These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32060716)

  • 1. Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Weir-McCall JR; Joyce S; Clegg A; MacKay JW; Baxter G; Dendl LM; Rintoul RC; Qureshi NR; Miles K; Gilbert FJ
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jun; 30(6):3310-3323. PubMed ID: 32060716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic Accuracy of a Convolutional Neural Network Assessment of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules Compared With PET With CT Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced CT Imaging Using Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced CT Imaging.
    Weir-McCall JR; Debruyn E; Harris S; Qureshi NR; Rintoul RC; Gleeson FV; Gilbert FJ;
    Chest; 2023 Feb; 163(2):444-454. PubMed ID: 36087795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT compared with positron emission tomography CT to characterise solitary pulmonary nodules: the SPUtNIk diagnostic accuracy study and economic modelling.
    Gilbert FJ; Harris S; Miles KA; Weir-McCall JR; Qureshi NR; Rintoul RC; Dizdarevic S; Pike L; Sinclair D; Shah A; Eaton R; Clegg A; Benedetto V; Hill JE; Cook A; Tzelis D; Vale L; Brindle L; Madden J; Cozens K; Little LA; Eichhorst K; Moate P; McClement C; Peebles C; Banerjee A; Han S; Poon FW; Groves AM; Kurban L; Frew AJ; Callister ME; Crosbie P; Gleeson FV; Karunasaagarar K; Kankam O; George S
    Health Technol Assess; 2022 Mar; 26(17):1-180. PubMed ID: 35289267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative accuracy and cost-effectiveness of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and positron emission tomography in the characterisation of solitary pulmonary nodules.
    Gilbert FJ; Harris S; Miles KA; Weir-McCall JR; Qureshi NR; Rintoul RC; Dizdarevic S; Pike L; Sinclair D; Shah A; Eaton R; Jones J; Clegg A; Benedetto V; Hill J; Cook A; Tzelis D; Vale L; Brindle L; Madden J; Cozens K; Little L; Eichhorst K; Moate P; McClement C; Peebles C; Banerjee A; Han S; Poon FW; Groves AM; Kurban L; Frew A; Callister MEJ; Crosbie PA; Gleeson FV; Karunasaagarar K; Kankam O; George S
    Thorax; 2022 Oct; 77(10):988-996. PubMed ID: 34887348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Solitary pulmonary nodules: meta-analytic comparison of cross-sectional imaging modalities for diagnosis of malignancy.
    Cronin P; Dwamena BA; Kelly AM; Carlos RC
    Radiology; 2008 Mar; 246(3):772-82. PubMed ID: 18235105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography and positron emission tomography with 18-FDG in identifying malignant solitary pulmonary nodules.
    Dabrowska M; Krenke R; Korczynski P; Maskey-Warzechowska M; Zukowska M; Kunikowska J; Orłowski T; Chazan R
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Apr; 94(15):e666. PubMed ID: 25881842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ruilong Z; Daohai X; Li G; Xiaohong W; Chunjie W; Lei T
    Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jan; 38(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 27741214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Solitary pulmonary nodules: morphological and metabolic characterisation by FDG-PET-MDCT.
    Orlacchio A; Schillaci O; Antonelli L; D'Urso S; Sergiacomi G; Nicolì P; Simonetti G
    Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):157-73. PubMed ID: 17361379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Solitary pulmonary nodule: Comparison of quantitative capability for differentiation and management among dynamic CE-perfusion MRI at 3 T system, dynamic CE-perfusion ADCT and FDG-PET/CT.
    Ohno Y; Fujisawa Y; Yui M; Takenaka D; Koyama H; Sugihara N; Yoshikawa T
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jun; 115():22-30. PubMed ID: 31084755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10.
    Taralli S; Scolozzi V; Foti M; Ricciardi S; Forcione AR; Cardillo G; Calcagni ML
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Feb; 46(2):429-436. PubMed ID: 30535767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Solitary pulmonary nodules: Comparison of dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced perfusion area-detector CT, dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced MR imaging, and FDG PET/CT.
    Ohno Y; Nishio M; Koyama H; Seki S; Tsubakimoto M; Fujisawa Y; Yoshikawa T; Matsumoto S; Sugimura K
    Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):563-75. PubMed ID: 25203128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The value of four imaging modalities to distinguish malignant from benign solitary pulmonary nodules: a study based on 73 cohorts incorporating 7956 individuals.
    Wu Q; Zhong L; Xie X
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2021 Feb; 23(2):296-310. PubMed ID: 32548796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging versus 18F-FDG PET/CT in differentiating pulmonary lesions: an updated meta-analysis of comparative studies.
    Liu J; Xia X; Zou Q; Xie X; Lei Y; Wan Q; Li X
    BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Mar; 23(1):37. PubMed ID: 36899303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. LUCIS: lung cancer imaging studies.
    Harders SW
    Dan Med J; 2012 Nov; 59(11):B4542. PubMed ID: 23171752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standardized uptake value-based evaluations of solitary pulmonary nodules using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/computed tomography.
    Degirmenci B; Wilson D; Laymon CM; Becker C; Mason NS; Bencherif B; Agarwal A; Luketich J; Landreneau R; Avril N
    Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Jul; 29(7):614-22. PubMed ID: 18528183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic value of computed tomography scanning in differentiating malignant from benign solitary pulmonary nodules: a meta-analysis.
    Zhang CY; Yu HL; Li X; Sun YY
    Tumour Biol; 2014 Sep; 35(9):8551-8. PubMed ID: 24859887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules: A meta-analysis.
    Li ZZ; Huang YL; Song HJ; Wang YJ; Huang Y
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Mar; 97(12):e0130. PubMed ID: 29561412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic contrast enhanced CT in nodule characterization: How we review and report.
    Qureshi NR; Shah A; Eaton RJ; Miles K; Gilbert FJ;
    Cancer Imaging; 2016 Jul; 16(1):16. PubMed ID: 27430260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of different size of solitary pulmonary nodules.
    Tang K; Wang L; Lin J; Zheng X; Wu Y
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Mar; 98(11):e14813. PubMed ID: 30882661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integrated multislice CT and Tc-99m Sestamibi SPECT-CT evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules.
    Sergiacomi G; Schillaci O; Leporace M; Laviani F; Carlani M; Manni C; Danieli R; Simonetti G
    Radiol Med; 2006 Mar; 111(2):213-24. PubMed ID: 16671379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.