These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32062723)

  • 1. Diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infections with molecular diagnostics: multicenter evaluation of revogene C. difficile assay.
    Sambri V; Gateau C; Zannoli S; Dirani G; Couturier J; Op den Buijs I; Roymans R; Hallet E; Arnold M; Zumoberhaus A; Steiner S; van de Bovenkamp J; Altwegg M; Berlinger L; Barbut F;
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2020 Jun; 39(6):1169-1175. PubMed ID: 32062723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Multicenter Study of the Revogene C. difficile System for Detection of the Toxin B Gene from Unformed Stool Specimens.
    Mashock MJ; Faron ML; Carroll KC; Dang C; Lewis S; Salimnia H; Lephart P; Loo VG; Schmitt BH; Young S; Buchan BW; Ledeboer NA
    J Clin Microbiol; 2020 Jan; 58(2):. PubMed ID: 31776191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the cobas Cdiff Test for Detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in Stool Samples.
    Peterson LR; Young SA; Davis TE; Wang ZX; Duncan J; Noutsios C; Liesenfeld O; Osiecki JC; Lewinski MA
    J Clin Microbiol; 2017 Dec; 55(12):3426-3436. PubMed ID: 28954901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid detection assay of toxigenic Clostridioides difficile through PathOC RightGene, a novel high-speed polymerase chain reaction device.
    Okanda T; Mitsutake H; Aso R; Sekizawa R; Takemura H; Matsumoto T; Nakamura S
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2021 Feb; 99(2):115247. PubMed ID: 33188946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for detection of Clostridioides difficile infection: A prospective diagnostic performance study.
    Girão ES; Vásconez Noguera SL; Sanchez Espinoza EP; Pereira Alves Madeira Bezerra CL; Lino FM; Côrtes MF; Alves Dos Santos S; Paranhos-Baccala G; Perdigão Neto LV; Costa SF
    Anaerobe; 2021 Oct; 71():102410. PubMed ID: 34174401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Premarket evaluations of the IMDx C. difficile for Abbott m2000 Assay and the BD Max Cdiff Assay.
    Stellrecht KA; Espino AA; Maceira VP; Nattanmai SM; Butt SA; Wroblewski D; Hannett GE; Musser KA
    J Clin Microbiol; 2014 May; 52(5):1423-8. PubMed ID: 24554744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multicenter evaluation of the Quidel Lyra Direct C. difficile nucleic acid amplification assay.
    Beck ET; Buchan BW; Riebe KM; Alkins BR; Pancholi P; Granato PA; Ledeboer NA
    J Clin Microbiol; 2014 Jun; 52(6):1998-2002. PubMed ID: 24671790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of cobas® Liat® Cdiff, STANDARD™ M10 C. difficile and Xpert® C. difficile BT assays for rapid detection of toxigenic Clostridioides difficile.
    Suominen J; Korhonen S; Kutvonen H; Jarva H; Pätäri-Sampo A; Loginov R
    J Microbiol Methods; 2024 Nov; 226():107043. PubMed ID: 39277020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections.
    Lalande V; Barrault L; Wadel S; Eckert C; Petit JC; Barbut F
    J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Jul; 49(7):2714-6. PubMed ID: 21525213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a new automated homogeneous PCR assay, GenomEra C. difficile, for rapid detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in fecal specimens.
    Hirvonen JJ; Mentula S; Kaukoranta SS
    J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Sep; 51(9):2908-12. PubMed ID: 23804386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of the STANDARD M10 and Xpert
    Lee H-W; Yu H-J; Kim H; Yun SA; Suh E; Kang M; Kim TY; Huh HJ; Lee NY
    J Clin Microbiol; 2024 Jul; 62(7):e0052424. PubMed ID: 38934589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of C. difficile toxin as a model assay for performing fully automated high-throughput RT-PCR on clinical stool samples.
    Eigner U; Nörz D; Reucher S; Furrer J; Sun J; Chu K; Kolb M; Hefner N; Pfefferle S; Lütgehetmann M
    J Microbiol Methods; 2020 May; 172():105882. PubMed ID: 32119956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multicenter evaluation of the Verigene Clostridium difficile nucleic acid assay.
    Carroll KC; Buchan BW; Tan S; Stamper PD; Riebe KM; Pancholi P; Kelly C; Rao A; Fader R; Cavagnolo R; Watson W; Goering RV; Trevino EA; Weissfeld AS; Ledeboer NA
    J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Dec; 51(12):4120-5. PubMed ID: 24088862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multicenter clinical evaluation of the portrait toxigenic C. difficile assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile strains in clinical stool specimens.
    Buchan BW; Mackey TL; Daly JA; Alger G; Denys GA; Peterson LR; Kehl SC; Ledeboer NA
    J Clin Microbiol; 2012 Dec; 50(12):3932-6. PubMed ID: 23015667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of strain type on detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of molecular diagnostic and enzyme immunoassay approaches.
    Tenover FC; Novak-Weekley S; Woods CW; Peterson LR; Davis T; Schreckenberger P; Fang FC; Dascal A; Gerding DN; Nomura JH; Goering RV; Akerlund T; Weissfeld AS; Baron EJ; Wong E; Marlowe EM; Whitmore J; Persing DH
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Oct; 48(10):3719-24. PubMed ID: 20702676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and evaluation of a rapid visual loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the
    Lin M; Wang P; Lu B; Jin M; Tan J; Liu W; Yuan J; Peng X; Chen Y
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17776. PubMed ID: 39224820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Illumigene, Simplexa, and AmpliVue Clostridium difficile molecular assays for diagnosis of C. difficile infection.
    Deak E; Miller SA; Humphries RM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2014 Mar; 52(3):960-3. PubMed ID: 24352999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of two commercial molecular assays to a laboratory-developed molecular assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
    Karre T; Sloan L; Patel R; Mandrekar J; Rosenblatt J
    J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Feb; 49(2):725-7. PubMed ID: 21123537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification compared to real-time PCR and enzyme immunoassay for toxigenic Clostridium difficile detection.
    Boyanton BL; Sural P; Loomis CR; Pesta C; Gonzalez-Krellwitz L; Robinson-Dunn B; Riska P
    J Clin Microbiol; 2012 Mar; 50(3):640-5. PubMed ID: 22189114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff and Seegene Seeplex ACE PCR assays using toxigenic Clostridium difficile culture for direct detection of tcdB from stool specimens.
    Shin BM; Mun SJ; Yoo SJ; Kuak EY
    J Clin Microbiol; 2012 Nov; 50(11):3765-7. PubMed ID: 22952270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.