These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32062812)

  • 21. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic apical suspension: description of the spiral technique.
    Davila HH; Brown K; Dara P; Bruce L; Goodman L; Gallo T
    J Robot Surg; 2019 Jun; 13(3):519-523. PubMed ID: 30284113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The use of 3D ultrasound in comparing surgical techniques for posterior wall prolapse repair: a pilot randomised controlled trial.
    Derpapas A; Vijaya G; Nikolopoulos K; Nikolopoulos M; Robinson D; Fernando R; Khullar V
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 May; 41(4):594-600. PubMed ID: 32851902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Vaginal Sacral Colpopexy: A Natural Orifice Approach to a Gold Standard Procedure.
    Hanes CR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 28642090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Laparoscopic management of pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after open sacrocervicopexy.
    Grinstein E; Gluck O; Veit-Rubin N; Deval B
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Sep; 31(9):1965-1968. PubMed ID: 32222793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal apical prolapse: evidence-based surgery.
    Parkes IL; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):546-57. PubMed ID: 24462593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
    Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy.
    Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pelvic floor surgery: Review.
    Daykan Y; Rotem R; O'Reilly BA
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Dec; 91():102418. PubMed ID: 37776580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Outcomes of robotically assisted laparoscopic lateral suspension (RALLS) with mesh for anterior and apical prolapse.
    Dällenbach P; Alec M; Boulvain M; Shabanov S
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Apr; 16(2):287-294. PubMed ID: 33821406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Long-Term Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Using Lightweight Y-Mesh.
    Culligan PJ; Lewis C; Priestley J; Mushonga N
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Mar; 26(3):202-206. PubMed ID: 31688526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mesh Exposure After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pelvic Floor Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.
    van Zanten F; van Iersel JJ; Hartog FE; Aalders KIM; Lenters E; Broeders IAMJ; Schraffordt Koops SE
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(4):636-642. PubMed ID: 29964179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A randomized controlled trial comparing fascia lata and synthetic mesh for sacral colpopexy.
    Culligan PJ; Blackwell L; Goldsmith LJ; Graham CA; Rogers A; Heit MH
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jul; 106(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 15994614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical prolapse: a case-control study.
    Cucinella G; Calagna G; Romano G; Di Buono G; Gugliotta G; Saitta S; Adile G; Manzone M; Accardi G; Perino A; Agrusa A
    G Chir; 2016; 37(3):113-117. PubMed ID: 27734794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Robotic-assisted apical lateral suspension for advanced pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and perioperative outcomes.
    Simoncini T; Russo E; Mannella P; Giannini A
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5647-5655. PubMed ID: 27287895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Long-term follow-up and quality of life after robot assisted sacrohysteropexy.
    Grimminck K; Mourik SL; Tjin-Asjoe F; Martens J; Aktas M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():27-31. PubMed ID: 27614268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.
    Geoffrion R; Larouche M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Apr; 43(4):511-523.e1. PubMed ID: 33548503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Technical features, perioperative and anatomical outcomes of a standardized suturing pattern for robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Giannini A; Russo E; Misasi G; Falcone M; Caretto M; Morganti R; Mannella P; Simoncini T
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Nov; 33(11):3085-3092. PubMed ID: 35037972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Robot-assisted Transvaginal Single-site Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Guan X; Guan Z; Koythong T; Liu J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 28(6):1141. PubMed ID: 33249270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Robot-assisted surgery for the management of apical prolapse: a bi-centre prospective cohort study.
    van Zanten F; Schraffordt Koops SE; O'Sullivan OE; Lenters E; Broeders I; O'Reilly BA
    BJOG; 2019 Jul; 126(8):1065-1073. PubMed ID: 30924606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sexual function after robot-assisted prolapse surgery: a prospective study.
    van Zanten F; Brem C; Lenters E; Broeders IAMJ; Schraffordt Koops SE
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):905-912. PubMed ID: 29687171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.