These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3206184)

  • 1. Effect of band-limited clicks on ABR waves I and V.
    Zerlin S
    Scand Audiol; 1988; 17(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 3206184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Brainstem response (ABR) to rarefaction and condensation clicks in normal hearing and steep high-frequency hearing loss.
    Borg E; Löfqvist L
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1981; 13():99-101. PubMed ID: 6944785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Binaural interaction in the auditory brainstem response: a normative study.
    Van Yper LN; Vermeire K; De Vel EF; Battmer RD; Dhooge IJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 126(4):772-9. PubMed ID: 25240247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Binaural interaction in human auditory brainstem evoked potentials.
    Wrege KS; Starr A
    Arch Neurol; 1981 Sep; 38(9):572-80. PubMed ID: 7271536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of ABR stimuli for the early detection of ototoxicity: conventional clicks compared with high frequency clicks and single frequency tonebursts.
    Fausti SA; Flick CL; Bobal AM; Ellingson RM; Henry JA; Mitchell CR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2003 Jul; 14(5):239-50; quiz 281-2. PubMed ID: 12956307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of auditory brain stem responses elicited by click and chirp stimuli in adults with normal hearing and sensory hearing loss.
    Maloff ES; Hood LJ
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):271-82. PubMed ID: 24441741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analogue and digital filtering of auditory brainstem responses.
    Doyle DJ; Hyde ML
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 7280545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory brainstem response in dolphins.
    Ridgway SH; Bullock TH; Carder DA; Seeley RL; Woods D; Galambos R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1981 Mar; 78(3):1943-7. PubMed ID: 6940199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monaural versus binaural auditory brainstem response threshold to clicks masked by high-pass noise in normal-hearing subjects.
    Conijn EA; Brocaar MP; van Zanten GA
    Audiology; 1990; 29(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 2310351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [ABR short latency negative responses in neonates].
    Zagólski O
    Przegl Lek; 2005; 62(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 16053214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory brainstem responses to CE-Chirp® stimuli for normal ears and those with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Cho SW; Han KH; Jang HK; Chang SO; Jung H; Lee JH
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):700-4. PubMed ID: 25997814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The frequency specificity of tone-pip evoked auditory brain stem responses.
    Kileny P
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(6):270-5. PubMed ID: 7308602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of click-evoked auditory brainstem responses using time domain cross-correlations between interleaved responses.
    Berninger E; Olofsson A; Leijon A
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):318-29. PubMed ID: 24557002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of click polarity on ABR peak latency and morphology in a clinical population.
    Pijl S
    J Otolaryngol; 1987 Mar; 16(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 3599162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). II: Effects of broadband noise level and high-pass masker cutoff frequency across click polarity.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2526-36. PubMed ID: 2745877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). I: Effects of click level, rate, and polarity.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2514-25. PubMed ID: 2745876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. I. Effect of response filtering and waveform identification. II. Threshold responses to a 500-HZ tone pip.
    Kavanagh KT; Harker LA; Tyler RS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1984; 108():1-12. PubMed ID: 6421220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory brain stem potentials evoked by clicks in notch-filtered masking noise.
    Pratt H; Bleich N
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1982 Apr; 53(4):417-26. PubMed ID: 6175503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between auditory brain stem responses evoked by rarefaction and condensation step functions and clicks.
    Tietze G; Pantev C
    Audiology; 1986; 25(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 3954683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interaction of click polarity, stimulus level, and repetition rate on the auditory brainstem response.
    Beattie RC
    Scand Audiol; 1988; 17(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 3187380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.