207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32060740)
1. Tracking the corticospinal responses to strength training.
Mason J; Frazer AK; Avela J; Pearce AJ; Howatson G; Kidgell DJ
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2020 Apr; 120(4):783-798. PubMed ID: 32060740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Training intensity-dependent increases in corticospinal but not intracortical excitability after acute strength training.
Colomer-Poveda D; Hortobágyi T; Keller M; Romero-Arenas S; Márquez G
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2020 Apr; 30(4):652-661. PubMed ID: 31785009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determining the early corticospinal-motoneuronal responses to strength training: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mason J; Frazer AK; Pearce AJ; Goodwill AM; Howatson G; Jaberzadeh S; Kidgell DJ
Rev Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 30(5):463-476. PubMed ID: 30864400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modulation of intracortical inhibition and excitation in agonist and antagonist muscles following acute strength training.
Mason J; Howatson G; Frazer AK; Pearce AJ; Jaberzadeh S; Avela J; Kidgell DJ
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2019 Oct; 119(10):2185-2199. PubMed ID: 31385029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Motor cortex excitability is not differentially modulated following skill and strength training.
Leung M; Rantalainen T; Teo WP; Kidgell D
Neuroscience; 2015 Oct; 305():99-108. PubMed ID: 26259901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An optimal protocol for measurement of corticospinal excitability, short intracortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation in the rectus femoris.
Brownstein CG; Ansdell P; Škarabot J; Howatson G; Goodall S; Thomas K
J Neurol Sci; 2018 Nov; 394():45-56. PubMed ID: 30216757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determining the Corticospinal Responses to Single Bouts of Skill and Strength Training.
Mason J; Frazer AK; Jaberzadeh S; Ahtiainen JP; Avela J; Rantalainen T; Leung M; Kidgell DJ
J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Sep; 33(9):2299-2307. PubMed ID: 31343552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The minimal number of TMS trials required for the reliable assessment of corticospinal excitability, short interval intracortical inhibition, and intracortical facilitation.
Biabani M; Farrell M; Zoghi M; Egan G; Jaberzadeh S
Neurosci Lett; 2018 May; 674():94-100. PubMed ID: 29551425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of inhibitory and facilitatory intracortical circuits on interhemispheric inhibition in the human motor cortex.
Lee H; Gunraj C; Chen R
J Physiol; 2007 May; 580(Pt.3):1021-32. PubMed ID: 17303638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of acute resistance training modality on corticospinal excitability, intra-cortical and neuromuscular responses.
Latella C; Teo WP; Harris D; Major B; VanderWesthuizen D; Hendy AM
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2017 Nov; 117(11):2211-2224. PubMed ID: 28879576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anodal tDCS applied during strength training enhances motor cortical plasticity.
Hendy AM; Kidgell DJ
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2013 Sep; 45(9):1721-9. PubMed ID: 23470308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Corticospinal responses following strength training: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kidgell DJ; Bonanno DR; Frazer AK; Howatson G; Pearce AJ
Eur J Neurosci; 2017 Dec; 46(11):2648-2661. PubMed ID: 28921683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The ipsilateral corticospinal responses to cross-education are dependent upon the motor-training intervention.
Leung M; Rantalainen T; Teo WP; Kidgell D
Exp Brain Res; 2018 May; 236(5):1331-1346. PubMed ID: 29511785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The corticospinal responses of metronome-paced, but not self-paced strength training are similar to motor skill training.
Leung M; Rantalainen T; Teo WP; Kidgell D
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2017 Dec; 117(12):2479-2492. PubMed ID: 29018949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determination of anodal tDCS duration threshold for reversal of corticospinal excitability: An investigation for induction of counter-regulatory mechanisms.
Hassanzahraee M; Nitsche MA; Zoghi M; Jaberzadeh S
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(3):832-839. PubMed ID: 32289714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Priming the Motor Cortex With Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Affects the Acute Inhibitory Corticospinal Responses to Strength Training.
Frazer AK; Howatson G; Ahtiainen JP; Avela J; Rantalainen T; Kidgell DJ
J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Feb; 33(2):307-317. PubMed ID: 30688872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increased cross-education of muscle strength and reduced corticospinal inhibition following eccentric strength training.
Kidgell DJ; Frazer AK; Daly RM; Rantalainen T; Ruotsalainen I; Ahtiainen J; Avela J; Howatson G
Neuroscience; 2015 Aug; 300():566-75. PubMed ID: 26037804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeated cathodal transspinal pulse and direct current stimulation modulate cortical and corticospinal excitability differently in healthy humans.
Murray LM; Knikou M
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Jul; 237(7):1841-1852. PubMed ID: 31079235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Corticospinal and intracortical excitability is modulated in the knee extensors after acute strength training.
Alibazi RJ; Frazer AK; Pearce AJ; Tallent J; Avela J; Kidgell DJ
J Sports Sci; 2022 Mar; 40(5):561-570. PubMed ID: 34796778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short-term immobilization influences use-dependent cortical plasticity and fine motor performance.
Opie GM; Evans A; Ridding MC; Semmler JG
Neuroscience; 2016 Aug; 330():247-56. PubMed ID: 27282084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
