285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32054496)
1. Evaluation of plan quality and robustness of IMPT and helical IMRT for cervical cancer.
Shang H; Pu Y; Wang W; Dai Z; Jin F
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Feb; 15(1):34. PubMed ID: 32054496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric benefits of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in the treatment of postoperative cervical cancer patients.
Deng X; Han C; Chen S; Xie C; Yi J; Zhou Y; Zheng X; Deng Z; Jin X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 28291936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases.
Tran A; Zhang J; Woods K; Yu V; Nguyen D; Gustafson G; Rosen L; Sheng K
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jan; 12(1):10. PubMed ID: 28077128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robust optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy with soft spot sensitivity regularization.
Gu W; Ruan D; O'Connor D; Zou W; Dong L; Tsai MY; Jia X; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1408-1425. PubMed ID: 30570164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative planning study of step-and-shoot IMRT versus helical tomotherapy for whole-pelvis irradiation in cervical cancer.
Chitapanarux I; Tharavichitkul E; Nobnop W; Wanwilairat S; Vongtama R; Traisathit P
J Radiat Res; 2015 May; 56(3):539-45. PubMed ID: 25720771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric comparison of distal esophageal carcinoma plans for patients treated with small-spot intensity-modulated proton versus volumetric-modulated arc therapies.
Liu C; Bhangoo RS; Sio TT; Yu NY; Shan J; Chiang JS; Ding JX; Rule WG; Korte S; Lara P; Ding X; Bues M; Hu Y; DeWees T; Ashman JB; Liu W
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 20(7):15-27. PubMed ID: 31112371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Technical Note: Treatment planning system (TPS) approximations matter - comparing intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plan quality and robustness between a commercial and an in-house developed TPS for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Liu C; Yu NY; Shan J; Bhangoo RS; Daniels TB; Chiang JS; Ding X; Lara P; Patrick CL; Archuleta JP; DeWees T; Hu Y; Schild SE; Bues M; Sio TT; Liu W
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4755-4762. PubMed ID: 31498885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A treatment planning study comparing IMRT techniques and cyber knife for stereotactic body radiotherapy of low-risk prostate carcinoma.
Scobioala S; Kittel C; Elsayad K; Kroeger K; Oertel M; Samhouri L; Haverkamp U; Eich HT
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Aug; 14(1):143. PubMed ID: 31399115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Helical tomotherapy vs. intensity-modulated proton therapy for whole pelvis irradiation in high-risk prostate cancer patients: dosimetric, normal tissue complication probability, and generalized equivalent uniform dose analysis.
Widesott L; Pierelli A; Fiorino C; Lomax AJ; Amichetti M; Cozzarini C; Soukup M; Schneider R; Hug E; Di Muzio N; Calandrino R; Schwarz M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Aug; 80(5):1589-600. PubMed ID: 21167651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Target tailoring and proton beam therapy to reduce small bowel dose in cervical cancer radiotherapy : A comparison of benefits.
de Boer P; van de Schoot AJAJ; Westerveld H; Smit M; Buist MR; Bel A; Rasch CRN; Stalpers LJA
Strahlenther Onkol; 2018 Mar; 194(3):255-263. PubMed ID: 29101415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Zhu RX; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709. PubMed ID: 23387732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeling the target dose fall-off in IMRT and VMAT planning techniques for cervical SBRT.
Brito Delgado A; Cohen D; Eng TY; Stanley DN; Shi Z; Charlton M; Gutiérrez AN
Med Dosim; 2018 Spring; 43(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 29223302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Which technique for radiation is most beneficial for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer? Intensity modulated proton therapy versus intensity modulated photon treatment, helical tomotherapy and volumetric arc therapy for primary radiation - an intraindividual comparison.
Marnitz S; Wlodarczyk W; Neumann O; Koehler C; Weihrauch M; Budach V; Cozzi L
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 10():91. PubMed ID: 25896675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In silico comparison of whole pelvis intensity-modulated photon versus proton therapy for the postoperative management of prostate cancer.
Gogineni E; Cruickshank IK; Chen H; Halthore A; Li H; Deville C
Acta Oncol; 2023 Jun; 62(6):642-647. PubMed ID: 37345868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiobiological model-based approach to determine the potential of dose-escalated robust intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy in reducing gastrointestinal toxicity in the treatment of locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer of the head.
Raturi VP; Hojo H; Hotta K; Baba H; Takahashi R; Rachi T; Nakamura N; Zenda S; Motegi A; Tachibana H; Ariji T; Motegi K; Nakamura M; Okumura M; Hirano Y; Akimoto T
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Jun; 15(1):157. PubMed ID: 32571379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implementation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and comparison with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in the postoperative treatment of cervical cancer.
Marjanovic D; Plesinac Karapandzic V; Stojanovic Rundic S; Tomasevic A; Saric M; Miskovic I; Nidzovic B; Mikovic M; Petrasinovic P
J BUON; 2019; 24(5):2028-2034. PubMed ID: 31786871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A dosimetric comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and High Dose Rate (HDR) brachytherapy in localized cervical cancer radiotherapy.
Wali L; Helal A; Darwesh R; Attar M
J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(3):473-483. PubMed ID: 30958322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric comparison of different multileaf collimator leaves in treatment planning of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer.
Wang S; Ai P; Xie L; Xu Q; Bai S; Lu Y; Li P; Chen N
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 24099965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improve the dosimetric outcome in bilateral head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy: a feasibility study.
Liu G; Li X; Qin A; Zheng W; Yan D; Zhang S; Stevens C; Kabolizadeh P; Ding X
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Jan; 15(1):21. PubMed ID: 32000817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An integrated strategy of biological and physical constraints in biological optimization for cervical carcinoma.
Feng Z; Tao C; Zhu J; Chen J; Yu G; Qin S; Yin Y; Li D
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Apr; 12(1):64. PubMed ID: 28376900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
