These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32063538)

  • 1. A simple 3-point flexural method for measuring fracture toughness of the dental porcelain to zirconia bond and other brittle bimaterial interfaces.
    White SN; Green CC; McMeeking RM
    J Prosthodont Res; 2020 Oct; 64(4):391-396. PubMed ID: 32063538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of slow heating and slow cooling regimens to strengthen porcelain fused to zirconia.
    Tan JP; Sederstrom D; Polansky JR; McLaren EA; White SN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Mar; 107(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 22385692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a high fracture toughness composite ceramic for dental applications.
    Aboushelib MN; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):538-44. PubMed ID: 18761572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the interfacial fracture of porcelain/zirconia and graded zirconia dental structures.
    Chai H; Lee JJ; Mieleszko AJ; Chu SJ; Zhang Y
    Acta Biomater; 2014 Aug; 10(8):3756-61. PubMed ID: 24769152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of Veneering Fabrication Techniques and Gas-Phase Fluorination on Bond Strength between Zirconia and Veneering Ceramics.
    Pharr SW; Teixeira EC; Verrett R; Piascik JR
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Aug; 25(6):478-84. PubMed ID: 26849102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of adding nanoparticles to dental porcelain on the fracture resistance and bond strength to zirconia core.
    Mohammed AJ; Dawood AE; Saeed MA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2022; 33(2):193-197. PubMed ID: 36254959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adhesion determination of dental porcelain to zirconia using the Schwickerath test: strength vs. fracture energy approach.
    Kosyfaki P; Swain MV
    Acta Biomater; 2014 Nov; 10(11):4861-4869. PubMed ID: 25091292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interface toughness of a zirconia-veneer system and the effect of a liner application.
    Wang G; Zhang S; Bian C; Kong H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):576-83. PubMed ID: 24674803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Residual micro-stress distributions in heat-pressed ceramic on zirconia and porcelain-fused to metal systems: Analysis by FIB-DIC ring-core method and correlation with fracture toughness.
    Sebastiani M; Massimi F; Merlati G; Bemporad E
    Dent Mater; 2015 Nov; 31(11):1396-405. PubMed ID: 26365988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of zirconia surface treatment on zirconia/veneer interfacial toughness evaluated by fracture mechanics method.
    Wang G; Zhang S; Bian C; Kong H
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):808-15. PubMed ID: 24747558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Schwickerath adhesion test: A fracture mechanics analysis.
    Schneider GA; Swain MV
    Dent Mater; 2015 Aug; 31(8):986-91. PubMed ID: 26059240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bonding measurement -Strength and fracture mechanics approaches.
    Anunmana C; Wansom W
    Dent Mater J; 2017 Jul; 36(4):497-502. PubMed ID: 28420829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of surface finishes on the flexural strength and fracture toughness of In-Ceram Zirconia.
    Manawi M; Ozcan M; Madina M; Cura C; Valandro LF
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 22414507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modified maximum tangential stress criterion for fracture behavior of zirconia/veneer interfaces.
    Mirsayar MM; Park P
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Jun; 59():236-240. PubMed ID: 26807673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using glass-graded zirconia to increase delamination growth resistance in porcelain/zirconia dental structures.
    Chai H; Mieleszko AJ; Chu SJ; Zhang Y
    Dent Mater; 2018 Jan; 34(1):e8-e14. PubMed ID: 29183670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of zirconia surface treatment on veneering porcelain shear bond strength after cyclic loading.
    Nishigori A; Yoshida T; Bottino MC; Platt JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1392-8. PubMed ID: 25258263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture mechanics analyses of ceramic/veneer interface under mixed-mode loading.
    Wang G; Zhang S; Bian C; Kong H
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Nov; 39():119-28. PubMed ID: 25123435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bond strength of the porcelain repair system to all-ceramic copings and porcelain.
    Lee SJ; Cheong CW; Wright RF; Chang BM
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 23725343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigations into the interface failure of yttria partially stabilised zirconia - porcelain dental prostheses through microscale residual stress and phase quantification.
    Lunt A; Salvati E; Baimpas N; Dolbnya I; Neo TK; Korsunsky AM
    Dent Mater; 2019 Nov; 35(11):1576-1593. PubMed ID: 31522759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Current status of zirconia restoration.
    Miyazaki T; Nakamura T; Matsumura H; Ban S; Kobayashi T
    J Prosthodont Res; 2013 Oct; 57(4):236-61. PubMed ID: 24140561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.