These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3205668)
1. The concave cusp as a determiner of figure-ground. Stevens KA; Brookes A Perception; 1988; 17(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 3205668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Figure-ground organization in real and subjective contours: a new ambiguous figure, some novel measures of ambiguity, and apparent distance across regions of figure and ground. Shank MD; Walker JT Percept Psychophys; 1989 Aug; 46(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 2762100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extremal edges: a powerful cue to depth perception and figure-ground organization. Palmer SE; Ghose T Psychol Sci; 2008 Jan; 19(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 18181795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A search asymmetry reversed by figure-ground assignment. Humphreys GW; Müller H Psychol Sci; 2000 May; 11(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 11273403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Illusory-figure lightness: evidence for a two-component theory. Parks TE Perception; 1989; 18(6):783-8. PubMed ID: 2628928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conflicting figure--ground and depth information reduces moving phantom visibility. Brown JM; Weisstein N Perception; 1991; 20(2):155-65. PubMed ID: 1745588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extremal edges versus other principles of figure-ground organization. Ghose T; Palmer SE J Vis; 2010 Jul; 10(8):3. PubMed ID: 20884578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Figure-ground organization in different phases of the perceptual alternation phenomenon. Tuccio MT Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Dec; 81(3 Pt 1):1043-58. PubMed ID: 8668426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Convexities move because they contain matter. Barenholtz E J Vis; 2010 Sep; 10(11):19. PubMed ID: 20884514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Parts of visual objects: an experimental test of the minima rule. Braunstein ML; Hoffman DD; Saidpour A Perception; 1989; 18(6):817-26. PubMed ID: 2628932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Change in perceived size with figure-ground reversal. Brigner WL Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Aug; 63(1):254. PubMed ID: 3748737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Globally inconsistent figure/ground relations induced by a negative part. Kim SH; Feldman J J Vis; 2009 Sep; 9(10):8.1-13. PubMed ID: 19810789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inhibitory competition in figure-ground perception: context and convexity. Peterson MA; Salvagio E J Vis; 2008 Dec; 8(16):4.1-13. PubMed ID: 19146271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Similar processing of real- and subjective-contour Poggendorff figures by men and women. Beckett PA Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Feb; 70(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 2326138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensitivity to reflection and translation is modulated by objectness. Bertamini M Perception; 2010; 39(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 20301844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatial and orientation specific integration in the tilt illusion. Johnstone S; Wenderoth P Perception; 1989; 18(1):5-23. PubMed ID: 2771594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]