156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32062329)
1. Belgian multicentre study on lumbar spine imaging: Radiation dose and cost analysis; Evaluation of compliance with recommendations for efficient use of medical imaging.
De Roo B; Hoste P; Stichelbaut N; Annemans L; Bacher K; Verstraete K
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Apr; 125():108864. PubMed ID: 32062329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Justification and active guideline implementation for spine radiography referrals in primary care.
Tahvonen P; Oikarinen H; Niinimäki J; Liukkonen E; Mattila S; Tervonen O
Acta Radiol; 2017 May; 58(5):586-592. PubMed ID: 27609905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effective and collective dose to patients undergoing abdominopelvic and trunk computed tomography examinations: A Belgian multicentre study.
De Roo B; Stichelbaut N; Hoste P; Verstraete K; Bacher K
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Feb; 111():81-87. PubMed ID: 30691670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unjustified CT examinations in young patients.
Oikarinen H; Meriläinen S; Pääkkö E; Karttunen A; Nieminen MT; Tervonen O
Eur Radiol; 2009 May; 19(5):1161-5. PubMed ID: 19156425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Primary care referrals for lumbar spine radiography: diagnostic yield and clinical guidelines.
Hollingworth W; Todd CJ; King H; Males T; Dixon AK; Karia KR; Kinmonth AL
Br J Gen Pract; 2002 Jun; 52(479):475-80. PubMed ID: 12051212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of interventions on appropriate use of lumbar spine radiograph and CT examinations in young adults and children: a three-year follow-up.
Tahvonen P; Oikarinen H; Tervonen O
Acta Radiol; 2020 Aug; 61(8):1042-1049. PubMed ID: 31865752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. When does a radiologist's recommendation for follow-up result in high-cost imaging?
Lee SI; Krishnaraj A; Chatterji M; Dreyer KJ; Thrall JH; Hahn PF
Radiology; 2012 Feb; 262(2):544-9. PubMed ID: 22084210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Lumbar spine radiography – unreliable diagnostic accuracy and negligible value for the patients].
Annertz M; Andrén-Sandberg Å; Aspelin P; Fridén T; Geijer M; Nyman U
Lakartidningen; 2017 Nov; 114():. PubMed ID: 29292917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing Appropriateness of CT and MRI Referrals for Headache and Lumbar: A Canadian Perspective on Patient-Centered Referrals.
Khoury M; Tolentino M; Haj-Ahmad Z; Lilek C; Law MP
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Dec; 50(4):506-513. PubMed ID: 31734105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the appropriateness of requested radiological examinations for outpatients and the potential financial consequences of guideline application.
Van Breuseghem I; Geusens E
JBR-BTR; 2006; 89(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 16607870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR imaging as the primary modality for neuroradiologic evaluation of the lumbar spine. Effects on cost and number of examinations.
Annertz M; Wingstrand H; Strömqvist B; Holtås S
Acta Radiol; 1996 May; 37(3 Pt 1):373-80. PubMed ID: 8845272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rates, costs and determinants of lumbar spine imaging in population-based women born in 1973-1978: Data from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health.
Wang Y; Hussain SM; Wluka AE; Lim YZ; Urquhart DM; Mishra GD; Teede H; Doust J; Brown WJ; Cicuttini FM
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243282. PubMed ID: 33270739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of imaging utilization prior to referral of musculoskeletal tumors: a prospective study.
Nystrom LM; Reimer NB; Dean CW; Bush CH; Scarborough MT; Gibbs CP
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Jan; 97(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 25568389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determining the Prevalence and Costs of Unnecessary Referrals in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
Meirick T; Shah AS; Dolan LA; Weinstein SL
Iowa Orthop J; 2019; 39(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 31413675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of lumbar spine radiography in primary care patients with low back pain.
Miller P; Kendrick D; Bentley E; Fielding K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Oct; 27(20):2291-7. PubMed ID: 12394910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Appropriateness of lumbar spine referrals to a neurosurgical service.
Deis N; Findlay JM
Can J Neurol Sci; 2010 Nov; 37(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 21059549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of IT-enabled intervention on MRI use for back pain.
Ip IK; Gershanik EF; Schneider LI; Raja AS; Mar W; Seltzer S; Healey MJ; Khorasani R
Am J Med; 2014 Jun; 127(6):512-8.e1. PubMed ID: 24513065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeat abdominal imaging examinations in a tertiary care hospital.
Ip IK; Mortele KJ; Prevedello LM; Khorasani R
Am J Med; 2012 Feb; 125(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 22269618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of iterative reconstruction on image quality of low-dose CT of the lumbar spine.
Alshamari M; Geijer M; Norrman E; Lidén M; Krauss W; Jendeberg J; Magnuson A; Geijer H
Acta Radiol; 2017 Jun; 58(6):702-709. PubMed ID: 28157395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomised clinical trial of routine versus selective CT imaging in acute abdomen: Impact of patient age on treatment costs and hospital resource use.
Lehtimäki TT; Valtonen H; Miettinen P; Juvonen P; Paajanen H; Vanninen R
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Feb; 87():1-7. PubMed ID: 28065368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
