169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32062995)
1. Characteristics of Invasive Breast Cancer Detected by Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Screening and Diagnostic Mammograms.
Baydoun SE; Yang L; Xiong J; Fajardo LL
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2021 May; 72(2):242-250. PubMed ID: 32062995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Axilla View of Mammography in Preoperative Axillary Lymph Node Evaluation of Breast Cancer Patients: A Pilot Study.
Wang J; Di W; Shi K; Wang S; Jiang Y; Xu W; Zhong Z; Pan H; Xie H; Zhou W; Zhao M; Wang S
Clin Breast Cancer; 2024 Feb; 24(2):e51-e60. PubMed ID: 37925360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Early clinical experience with digital breast tomosynthesis for screening mammography.
Durand MA; Haas BM; Yao X; Geisel JL; Raghu M; Hooley RJ; Horvath LJ; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 25188431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammographically detected breast cancers and the risk of axillary lymph node involvement: is it just the tumor size?
Heimann R; Munsell M; McBride R
Cancer J; 2002; 8(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 12074328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast cancer detection using single-reading of breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) compared to double-reading of 2D-mammography: Evidence from a population-based trial.
Houssami N; Bernardi D; Pellegrini M; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Tuttobene P; Luparia A; Macaskill P
Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 47():94-99. PubMed ID: 28192742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of visibility of circumscribed masses on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) and 2D mammography: are circumscribed masses better visualized and assured of being benign on DBT?
Nakashima K; Uematsu T; Itoh T; Takahashi K; Nishimura S; Hayashi T; Sugino T
Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):570-577. PubMed ID: 27236817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast screening using 2D-mammography or integrating digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) for single-reading or double-reading--evidence to guide future screening strategies.
Houssami N; Macaskill P; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Ciatto S
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jul; 50(10):1799-1807. PubMed ID: 24746887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study.
Bernardi D; Macaskill P; Pellegrini M; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Tuttobene P; Luparia A; Houssami N
Lancet Oncol; 2016 Aug; 17(8):1105-1113. PubMed ID: 27345635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Montemezzi S; Macaskill P
Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jun; 14(7):583-9. PubMed ID: 23623721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The "Sweet Spot" Revisited: Optimal Recall Rates for Cancer Detection With 2D and 3D Digital Screening Mammography in the Metro Chicago Breast Cancer Registry.
Rauscher GH; Murphy AM; Qiu Q; Dolecek TA; Tossas K; Liu Y; Alsheik NH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Apr; 216(4):894-902. PubMed ID: 33566635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Tubular carcinoma of the breast: mode of presentation, mammographic appearance, and frequency of nodal metastases.
Elson BC; Helvie MA; Frank TS; Wilson TE; Adler DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Dec; 161(6):1173-6. PubMed ID: 8249721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Axillary Nodal Metastases in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Versus Invasive Ductal Carcinoma: Comparison of Node Detection and Morphology by Ultrasound.
Chung HL; Tso HH; Middleton LP; Sun J; Leung JWT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jan; 218(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 34319162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incremental effect from integrating 3D-mammography (tomosynthesis) with 2D-mammography: Increased breast cancer detection evident for screening centres in a population-based trial.
Caumo F; Bernardi D; Ciatto S; Macaskill P; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Montemezzi S; Houssami N
Breast; 2014 Feb; 23(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 24316152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of ultrasound and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in determining benign and malignant breast lesions using pathology as a gold standard, in 102 Chinese women.
Yang L; Zhou C
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 30843008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determinants for non-sentinel node metastases in primary invasive breast cancer: a population-based cohort study of 602 consecutive patients with sentinel node metastases.
Majid S; Rydén L; Manjer J
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):626. PubMed ID: 31238899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of performance metrics with digital 2D versus tomosynthesis mammography in the diagnostic setting.
Bahl M; Mercaldo S; Vijapura CA; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD
Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):477-484. PubMed ID: 29967957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Axillary node metastasis from T1N0M0 breast cancer: possible avoidance of dissection in a subgroup.
Iwasaki Y; Fukutomi T; Akashi-Tanaka S; Nanasawa T; Tsuda H
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1998 Oct; 28(10):601-3. PubMed ID: 9839499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of integrating 3D-mammography (digital breast tomosynthesis) with 2D-mammography on radiologists' true-positive and false-positive detection in a population breast screening trial.
Bernardi D; Caumo F; Macaskill P; Ciatto S; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Montemezzi S; Houssami N
Eur J Cancer; 2014 May; 50(7):1232-8. PubMed ID: 24582915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiological imaging features of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast and axillary lymph nodes.
Kubota K; Ogawa Y; Nishioka A; Murata Y; Itoh S; Hamada N; Morio K; Maeda H; Tanaka Y
Oncol Rep; 2008 Nov; 20(5):1143-7. PubMed ID: 18949414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
