These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32061572)

  • 1. Computerized optical impression making of edentulous jaws - An in vivo feasibility study.
    Hack G; Liberman L; Vach K; Tchorz JP; Kohal RJ; Patzelt SBM
    J Prosthodont Res; 2020 Oct; 64(4):444-453. PubMed ID: 32061572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital vs Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Retrospective Analysis of 36 Edentulous Jaws.
    Papaspyridakos P; De Souza A; Finkelman M; Sicilia E; Gotsis S; Chen YW; Vazouras K; Chochlidakis K
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(4):325-330. PubMed ID: 35524647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional differences between intraoral scans and conventional impressions of edentulous jaws: A clinical study.
    Lo Russo L; Caradonna G; Troiano G; Salamini A; Guida L; Ciavarella D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):264-268. PubMed ID: 31153614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes.
    Papaspyridakos P; Gallucci GO; Chen CJ; Hanssen S; Naert I; Vandenberghe B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Apr; 27(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 25682892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study.
    Alshawaf B; Weber HP; Finkelman M; El Rafie K; Kudara Y; Papaspyridakos P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Aug; 29(8):835-842. PubMed ID: 29926977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
    Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative clinical study on the transfer accuracy of conventional and digital implant impressions using a new reference key-based method.
    Schmidt A; Rein PE; Wöstmann B; Schlenz MA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Apr; 32(4):460-469. PubMed ID: 33469983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital Versus Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Prospective Study on 16 Edentulous Maxillae.
    Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P; Tsigarida A; Romeo D; Chen YW; Natto Z; Ercoli C
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Apr; 29(4):281-286. PubMed ID: 32166793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Technique for Digital Impression and Bite Registration for a Single Edentulous Arch.
    Fang Y; Fang JH; Jeong SM; Choi BH
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e519-e523. PubMed ID: 29522269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study.
    Amin S; Weber HP; Finkelman M; El Rafie K; Kudara Y; Papaspyridakos P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1360-1367. PubMed ID: 28039903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy evaluation of intraoral optical impressions: A clinical study using a reference appliance.
    Atieh MA; Ritter AV; Ko CC; Duqum I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):400-405. PubMed ID: 28222869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for partially edentulous arches: An evaluation of accuracy.
    Marghalani A; Weber HP; Finkelman M; Kudara Y; El Rafie K; Papaspyridakos P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Apr; 119(4):574-579. PubMed ID: 28927923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: an optical scanning study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Benic GI; Hogsett VL; White GS; Lal K; Gallucci GO
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jun; 23(6):676-681. PubMed ID: 21631595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital assessment of preliminary impression accuracy for edentulous jaws: Comparisons of 3-dimensional surfaces between study and working casts.
    Matsuda T; Goto T; Kurahashi K; Kashiwabara T; Watanabe M; Tomotake Y; Nagao K; Ichikawa T
    J Prosthodont Res; 2016 Jul; 60(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 26822762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Edentulous jaw impression techniques: An in vivo comparison of trueness.
    Chebib N; Kalberer N; Srinivasan M; Maniewicz S; Perneger T; Müller F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):623-630. PubMed ID: 30580982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feasibility and Accuracy of Digitizing Edentulous Maxillectomy Defects: A Comparative Study.
    Elbashti ME; Hattori M; Patzelt SB; Schulze D; Sumita YI; Taniguchi H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(2):147-149. PubMed ID: 28267823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraoral optical impression versus conventional impression for fully edentulous maxilla: an in vivo comparative study.
    Willmann C; Deschamps A; Taddei-Gross C; Musset AM; Lai C; Etienne O
    Int J Comput Dent; 2024 Mar; 27(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 36815624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible.
    Hayama H; Fueki K; Wadachi J; Wakabayashi N
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jul; 62(3):347-352. PubMed ID: 29502933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods.
    Cho SH; Schaefer O; Thompson GA; Guentsch A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 25682531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dimensional accuracy of microcomputed tomography-scanned half-arch impressions.
    Kerr M; Park N; Leeson D; Nikolskiy S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):797-802. PubMed ID: 30617030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.