These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3205666)

  • 1. The apparent size of three-dimensional objects and their silhouettes: a solid-superiority effect.
    Walker JT; Walker MJ
    Perception; 1988; 17(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 3205666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Geometrical illusions in solid objects under ordinary viewing conditions.
    DeLucia PR; Hochberg J
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Dec; 50(6):547-54. PubMed ID: 1780202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Illusion reversal rate as a function of subjective depth.
    Borresen CR
    J Gen Psychol; 1990 Jan; 117(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 2313278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of apparent depth and context in the perception of the Ponzo illusion.
    Schiffman HR; Thompson JG
    Perception; 1978; 7(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 628580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The apparent distance of interior and exterior corners: a test of Gregory's misapplied size constancy explanation for the Mueller-Lyer illusion.
    McGraw KO; Stanford J
    J Gen Psychol; 1994 Jan; 121(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 8021629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of changes in fin-length on apparent shaft-length and depth in the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Jaeger T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Aug; 41(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 1178436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outlined objects in a Mach pattern create illusions: further evidence of a frequency code for size.
    Jaeger T; Long S; Lang J
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Aug; 107(1):165-80. PubMed ID: 18986044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Superadditivity of the Ebbinghaus and Müller-Lyer illusions depends on the method of comparison used.
    Foster RM; Franz VH
    Perception; 2014; 43(8):783-95. PubMed ID: 25549508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Signal-detection analysis of the Müller-Lyer and the Horizontal-Vertical illusions.
    Brosvic GM; Civale NA; Long P; Kieley D; Kristoff K; Memblatt N; Gordon R; Parris L; Giambelluca C; Dihoff RE
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Dec; 79(3 Pt 1):1299-304. PubMed ID: 7899013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The vista paradox: a natural visual illusion.
    Walker JT; Rupich RC; Powell JL
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jan; 45(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 2913569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The reversed Müller-Lyer illusion and figure-ground organization theory.
    Taya R; Ohashi Y
    Perception; 1992; 21(5):611-26. PubMed ID: 1488264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "Reversed' illusion with three-dimensional Müller-Lyer shapes.
    Nijhawan R
    Perception; 1995; 24(11):1281-96. PubMed ID: 8643333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Length illusion in fractional Müller-Lyer stimuli: an object-perception approach.
    Redding GM; Hawley E
    Perception; 1993; 22(7):819-28. PubMed ID: 8115239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Framing effects and the reversed Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Predebon J
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Sep; 52(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 1408641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Foreshortened tiles in paths converging on an observer viewing a picture: elevation and visual angle ratio determine perceived size.
    Juricevic I; Kennedy JM; Abramov I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 19304613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Size and direction of distortion in geometric-optical illusions: conciliation between the Müller-Lyer and Titchener configurations.
    Nemati F
    Perception; 2009; 38(11):1585-600. PubMed ID: 20120258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assimilation theory, attention, and asymmetry in Müller-Lyer illusions: quantitative predictions.
    Pressey AW
    Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Oct; 119(2):509-29. PubMed ID: 25349892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. More thoughts on perceiving and grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Otto-de Haart EG; Carey DP; Milne AB
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Dec; 37(13):1437-44. PubMed ID: 10617263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Müller-Lyer illusion and perception of numerosity.
    Agostini T; Luccio R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Jun; 78(3 Pt 1):937-8. PubMed ID: 8084714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assimilation theory, attentive fields, and the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Bross M; Blair R; Longtin P
    Perception; 1978; 7(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 693229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.