133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32066248)
1. Evaluation of Low-Dose Multidetector Computed Tomography Whole Gastroenterography With Oral Administration of Contrast Agents.
Guo Y; Wang QJ; Shi LJ; Hu YY; Li WP
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2021 Aug; 72(3):410-417. PubMed ID: 32066248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gastrointestinal tract wall visualization and distention during abdominal and pelvic multidetector CT with a neutral barium sulphate suspension: comparison with positive barium sulphate suspension and with water.
Oliva MR; Erturk SM; Ichikawa T; Rocha T; Ros PR; Silverman SG; Mortele KJ
JBR-BTR; 2012; 95(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 23019990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Water as a contrast medium: a re-evaluation using the multidetector-row computed tomography.
Makarawo TP; Negussie E; Malde S; Tilak J; Gayagoy J; Watson J; Francis F; Lincoln D; Jacobs MJ
Am Surg; 2013 Jul; 79(7):728-33. PubMed ID: 23816008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enteric Distribution of Oral Contrast in Emergency Department Patients Undergoing Abdominal-Pelvic Computed Tomography.
Hanna TN; Streicher DA; Razavi SA; Khosa F; Johnson JO; Applegate KE
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2016 Aug; 67(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 26899379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of 2 different protocols for ingestion of low-attenuating oral contrast agent for multidetector computed tomography of the abdomen.
Meindl TM; Hagl E; Reiser MF; Mueller-Lisse UG
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(2):218-22. PubMed ID: 17414757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of bowel distension and mural visualisation using neutral oral contrast agents for multidetector-row computed tomography.
Lim BK; Bux SI; Rahmat K; Lam SY; Liew YW
Singapore Med J; 2012 Nov; 53(11):732-6. PubMed ID: 23192500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The combination of a reduction in contrast agent dose with low tube voltage and an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm in CT enterography: Effects on image quality and radiation dose.
Feng C; Zhu D; Zou X; Li A; Hu X; Li Z; Hu D
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Mar; 97(12):e0151. PubMed ID: 29561422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the effect of positive and negative oral contrast agents on (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan.
Sun XG; Huang G; Liu JJ; Wan LR
Hell J Nucl Med; 2009; 12(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 19675862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Coronary CT angiography with 80 kV tube voltage and low iodine concentration contrast agent in patients with low body weight.
Andreini D; Mushtaq S; Conte E; Segurini C; Guglielmo M; Petullà M; Volpato V; Annoni A; Baggiano A; Formenti A; Bartorelli AL; Fiorentini C; Pepi M
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 27357327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Depiction of normal gastrointestinal anatomy with MDCT: comparison of low- and high-attenuation oral contrast media.
Erturk SM; Mortelé KJ; Oliva MR; Ichikawa T; Silverman SG; Cantisani V; Pagliara E; Ros PR
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Apr; 66(1):84-7. PubMed ID: 17604930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of water-enema multidetector computed tomography (WE-MDCT) in colon cancer staging: a prospective study.
Sibileau E; Ridereau-Zins C; Vanel D; Pavageau AH; Bertrais S; Metivier-Cesbron E; Venara A; Aubé C
Abdom Imaging; 2014 Oct; 39(5):941-8. PubMed ID: 24811763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of neutral oral contrast agents for assessment of the small bowel at abdominal staging CT.
Kaireit TF; Huisinga C; Peperhove M; Wacker F; Ringe KI
PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0225160. PubMed ID: 31725763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of Multidetector Computed Tomography and Negative Versus Positive Enteric Contrast for Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.
Morani AC; Gupta S; Elsayes KM; Mubarak AI; Khalaf AM; Bhosale PR; Sun J; Jensen CT; Kundra V
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2022 May-Jun 01; 46(3):333-343. PubMed ID: 35575649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective randomized trial of iohexol 350 versus meglumine sodium diatrizoate as an oral contrast agent for abdominopelvic computed tomography.
Peterson CM; Lin M; Pilgram T; Heiken JP
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 21412090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel food-based foam as oral contrast agent with negative Hounsfield units for demarcation of small bowel loops on abdominal CT: tolerability and bowel distension in 25 volunteers.
Leander P; Adnerhill I; Böök O; Casal-Dujat L; Stathis G; Fork T
Acta Radiol; 2021 Dec; 62(12):1559-1566. PubMed ID: 33251810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Use of multidetector computed tomography for locating the site of gastrointestinal tract perforations].
Cadenas Rodríguez L; Martí de Gracia M; Saturio Galán N; Pérez Dueñas V; Salvatierra Arrieta L; Garzón Moll G
Cir Esp; 2013 May; 91(5):316-23. PubMed ID: 23036254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimized protocol of multiple post-processing techniques improves diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography in assessment of small bowel obstruction compared with conventional axial and coronal reformations.
Kuang LQ; Tang W; Li R; Cheng C; Tang SY; Wang Y
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Mar; 25(9):1100-1115. PubMed ID: 30862998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of neutral oral contrast versus positive oral contrast medium in abdominal multidetector CT.
Berther R; Patak MA; Eckhardt B; Erturk SM; Zollikofer CL
Eur Radiol; 2008 Sep; 18(9):1902-9. PubMed ID: 18414870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Noninvasive multidetector computed tomography enterography in patients with small-bowel Crohn's disease: is a 40-second delay better than 70 seconds?
Vandenbroucke F; Mortelé KJ; Tatli S; Pelsser V; Erturk SM; De Mey J; Silverman SG
Acta Radiol; 2007 Dec; 48(10):1052-60. PubMed ID: 17963078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gastrointestinal tract perforation: evaluation of MDCT according to perforation site and elapsed time.
Kim HC; Yang DM; Kim SW; Park SJ
Eur Radiol; 2014 Jun; 24(6):1386-93. PubMed ID: 24623365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
