379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32061002)
1. Low-Dose, Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared to Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A Feasibility Study.
Clauser P; Baltzer PAT; Kapetas P; Hoernig M; Weber M; Leone F; Bernathova M; Helbich TH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):589-595. PubMed ID: 32061002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-enhanced Mammography versus Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Pötsch N; Vatteroni G; Clauser P; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Radiology; 2022 Oct; 305(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 36154284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Performance of MRI, Molecular Breast Imaging, and Contrast-enhanced Mammography in Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.
Sumkin JH; Berg WA; Carter GJ; Bandos AI; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Kelly AE; Zuley ML; Houshmand G; Anello MI; Gur D
Radiology; 2019 Dec; 293(3):531-540. PubMed ID: 31660801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic contrast-enhanced mammography and breast MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer and detection of tumor size.
Tekinhatun M; Sabir N; Erdem E; Yilmaz S; Ufuk F
Turk J Med Sci; 2024; 54(1):249-261. PubMed ID: 38812642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast lesion detection and characterization with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: Prospective randomized intraindividual comparison of gadoterate meglumine (0.15 mmol/kg) and gadobenate dimeglumine (0.075 mmol/kg) at 3T.
Clauser P; Helbich TH; Kapetas P; Pinker K; Bernathova M; Woitek R; Kaneider A; Baltzer PAT
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Apr; 49(4):1157-1165. PubMed ID: 30552829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT (CBBCT): clinical performance compared to mammography and MRI.
Wienbeck S; Fischer U; Luftner-Nagel S; Lotz J; Uhlig J
Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3731-3741. PubMed ID: 29594402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utility of MRI-Directed Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Biopsy Planning for Suspicious MRI-Detected Breast Lesions.
Nida BA; Rooney TB; Miller MM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Feb; 220(2):202-211. PubMed ID: 36000664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative Performance of Contrast-enhanced Mammography, Abbreviated Breast MRI, and Standard Breast MRI for Breast Cancer Screening.
Lawson MB; Partridge SC; Hippe DS; Rahbar H; Lam DL; Lee CI; Lowry KP; Scheel JR; Parsian S; Li I; Biswas D; Bryant ML; Lee JM
Radiology; 2023 Aug; 308(2):e230576. PubMed ID: 37581498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving the Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast BI-RADS 4 Microcalcification-Only Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
Long R; Cao K; Cao M; Li XT; Gao F; Zhang FD; Yu YZ; Sun YS
Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(3):256-262.e2. PubMed ID: 33243676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of single-view contrast-enhanced mammography as novel reading strategy: a non-inferiority feasibility study.
Lobbes MBI; Hecker J; Houben IPL; Pluymakers R; Jeukens C; Laji UC; Gommers S; Wildberger JE; Nelemans PJ
Eur Radiol; 2019 Nov; 29(11):6211-6219. PubMed ID: 31073859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-enhanced mammography in the assessment of residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment.
Hogan MP; Horvat JV; Ross DS; Sevilimedu V; Jochelson MS; Kirstein LJ; Goldfarb SB; Comstock CE; Sung JS
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Apr; 198(2):349-359. PubMed ID: 36754936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of contrast-enhanced mammography combined with the Kaiser score for clinical decision-making regarding tomosynthesis BI-RADS 4A lesions.
Rong X; Kang Y; Xue J; Han P; Li Z; Yang G; Shi G
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7439-7447. PubMed ID: 35639141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis--Comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI.
Chou CP; Lewin JM; Chiang CL; Hung BH; Yang TL; Huang JS; Liao JB; Pan HB
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2501-8. PubMed ID: 26456307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Value of breast MRI for patients with a biopsy showing atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH).
Tsuchiya K; Mori N; Schacht DV; Sheth D; Karczmar GS; Newstead GM; Abe H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1738-1747. PubMed ID: 28295791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) versus MRI for breast cancer staging: detection of additional malignant lesions not seen on conventional imaging.
Taylor DB; Burrows S; Saunders CM; Parizel PM; Ives A
Eur Radiol Exp; 2023 Feb; 7(1):8. PubMed ID: 36781808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast masses with rim enhancement on contrast-enhanced mammography: morphological and enhancement features for diagnosis and differentiation of benign and malignant.
Wen C; Wang S; Ma M; Xu Z; Zeng F; Zeng H; Liao X; He Z; Xu W; Chen W
Br J Radiol; 2024 May; 97(1157):1016-1021. PubMed ID: 38521539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-enhanced Mammography: Comparison With MRI and Mammography.
Yüzkan S; Cengiz D; Hekimsoy İ; Sezgin Okçu Ö; Oktay A
J Breast Imaging; 2021 Aug; 3(4):448-454. PubMed ID: 38424791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multireader comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography versus the combination of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Girometti R; Linda A; Conte P; Lorenzon M; De Serio I; Jerman K; Londero V; Zuiani C
Radiol Med; 2021 Nov; 126(11):1407-1414. PubMed ID: 34302599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
