These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32058741)

  • 1. Modeling Echo Chambers and Polarization Dynamics in Social Networks.
    Baumann F; Lorenz-Spreen P; Sokolov IM; Starnini M
    Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Jan; 124(4):048301. PubMed ID: 32058741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Echo chambers and viral misinformation: Modeling fake news as complex contagion.
    Törnberg P
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203958. PubMed ID: 30235239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Polarization of the vaccination debate on Facebook.
    Schmidt AL; Zollo F; Scala A; Betsch C; Quattrociocchi W
    Vaccine; 2018 Jun; 36(25):3606-3612. PubMed ID: 29773322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Depolarization of echo chambers by random dynamical nudge.
    Currin CB; Vera SV; Khaledi-Nasab A
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):9234. PubMed ID: 35654942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Users Polarization on Facebook and Youtube.
    Bessi A; Zollo F; Del Vicario M; Puliga M; Scala A; Caldarelli G; Uzzi B; Quattrociocchi W
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0159641. PubMed ID: 27551783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The echo chamber effect on social media.
    Cinelli M; De Francisci Morales G; Galeazzi A; Quattrociocchi W; Starnini M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Mar; 118(9):. PubMed ID: 33622786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ideology, communication and polarization.
    Kashima Y; Perfors A; Ferdinand V; Pattenden E
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2021 Apr; 376(1822):20200133. PubMed ID: 33612005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Depolarization of opinions on social networks through random nudges.
    Pal R; Kumar A; Santhanam MS
    Phys Rev E; 2023 Sep; 108(3-1):034307. PubMed ID: 37849173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Users' participation and social influence during information spreading on Twitter.
    Zhang X; Han DD; Yang R; Zhang Z
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0183290. PubMed ID: 28902906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebook.
    Del Vicario M; Vivaldo G; Bessi A; Zollo F; Scala A; Caldarelli G; Quattrociocchi W
    Sci Rep; 2016 Dec; 6():37825. PubMed ID: 27905402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Social Media Polarization and Echo Chambers in the Context of COVID-19: Case Study.
    Jiang J; Ren X; Ferrara E
    JMIRx Med; 2021; 2(3):e29570. PubMed ID: 34459833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling the emergence of affective polarization in the social media society.
    Törnberg P; Andersson C; Lindgren K; Banisch S
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258259. PubMed ID: 34634056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital cloning of online social networks for language-sensitive agent-based modeling of misinformation spread.
    Puri P; Hassler G; Katragadda S; Shenk A
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0304889. PubMed ID: 38905208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transitions between polarization and radicalization in a temporal bilayer echo-chamber model.
    Gajewski ŁG; Sienkiewicz J; Hołyst JA
    Phys Rev E; 2022 Feb; 105(2-1):024125. PubMed ID: 35291103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The geographic embedding of online echo chambers: Evidence from the Brexit campaign.
    Bastos M; Mercea D; Baronchelli A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206841. PubMed ID: 30388169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detecting and modelling real percolation and phase transitions of information on social media.
    Xie J; Meng F; Sun J; Ma X; Yan G; Hu Y
    Nat Hum Behav; 2021 Sep; 5(9):1161-1168. PubMed ID: 33795858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Opinion formation on dynamic networks: identifying conditions for the emergence of partisan echo chambers.
    Evans T; Fu F
    R Soc Open Sci; 2018 Oct; 5(10):181122. PubMed ID: 30473855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Entropy-based detection of Twitter echo chambers.
    Pratelli M; Saracco F; Petrocchi M
    PNAS Nexus; 2024 May; 3(5):pgae177. PubMed ID: 38737768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network.
    González-Bailón S; Borge-Holthoefer J; Rivero A; Moreno Y
    Sci Rep; 2011; 1():197. PubMed ID: 22355712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How minimizing conflicts could lead to polarization on social media: An agent-based model investigation.
    Coscia M; Rossi L
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0263184. PubMed ID: 35085365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.