These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32060007)

  • 1. GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy.
    Schünemann HJ; Mustafa RA; Brozek J; Steingart KR; Leeflang M; Murad MH; Bossuyt P; Glasziou P; Jaeschke R; Lange S; Meerpohl J; Langendam M; Hultcrantz M; Vist GE; Akl EA; Helfand M; Santesso N; Hooft L; Scholten R; Rosen M; Rutjes A; Crowther M; Muti P; Raatz H; Ansari MT; Williams J; Kunz R; Harris J; Rodriguez IA; Kohli M; Guyatt GH;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 122():129-141. PubMed ID: 32060007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.
    Schünemann HJ; Mustafa RA; Brozek J; Steingart KR; Leeflang M; Murad MH; Bossuyt P; Glasziou P; Jaeschke R; Lange S; Meerpohl J; Langendam M; Hultcrantz M; Vist GE; Akl EA; Helfand M; Santesso N; Hooft L; Scholten R; Rosen M; Rutjes A; Crowther M; Muti P; Raatz H; Ansari MT; Williams J; Kunz R; Harris J; Rodriguez IA; Kohli M; Guyatt GH;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 122():142-152. PubMed ID: 32058069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. GRADE Guidance: 31. Assessing the certainty across a body of evidence for comparative test accuracy.
    Yang B; Mustafa RA; Bossuyt PM; Brozek J; Hultcrantz M; Leeflang MMG; Schünemann HJ; Langendam MW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 136():146-156. PubMed ID: 33864930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. GRADE Guidelines 28: Use of GRADE for the assessment of evidence about prognostic factors: rating certainty in identification of groups of patients with different absolute risks.
    Foroutan F; Guyatt G; Zuk V; Vandvik PO; Alba AC; Mustafa R; Vernooij R; Arevalo-Rodriguez I; Munn Z; Roshanov P; Riley R; Schandelmaier S; Kuijpers T; Siemieniuk R; Canelo-Aybar C; Schunemann H; Iorio A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 May; 121():62-70. PubMed ID: 31982539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences: Risk of bias and indirectness].
    Kaiser L; Hübscher M; Rissling O; Schulz S; Langer G; Meerpohl J; Schwingshackl L
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2021 Feb; 160():78-88. PubMed ID: 33461905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-Risk of bias and indirectness.
    Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Guyatt GH; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Akl EA; Hazlewood G; Pardo-Hernandez H; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I; Qaseem A; Williams JW; Tugwell P; Flottorp S; Chang Y; Zhang Y; Mustafa RA; Rojas MX; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():94-104. PubMed ID: 29452223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. GRADE guidelines 33: Addressing imprecision in a network meta-analysis.
    Brignardello-Petersen R; Guyatt GH; Mustafa RA; Chu DK; Hultcrantz M; Schünemann HJ; Tomlinson G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 139():49-56. PubMed ID: 34293434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. GRADE Guidelines 30: the GRADE approach to assessing the certainty of modeled evidence-An overview in the context of health decision-making.
    Brozek JL; Canelo-Aybar C; Akl EA; Bowen JM; Bucher J; Chiu WA; Cronin M; Djulbegovic B; Falavigna M; Guyatt GH; Gordon AA; Hilton Boon M; Hutubessy RCW; Joore MA; Katikireddi V; LaKind J; Langendam M; Manja V; Magnuson K; Mathioudakis AG; Meerpohl J; Mertz D; Mezencev R; Morgan R; Morgano GP; Mustafa R; O'Flaherty M; Patlewicz G; Riva JJ; Posso M; Rooney A; Schlosser PM; Schwartz L; Shemilt I; Tarride JE; Thayer KA; Tsaioun K; Vale L; Wambaugh J; Wignall J; Williams A; Xie F; Zhang Y; Schünemann HJ;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Jan; 129():138-150. PubMed ID: 32980429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: addressing incoherence.
    Brignardello-Petersen R; Mustafa RA; Siemieniuk RAC; Murad MH; Agoritsas T; Izcovich A; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 108():77-85. PubMed ID: 30529648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [How to interpret the certainty of evidence based on GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation)].
    Schwingshackl L; Rüschemeyer G; Meerpohl JJ
    Urologe A; 2021 Apr; 60(4):444-454. PubMed ID: 33620513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The GRADE approach, Part 1: how to assess the certainty of the evidence.
    Kirmayr M; Quilodrán C; Valente B; Loezar C; Garegnani L; Franco JVA
    Medwave; 2021 Mar; 21(2):e8109. PubMed ID: 33830974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Guidelines that use the GRADE approach often fail to provide complete economic information for recommendations: A systematic survey.
    Riva JJ; Bhatt M; Brunarski DJ; Busse JW; Martins CC; Xie F; Schünemann HJ; Brozek JL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 136():203-215. PubMed ID: 33984495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence].
    Morche J; Freitag S; Hoffmann F; Rissling O; Langer G; Nußbaumer-Streit B; Toews I; Gartlehner G; Meerpohl JJ
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2020 Apr; 150-152():124-133. PubMed ID: 31980320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. GRADE Guidelines: 29. Rating the certainty in time-to-event outcomes-Study limitations due to censoring of participants with missing data in intervention studies.
    Goldkuhle M; Bender R; Akl EA; van Dalen EC; Nevitt S; Mustafa RA; Guyatt GH; Trivella M; Djulbegovic B; Schünemann H; Cinquini M; Kreuzberger N; Skoetz N;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Jan; 129():126-137. PubMed ID: 33007458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. GRADE guidelines: 22. The GRADE approach for tests and strategies-from test accuracy to patient-important outcomes and recommendations.
    Schünemann HJ; Mustafa RA; Brozek J; Santesso N; Bossuyt PM; Steingart KR; Leeflang M; Lange S; Trenti T; Langendam M; Scholten R; Hooft L; Murad MH; Jaeschke R; Rutjes A; Singh J; Helfand M; Glasziou P; Arevalo-Rodriguez I; Akl EA; Deeks JJ; Guyatt GH;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():69-82. PubMed ID: 30738926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applying Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to diagnostic tests was challenging but doable.
    Gopalakrishna G; Mustafa RA; Davenport C; Scholten RJ; Hyde C; Brozek J; Schünemann HJ; Bossuyt PM; Leeflang MM; Langendam MW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jul; 67(7):760-8. PubMed ID: 24725643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. GRADE guidelines 32: GRADE offers guidance on choosing targets of GRADE certainty of evidence ratings.
    Zeng L; Brignardello-Petersen R; Hultcrantz M; Siemieniuk RAC; Santesso N; Traversy G; Izcovich A; Sadeghirad B; Alexander PE; Devji T; Rochwerg B; Murad MH; Morgan R; Christensen R; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Sep; 137():163-175. PubMed ID: 33857619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Certainty ranges facilitated explicit and transparent judgments regarding evidence credibility.
    Tikkinen KAO; Craigie S; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Dec; 104():46-51. PubMed ID: 30145323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. GRADE guidance 37: rating imprecision in a body of evidence on test accuracy.
    Mustafa RA; El Mikati IK; Murad MH; Hultcrantz M; Steingart KR; Yang B; Leeflang MMG; Akl EA; Dahm P; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Jan; 165():111189. PubMed ID: 38613246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains.
    Zhang Y; Coello PA; Guyatt GH; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Akl EA; Hazlewood G; Pardo-Hernandez H; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I; Qaseem A; Williams JW; Tugwell P; Flottorp S; Chang Y; Zhang Y; Mustafa RA; Rojas MX; Xie F; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():83-93. PubMed ID: 29800687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.