BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32063318)

  • 1. The potential of Turkey's province-based livestock sector to mitigate GHG emissions through biogas production.
    Ersoy E; Ugurlu A
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Feb; 255():109858. PubMed ID: 32063318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).
    Bogner J; Pipatti R; Hashimoto S; Diaz C; Mareckova K; Diaz L; Kjeldsen P; Monni S; Faaij A; Gao Q; Zhang T; Ahmed MA; Sutamihardja RT; Gregory R;
    Waste Manag Res; 2008 Feb; 26(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 18338699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mitigating the environmental impacts of milk production via anaerobic digestion of manure: case study of a dairy farm in the Po Valley.
    Battini F; Agostini A; Boulamanti AK; Giuntoli J; Amaducci S
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 May; 481():196-208. PubMed ID: 24598150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New York Dairy Manure Management Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Mitigation Costs (1992-2022).
    Wightman JL; Woodbury PB
    J Environ Qual; 2016 Jan; 45(1):266-75. PubMed ID: 26828182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mitigating Greenhouse Gas and Ammonia Emissions from Beef Cattle Feedlot Production: A System Meta-Analysis.
    Wang Y; Li X; Yang J; Tian Z; Sun Q; Xue W; Dong H
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Oct; 52(19):11232-11242. PubMed ID: 30119602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Greenhouse gas emissions from liquid dairy manure: Prediction and mitigation.
    Petersen SO
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jul; 101(7):6642-6654. PubMed ID: 29224872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anaerobic digestion of different feedstocks: impact on energetic and environmental balances of biogas process.
    Bacenetti J; Negri M; Fiala M; González-García S
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Oct; 463-464():541-51. PubMed ID: 23831800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technical options for the mitigation of direct methane and nitrous oxide emissions from livestock: a review.
    Gerber PJ; Hristov AN; Henderson B; Makkar H; Oh J; Lee C; Meinen R; Montes F; Ott T; Firkins J; Rotz A; Dell C; Adesogan AT; Yang WZ; Tricarico JM; Kebreab E; Waghorn G; Dijkstra J; Oosting S
    Animal; 2013 Jun; 7 Suppl 2():220-34. PubMed ID: 23739465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from Indian livestock.
    Patra AK
    J Environ Monit; 2012 Oct; 14(10):2673-84. PubMed ID: 22898933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methane emission from global livestock sector during 1890-2014: Magnitude, trends and spatiotemporal patterns.
    Dangal SRS; Tian H; Zhang B; Pan S; Lu C; Yang J
    Glob Chang Biol; 2017 Oct; 23(10):4147-4161. PubMed ID: 28370720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A review of mitigation technologies and management strategies for greenhouse gas and air pollutant emissions in livestock production.
    Yan X; Ying Y; Li K; Zhang Q; Wang K
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Feb; 352():120028. PubMed ID: 38219668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Energy and emission benefits of chicken manure biogas production: a case study.
    Ulusoy Y; Ulukardesler AH; Arslan R; Tekin Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Mar; 28(10):12351-12356. PubMed ID: 30374721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring greenhouse gas mitigation strategies for agriculture in Africa: The case of Nigeria.
    Dioha MO; Kumar A
    Ambio; 2020 Sep; 49(9):1549-1566. PubMed ID: 31776966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Net greenhouse gas emissions from manure management using anaerobic digestion technology in a beef cattle feedlot in Brazil.
    Costa Junior C; Cerri CE; Pires AV; Cerri CC
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Feb; 505():1018-25. PubMed ID: 25461102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of emission estimates for non-CO2 greenhouse gases from livestock and poultry in Korea from 1990 to 2010.
    Paik C; Chung Y; Kim H; Kim YJ
    Anim Sci J; 2016 Apr; 87(4):612-23. PubMed ID: 26419608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An estimation of greenhouse gas emission from livestock in Bangladesh.
    Das NG; Sarker NR; Haque MN
    J Adv Vet Anim Res; 2020 Mar; 7(1):133-140. PubMed ID: 32219119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influencing mechanism of non-CO
    Xiong C; Su W; Li H; Guo Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jun; 29(26):39937-39947. PubMed ID: 35113381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Greenhouse gas emissions from dairy manure management in a Mediterranean environment.
    Owen JJ; Silver WL
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Mar; 27(2):545-559. PubMed ID: 27859918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Green cheese: partial life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and energy intensity of integrated dairy production and bioenergy systems.
    Aguirre-Villegas HA; Passos-Fonseca TH; Reinemann DJ; Armentano LE; Wattiaux MA; Cabrera VE; Norman JM; Larson R
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Mar; 98(3):1571-92. PubMed ID: 25597974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Greenhouse gas emissions from dairy open lot and manure stockpile in northern China: A case study.
    Ding L; Lu Q; Xie L; Liu J; Cao W; Shi Z; Li B; Wang C; Zhang G; Ren S
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Mar; 66(3):267-79. PubMed ID: 26891681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.