMed ID: 28299468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. dynamic : An R Package for Deriving Dynamic Fit Index Cutoffs for Factor Analysis.
Wolf MG; McNeish D
Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):189-194. PubMed ID: 36787513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Meta-analytic structural equation modeling with moderating effects on SEM parameters.
Jak S; Cheung MW
Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):430-455. PubMed ID: 31670537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Limited Information Estimator for Dynamic Factor Models.
Fisher ZF; Bollen KA; Gates KM
Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(2):246-263. PubMed ID: 30829065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
