These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32067201)

  • 21. Recent trends for practical rehabilitation robotics, current challenges and the future.
    Yakub F; Md Khudzari AZ; Mori Y
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2014 Mar; 37(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 24126254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The potential power of robotics for upper extremity stroke rehabilitation.
    Dukelow SP
    Int J Stroke; 2017 Jan; 12(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 27306363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Rehabilitation robots for the treatment of sensorimotor deficits: a neurophysiological perspective.
    Gassert R; Dietz V
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Jun; 15(1):46. PubMed ID: 29866106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robotics in Lower-Limb Rehabilitation after Stroke.
    Zhang X; Yue Z; Wang J
    Behav Neurol; 2017; 2017():3731802. PubMed ID: 28659660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effectiveness of robotic assisted rehabilitation for mobility and functional ability in adult stroke patients: a systematic review.
    Lo K; Stephenson M; Lockwood C
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2017 Dec; 15(12):3049-3091. PubMed ID: 29219877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Predicting Functional Recovery in Chronic Stroke Rehabilitation Using Event-Related Desynchronization-Synchronization during Robot-Assisted Movement.
    Caimmi M; Visani E; Digiacomo F; Scano A; Chiavenna A; Gramigna C; Molinari Tosatti L; Franceschetti S; Molteni F; Panzica F
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():7051340. PubMed ID: 27057546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nonpharmacological rehabilitation interventions for motor and cognitive outcomes following pediatric stroke: a systematic review.
    Mirkowski M; McIntyre A; Faltynek P; Sequeira N; Cassidy C; Teasell R
    Eur J Pediatr; 2019 Apr; 178(4):433-454. PubMed ID: 30810821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robot-assisted ankle rehabilitation: a review.
    Alvarez-Perez MG; Garcia-Murillo MA; Cervantes-Sánchez JJ
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 May; 15(4):394-408. PubMed ID: 30856032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Socially assistive robotics for post-stroke rehabilitation.
    Matarić MJ; Eriksson J; Feil-Seifer DJ; Winstein CJ
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 4():5. PubMed ID: 17309795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Upper limb robotics applied to neurorehabilitation: An overview of clinical practice.
    Duret C; Mazzoleni S
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2017; 41(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 28505985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Review on design and control aspects of ankle rehabilitation robots.
    Jamwal PK; Hussain S; Xie SQ
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2015 Mar; 10(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 24320195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The immediate effects of robot-assistance on energy consumption and cardiorespiratory load during walking compared to walking without robot-assistance: a systematic review.
    Lefeber N; Swinnen E; Kerckhofs E
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Oct; 12(7):657-671. PubMed ID: 27762641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A novel robot-assisted training approach for improving gait symmetry after stroke.
    Zadravec M; Olensek A; Rudolf M; Bizovicar N; Goljar N; Matjacic Z
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():222-227. PubMed ID: 28813822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effectiveness of robo-assisted lower limb rehabilitation for spastic patients: A systematic review.
    Shakti D; Mathew L; Kumar N; Kataria C
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2018 Oct; 117():403-415. PubMed ID: 29960851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Robot applications for autism: a comprehensive review.
    Saleh MA; Hanapiah FA; Hashim H
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Aug; 16(6):580-602. PubMed ID: 32706602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Lower limb rehabilitation robotics: The current understanding and technology.
    Bhardwaj S; Khan AA; Muzammil M
    Work; 2021; 69(3):775-793. PubMed ID: 34180443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interaction force and motion estimators facilitating impedance control of the upper limb rehabilitation robot.
    Mancisidor A; Zubizarreta A; Cabanes I; Bengoa P; Jung JH
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():561-566. PubMed ID: 28813879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Robot-assisted upper extremity rehabilitation for cervical spinal cord injuries: a systematic scoping review.
    Singh H; Unger J; Zariffa J; Pakosh M; Jaglal S; Craven BC; Musselman KE
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Oct; 13(7):704-715. PubMed ID: 29334467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Upper limb robot-assisted therapy in subacute and chronic stroke patients using an innovative end-effector haptic device: A pilot study.
    Mazzoleni S; Battini E; Crecchi R; Dario P; Posteraro F
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2018; 42(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 29400670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Self-powered robots to reduce motor slacking during upper-extremity rehabilitation: a proof of concept study.
    Washabaugh EP; Treadway E; Gillespie RB; Remy CD; Krishnan C
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2018; 36(6):693-708. PubMed ID: 30400120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.