BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32064927)

  • 1. A clinical comparison simulation study using the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in Lithuania.
    Ilgunaite G; Giromini L; Bosi J; Viglione DJ; Zennaro A
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2022; 29(2):155-162. PubMed ID: 32064927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using the inventory of problems - 29 (IOP-29) with the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) in symptom validity assessment: A study with a Portuguese sample of experimental feigners.
    Giromini L; Barbosa F; Coga G; Azeredo A; Viglione DJ; Zennaro A
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2020; 27(6):504-516. PubMed ID: 30773041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and Validation of the False Disorder Score: The Focal Scale of the Inventory of Problems.
    Viglione DJ; Giromini L; Landis P; McCullaugh JM; Pizitz TD; O'Brien S; Wood S; Connell K; Abramsky A
    J Pers Assess; 2019; 101(6):653-661. PubMed ID: 30388903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An Inventory of Problems-29 Sensitivity Study Investigating Feigning of Four Different Symptom Presentations Via Malingering Experimental Paradigm.
    Giromini L; Viglione DJ; Pignolo C; Zennaro A
    J Pers Assess; 2020; 102(4):563-572. PubMed ID: 30714835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Development of the Inventory of Problems-29: A Brief Self-Administered Measure for Discriminating Bona Fide From Feigned Psychiatric and Cognitive Complaints.
    Viglione DJ; Giromini L; Landis P
    J Pers Assess; 2017; 99(5):534-544. PubMed ID: 27767344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Classification accuracy and resistance to coaching of the Spanish version of the Inventory of Problems-29 and the Inventory of Problems-Memory: A simulation study with mTBI patients.
    Puente-López E; Pina D; Rambaud-Quiñones P; Ruiz-Hernández JA; Nieto-Cañaveras MD; Shura RD; Alcazar-Crevillén A; Martinez-Jarreta B
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2024 Apr; 38(3):738-762. PubMed ID: 37615421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Australian study on feigned mTBI using the Inventory of Problems - 29 (IOP-29), its Memory Module (IOP-M), and the Rey Fifteen Item Test (FIT).
    Gegner J; Erdodi LA; Giromini L; Viglione DJ; Bosi J; Brusadelli E
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2022; 29(5):1221-1230. PubMed ID: 33403885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Symptom coaching and symptom validity tests: An analog study using the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology, Self-Report Symptom Inventory, and Inventory of Problems-29.
    Boskovic I; Akca AYE; Giromini L
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2022 Apr; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 35414324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of Feigning of Different Symptom Presentations With the PAI and IOP-29.
    Pignolo C; Giromini L; Ales F; Zennaro A
    Assessment; 2023 Apr; 30(3):565-579. PubMed ID: 34872384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The sensitivity of the IOP-29 and IOP-M to coached feigning of depression and mTBI: An online simulation study in a community sample from the United Kingdom.
    Bosi J; Minassian L; Ales F; Akca AYE; Winters C; Viglione DJ; Zennaro A; Giromini L
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2022 Aug; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 36027614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) study investigating feigned schizophrenia and random responding in a British community sample.
    Winters CL; Giromini L; Crawford TJ; Ales F; Viglione DJ; Warmelink L
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(2):235-254. PubMed ID: 34712094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can the MMPI-2 validity scales detect depression feigned by experts?
    Bagby RM; Nicholson RA; Buis T; Bacchiochi JR
    Assessment; 2000 Mar; 7(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 10668005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the performance of the Beck Depression Inventory-II and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale in Arab adolescents.
    Dardas LA; Shoqirat N; Xu H; Al-Khayat A; Bani Ata S; Shawashreh A; Simmons LA
    Public Health Nurs; 2019 Jul; 36(4):564-574. PubMed ID: 31037762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychometric properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in French clinical and nonclinical adults.
    Morin AJ; Moullec G; Maïano C; Layet L; Just JL; Ninot G
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2011 Oct; 59(5):327-40. PubMed ID: 21925817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Psychometric Properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in Chinese Primary Care Patients: Factor Structure, Construct Validity, Reliability, Sensitivity and Responsiveness.
    Chin WY; Choi EP; Chan KT; Wong CK
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135131. PubMed ID: 26252739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Letter to the Editor: CONVERGENCES AND DIVERGENCES IN THE ICD-11 VS. DSM-5 CLASSIFICATION OF MOOD DISORDERS.
    Cerbo AD
    Turk Psikiyatri Derg; 2021; 32(4):293-295. PubMed ID: 34964106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screening value of the Center for epidemiologic studies - depression scale among people living with HIV/AIDS in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: a validation study.
    Thai TT; Jones MK; Harris LM; Heard RC
    BMC Psychiatry; 2016 May; 16():145. PubMed ID: 27178070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability and validity of the center for epidemiologic studies-depression scale in screening for depression among HIV-infected and -uninfected pregnant women attending antenatal services in northern Uganda: a cross-sectional study.
    Natamba BK; Achan J; Arbach A; Oyok TO; Ghosh S; Mehta S; Stoltzfus RJ; Griffiths JK; Young SL
    BMC Psychiatry; 2014 Nov; 14():303. PubMed ID: 25416286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factor structure and criterion validity across the full scale and ten short forms of the CES-D among Chinese adolescents.
    Yang W; Xiong G; Garrido LE; Zhang JX; Wang MC; Wang C
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Sep; 30(9):1186-1198. PubMed ID: 29658726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The PAI and feigning: A cautionary note on its use in forensic-correctional settings.
    Rogers R; Sewell KW; Cruise KR; Wang EW; Ustad KL
    Assessment; 1998 Dec; 5(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 9835663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.