These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32066203)

  • 1. Repeatability of Goldmann tonometry performed by optometry students on glaucoma patients.
    Trevino RC; Majcher CE; Sponsel WE; Villaflor C; Nozicka J
    Clin Exp Optom; 2020 Nov; 103(6):813-820. PubMed ID: 32066203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Difference in intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and the role of central corneal thickness in affecting glaucoma referrals.
    Kamel K; Dervan E; Falzon K; O'Brien C
    Ir J Med Sci; 2019 Feb; 188(1):321-325. PubMed ID: 29616408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rebound Self-tonometry Acquisition Time and Ease of Use Evaluated by Newly Trained Optometry Students and Optometrists.
    Hyatt R; Furtado NM; Eberle D; Jensen K; Tsang T; Kwan J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Feb; 97(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 32011581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus a transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01"PRA" in glaucoma patients].
    Schlote T; Landenberger H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Feb; 222(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 15719316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Icare ONE rebound versus Goldmann applanation tonometry in children with known or suspected glaucoma.
    Gandhi NG; Prakalapakorn SG; El-Dairi MA; Jones SK; Freedman SF
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Nov; 154(5):843-849.e1. PubMed ID: 22840485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repeatability and reproducibility for intraocular pressure measurement by dynamic contour, ocular response analyzer, and goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Sullivan-Mee M; Gerhardt G; Halverson KD; Qualls C
    J Glaucoma; 2009 Dec; 18(9):666-73. PubMed ID: 20010245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients.
    Vincent SJ; Vincent RA; Shields D; Lee GA
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A clinical evaluation of XPERT NCT (Reichert) for glaucoma screening by optometrists.
    Hollo G; Follmann P; Pap G
    Int Ophthalmol; 1992 Sep; 16(4-5):291-3. PubMed ID: 1428560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Real-world comparison between the Tonopen and Goldmann applanation tonometry in a university glaucoma clinic.
    Blumberg MJ; Varikuti VNV; Weiner A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2021 May; 41(5):1815-1825. PubMed ID: 33651312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diaton tonometry: an assessment of validity and preference against Goldmann tonometry.
    Doherty MD; Carrim ZI; O'Neill DP
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e171-5. PubMed ID: 21718408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-contact tonometry: optometrists' current practice in England and Wales.
    Tuck MW; Crick RP
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1994 Oct; 14(4):347-50. PubMed ID: 7845690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus Perkins hand-held applanation tonometry in overweight patients.
    dos Santos MG; Makk S; Berghold A; Eckhardt M; Haas A
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Dec; 105(12):2260-3. PubMed ID: 9855157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Clinical evaluation of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer].
    Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Detry MB; Ledoux A; Pourjavan S
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2007 Mar; 30(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 17417152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical comparison of two intraocular pressure measurement methods: SmartLens dynamic observing tonography versus Goldmann.
    Troost R; Vogel A; Beck S; Schwenn O; Grus F; Pfeiffer N
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2001 Dec; 239(12):889-92. PubMed ID: 11820692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the corrected intraocular pressure by tonopachy with that of Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal and glaucomatous patients.
    Velis G; Kavitha S; Zebardast N; Sengupta S; Venkatesh R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 68(4):620-626. PubMed ID: 32174582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does Goldmann applanation tonometry performed by community optometrists reduce referrals? A pilot study.
    Sheehan W; Adams D; Wells C; Booth A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2011 Feb; 95(2):295. PubMed ID: 21041456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the Tono-Pen and Goldmann tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma.
    Horowitz GS; Byles J; Lee J; D'Este C
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 32(6):584-9. PubMed ID: 15575828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of repeated applanation tonometry on the accuracy of intraocular pressure measurements.
    Gaton DD; Ehrenberg M; Lusky M; Wussuki-Lior O; Dotan G; Weinberger D; Snir M
    Curr Eye Res; 2010 Jun; 35(6):475-9. PubMed ID: 20465440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Clinical Interpretation of Changes in Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: A Review.
    Pearce JG; Maddess T
    J Glaucoma; 2019 Apr; 28(4):302-306. PubMed ID: 30946710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.