These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32058633)

  • 1. Time-varying nodal measures with temporal community structure: A cautionary note to avoid misinterpretation.
    Thompson WH; Kastrati G; Finc K; Wright J; Shine JM; Poldrack RA
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Jun; 41(9):2347-2356. PubMed ID: 32058633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dyconnmap: Dynamic connectome mapping-A neuroimaging python module.
    Marimpis AD; Dimitriadis SI; Goebel R
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Oct; 42(15):4909-4939. PubMed ID: 34250674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian switching factor analysis for estimating time-varying functional connectivity in fMRI.
    Taghia J; Ryali S; Chen T; Supekar K; Cai W; Menon V
    Neuroimage; 2017 Jul; 155():271-290. PubMed ID: 28267626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Within node connectivity changes, not simply edge changes, influence graph theory measures in functional connectivity studies of the brain.
    Luo W; Greene AS; Constable RT
    Neuroimage; 2021 Oct; 240():118332. PubMed ID: 34224851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Complementary contributions of concurrent EEG and fMRI connectivity for predicting structural connectivity.
    Wirsich J; Ridley B; Besson P; Jirsa V; Bénar C; Ranjeva JP; Guye M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Nov; 161():251-260. PubMed ID: 28842386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sparse DCM for whole-brain effective connectivity from resting-state fMRI data.
    Prando G; Zorzi M; Bertoldo A; Corbetta M; Zorzi M; Chiuso A
    Neuroimage; 2020 Mar; 208():116367. PubMed ID: 31812714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Constructing Connectome Atlas by Graph Laplacian Learning.
    Kim M; Yan C; Yang D; Liang P; Kaufer DI; Wu G
    Neuroinformatics; 2021 Apr; 19(2):233-249. PubMed ID: 32712763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tracking spatial dynamics of functional connectivity during a task.
    Wu L; Caprihan A; Calhoun V
    Neuroimage; 2021 Oct; 239():118310. PubMed ID: 34175424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multi-scale network regression for brain-phenotype associations.
    Xia CH; Ma Z; Cui Z; Bzdok D; Thirion B; Bassett DS; Satterthwaite TD; Shinohara RT; Witten DM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Jul; 41(10):2553-2566. PubMed ID: 32216125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring MEG brain fingerprints: Evaluation, pitfalls, and interpretations.
    Sareen E; Zahar S; Ville DV; Gupta A; Griffa A; Amico E
    Neuroimage; 2021 Oct; 240():118331. PubMed ID: 34237444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Structural determinants of dynamic fluctuations between segregation and integration on the human connectome.
    Fukushima M; Sporns O
    Commun Biol; 2020 Oct; 3(1):606. PubMed ID: 33097809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal complexity of fMRI is reproducible and correlates with higher order cognition.
    Omidvarnia A; Zalesky A; Mansour L S; Van De Ville D; Jackson GD; Pedersen M
    Neuroimage; 2021 Apr; 230():117760. PubMed ID: 33486124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The compensatory phenomenon of the functional connectome related to pathological biomarkers in individuals with subjective cognitive decline.
    Chen H; Sheng X; Luo C; Qin R; Ye Q; Zhao H; Xu Y; Bai F;
    Transl Neurodegener; 2020 May; 9(1):21. PubMed ID: 32460888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Brain network segregation and integration during an epoch-related working memory fMRI experiment.
    Fransson P; Schiffler BC; Thompson WH
    Neuroimage; 2018 Sep; 178():147-161. PubMed ID: 29777824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A method to assess randomness of functional connectivity matrices.
    Vergara VM; Yu Q; Calhoun VD
    J Neurosci Methods; 2018 Jun; 303():146-158. PubMed ID: 29601886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A framework for identification of a resting-bold connectome associated with cognitive reserve.
    Stern Y; Varangis E; Habeck C
    Neuroimage; 2021 May; 232():117875. PubMed ID: 33639257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of Directed Effective Connectivity from fMRI Functional Connectivity Hints at Asymmetries of Cortical Connectome.
    Gilson M; Moreno-Bote R; Ponce-Alvarez A; Ritter P; Deco G
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Mar; 12(3):e1004762. PubMed ID: 26982185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Behavioural relevance of spontaneous, transient brain network interactions in fMRI.
    Vidaurre D; Llera A; Smith SM; Woolrich MW
    Neuroimage; 2021 Apr; 229():117713. PubMed ID: 33421594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in directed functional brain connectivity related to age, sex and mental health.
    Lund MJ; Alnaes D; Schwab S; van der Meer D; Andreassen OA; Westlye LT; Kaufmann T
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Oct; 41(15):4173-4186. PubMed ID: 32613721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Concurrent EEG- and fMRI-derived functional connectomes exhibit linked dynamics.
    Wirsich J; Giraud AL; Sadaghiani S
    Neuroimage; 2020 Oct; 219():116998. PubMed ID: 32480035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.