266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32059702)
1. A post-market, multi-vessel evaluation of the imaging of peripheral arteries for diagnostic purposeS comparing optical Coherence tomogrApy and iNtravascular ultrasound imaging (SCAN).
Pavillard E; Sewall L
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Feb; 20(1):18. PubMed ID: 32059702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective evaluation of optical coherence tomography in lower limb arteries compared with intravascular ultrasound.
Eberhardt KM; Treitl M; Boesenecker K; Maxien D; Reiser M; Rieger J
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1499-508. PubMed ID: 23962439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial.
Ali ZA; Maehara A; Généreux P; Shlofmitz RA; Fabbiocchi F; Nazif TM; Guagliumi G; Meraj PM; Alfonso F; Samady H; Akasaka T; Carlson EB; Leesar MA; Matsumura M; Ozan MO; Mintz GS; Ben-Yehuda O; Stone GW;
Lancet; 2016 Nov; 388(10060):2618-2628. PubMed ID: 27806900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in detecting neointimal healing patterns after stent implantation.
Kochman J; Pietrasik A; Rdzanak A; Jąkała J; Zasada W; Scibisz A; Kołtowski L; Proniewska K; Pociask E; Legutko J
Kardiol Pol; 2014; 72(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 24293141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. First in-human evaluation of a novel intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography system for intracoronary imaging.
Akl E; Pinilla-Echeverri N; Garcia-Garcia HM; Mehta SR; Dan K; Kuku KO; Courtney BK; Sheth T
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Feb; 99(3):686-698. PubMed ID: 34792273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interobserver Variability Between Expert, Experienced, and Novice Operator Affects Interpretation of Optical Coherence Tomography and 20 MHz Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging.
Martin WG; McNaughton E; Bambrough PB; West NEJ; Hoole SP
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2023 Feb; 47():33-39. PubMed ID: 36207273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo coronary lesion differentiation with computed tomography angiography and intravascular ultrasound as compared to optical coherence tomography.
Wieringa WG; Lexis CP; Lipsic E; van der Werf HW; Burgerhof JG; Hagens VE; Bartels GL; Broersen A; Schurer RA; Tan ES; van der Harst P; van den Heuvel AF; Willems TP; Pundziute G
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(2):111-118. PubMed ID: 28169175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. First Report of Edge Vascular Response at 12 Months of Magmaris, A Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Resorbable Magnesium Scaffold, Assessed by Grayscale Intravascular Ultrasound, Virtual Histology, and Optical Coherence Tomography. A Biosolve-II Trial Sub-Study.
Hideo-Kajita A; Garcia-Garcia HM; Haude M; Joner M; Koolen J; Ince H; Abizaid A; Toelg R; Lemos PA; von Birgelen C; Christiansen EH; Wijns W; Neumann FJ; Kaiser C; Eeckhout E; Teik LS; Escaned J; Azizi V; Kuku KO; Ozaki Y; Dan K; Waksman R
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 May; 20(5):392-398. PubMed ID: 31079817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in identifying functionally significant coronary stenosis according to vessel diameter: A meta-analysis of 2,581 patients and 2,807 lesions.
D'Ascenzo F; Barbero U; Cerrato E; Lipinski MJ; Omedè P; Montefusco A; Taha S; Naganuma T; Reith S; Voros S; Latib A; Gonzalo N; Quadri G; Colombo A; Biondi-Zoccai G; Escaned J; Moretti C; Gaita F
Am Heart J; 2015 May; 169(5):663-73. PubMed ID: 25965714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Comparison of Intravascular Imaging Modalities for Detection of Stent Struts in Acute Coronary Syndrome.
Hyeon SH; Lee WS; Kim DI; Shin ES; Kim KS; Hong YJ; Lee SY; Won H; Kim TH; Kim SW
J Interv Cardiol; 2016 Feb; 29(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 26864953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In Vivo Calcium Detection by Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Angiography.
Wang X; Matsumura M; Mintz GS; Lee T; Zhang W; Cao Y; Fujino A; Lin Y; Usui E; Kanaji Y; Murai T; Yonetsu T; Kakuta T; Maehara A
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Aug; 10(8):869-879. PubMed ID: 28797408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of observer variability and reliability in the assessment of stent deployment: the OCTIVUS study.
Magnus PC; Jayne JE; Garcia-Garcia HM; Swart M; van Es GA; Tijssen J; Kaplan AV
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 25620044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of frequency-domain optical coherence tomography guidance for optimal coronary stent implantation in comparison with intravascular ultrasound guidance.
Habara M; Nasu K; Terashima M; Kaneda H; Yokota D; Ko E; Ito T; Kurita T; Tanaka N; Kimura M; Ito T; Kinoshita Y; Tsuchikane E; Asakura K; Asakura Y; Katoh O; Suzuki T
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Apr; 5(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 22456026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Coronary calcification as a mechanism of plaque/media shrinkage in vessels treated with bioresorbable vascular scaffold: A multimodality intracoronary imaging study.
Zeng Y; Cavalcante R; Collet C; Tenekecioglu E; Sotomi Y; Miyazaki Y; Katagiri Y; Asano T; Abdelghani M; Nie S; Bourantas CV; Bruining N; Onuma Y; Serruys PW
Atherosclerosis; 2018 Feb; 269():6-13. PubMed ID: 29247976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
Maehara A; Ben-Yehuda O; Ali Z; Wijns W; Bezerra HG; Shite J; Généreux P; Nichols M; Jenkins P; Witzenbichler B; Mintz GS; Stone GW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative precision of optical frequency domain imaging: direct comparison with frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound.
Kobayashi Y; Kitahara H; Tanaka S; Okada K; Kimura T; Ikeno F; Yock PG; Fitzgerald PJ; Honda Y
Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2016 Apr; 31(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 26271203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. FD-OCT and IVUS intravascular imaging modalities in peripheral vasculature.
Spiliopoulos S; Kitrou P; Katsanos K; Karnabatidis D
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2017 Feb; 14(2):127-134. PubMed ID: 28064551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical study of optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary artery thrombus.
Hong C; Luo FQ; Liu CL; Zhong NS; Li JY; Wang W
Thromb Res; 2018 Jan; 161():52-59. PubMed ID: 29182940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of peripheral atherosclerosis: a comparative analysis of angiography and intravascular ultrasound imaging.
Arthurs ZM; Bishop PD; Feiten LE; Eagleton MJ; Clair DG; Kashyap VS
J Vasc Surg; 2010 Apr; 51(4):933-8; discussion 939. PubMed ID: 20080002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Imaging assessment and accuracy in coronary artery autopsy: comparison of frequency-domain optical coherence tomography with intravascular ultrasound and histology.
Shimokado A; Kubo T; Matsuo Y; Ino Y; Shiono Y; Shimamura K; Katayama Y; Taruya A; Nishiguchi T; Kashiwagi M; Kitabata H; Tanaka A; Hozumi T; Akasaka T
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Oct; 35(10):1785-1790. PubMed ID: 31175528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
