These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3205917)

  • 1. [MR vs CT: which is the diagnostic advantage in neuroradiology].
    Cirillo S; Simonetti L; La Tessa G; Elefante R; Smaltino F
    Radiol Med; 1988 Nov; 76(5):390-8. PubMed ID: 3205917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of CT and MR in 400 patients with suspected disease of the brain and cervical spinal cord.
    Bradley WG; Waluch V; Yadley RA; Wycoff RR
    Radiology; 1984 Sep; 152(3):695-702. PubMed ID: 6463251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of MR and CT myelography in imaging the cervical and thoracic spine.
    Karnaze MG; Gado MH; Sartor KJ; Hodges FJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Feb; 150(2):397-403. PubMed ID: 3257332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic resonance imaging of lesions of the posterior fossa and upper cervical cord in childhood.
    Packer RJ; Zimmerman RA; Bilanuik LT; Leurssen TG; Sutton LN; Bruce DA; Schut L
    Pediatrics; 1985 Jul; 76(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 4011359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pearls and pitfalls in clinical neuroradiology.
    Greenspan SL; Mathews VP
    Semin Neurol; 1998; 18(2):221-36. PubMed ID: 9608619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of diseases of the brain and spinal cord].
    Scotti G; Scialfa G; Landoni L
    Radiol Med; 1985; 71(1-2):3-16. PubMed ID: 4023303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spine. Is clinical efficacy established after the first decade?
    Kent DL; Larson EB
    Ann Intern Med; 1988 Mar; 108(3):402-24. PubMed ID: 3277514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents: theory and application to the central nervous system.
    Bronen RA; Sze G
    J Neurosurg; 1990 Dec; 73(6):820-39. PubMed ID: 2230966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Imaging of cystic and cavitary lesions of the spinal cord and canal. The value of MR and intraoperative sonography.
    Kochan JP; Quencer RM
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1991 Jul; 29(4):867-911. PubMed ID: 2063008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Posttraumatic spinal cord lesions without skeletal or discal and ligamentous abnormalities: the role of MR imaging.
    Paleologos TS; Fratzoglou MM; Papadopoulos SS; Chatzidakis EE; Gouliamos AD; Kourousis DD
    J Spinal Disord; 1998 Aug; 11(4):346-9. PubMed ID: 9726306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of MR contrast agents in the evaluation of disease of the spine.
    Jinkins JR; Runge VM
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 7(3):168-80. PubMed ID: 7654395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging at The Royal North Shore Hospital of Sydney, 1986-1987.
    Sorby WA
    Med J Aust; 1989 Jul; 151(1):8-11, 14-8. PubMed ID: 2671616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [1000 MR examinations--a report and reflections].
    Schubiger O; Niezabitowski K
    Pol Przegl Radiol; 1988; 52(3):174-7. PubMed ID: 3076635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Magnetic resonance (MR): its impact in the imaging diagnosis of spinal cord pathology].
    Bernardi B; Brayda G; Monesi M; Trevisan C
    Arch Putti Chir Organi Mov; 1985; 35():433-9. PubMed ID: 3843055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Neuroradiology of the spinal cord].
    Valavanis A
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1992 Oct; 122(44):1649-60. PubMed ID: 1439684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Use of high performance nuclear magnetic resonance tomography in neuroradiology. Experience with 2,000 studies].
    Wichmann W; Valavanis A; Haller D
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1987 Nov; 117(47):1841-52. PubMed ID: 3423772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Indications for magnetic resonance tomography].
    Schörner W; Felix R
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1989 Aug; 114(33):1248-52. PubMed ID: 2670500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spinal cord artifacts from truncation errors during MR imaging.
    Levy LM; Di Chiro G; Brooks RA; Dwyer AJ; Wener L; Frank J
    Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):479-83. PubMed ID: 3336724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of CT, low-field-strength MR imaging, and high-field-strength MR imaging. Work in progress.
    Orrison WW; Stimac GK; Stevens EA; LaMasters DL; Espinosa MC; Cobb L; Mettler FA
    Radiology; 1991 Oct; 181(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 1887020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pediatric spinal cord and canal.
    Zimmerman RA; Bilaniuk LT; Hackney DB; Goldberg HI; Grossman RI
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1986; 369():649-50. PubMed ID: 2980584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.