207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32067845)
1. Prostatic-specific antigen density behavior according to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging result.
Morote J; Celma A; Diaz F; Regis L; Roche S; Mast R; Semidey ME; de Torres IM; Planas J; Trilla E
Urol Oncol; 2020 May; 38(5):410-417. PubMed ID: 32067845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of prostate-specific antigen density on positive and negative predictive values of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect Gleason score 7-10 prostate cancer in a repeat biopsy setting.
Hansen NL; Barrett T; Koo B; Doble A; Gnanapragasam V; Warren A; Kastner C; Bratt O
BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):724-730. PubMed ID: 27488931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI.
Han C; Liu S; Qin XB; Ma S; Zhu LN; Wang XY
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Apr; 101(4):235-244. PubMed ID: 32063483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of prostate-specific antigen density and negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in excluding prostate cancer for biopsy-naïve men: clinical outcomes from a high-volume center in China.
Zhang CC; Tu X; Lin TH; Cai DM; Yang L; Nie L; Qiu S; Liu ZH; Jin K; Li JK; Xiong XY; Yang L; Wei Q
Asian J Androl; 2022; 24(6):615-619. PubMed ID: 35532555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Avoiding Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Biopsies: Negative and Positive Predictive Value of MRI According to Prostate-specific Antigen Density, 4Kscore and Risk Calculators.
Falagario UG; Martini A; Wajswol E; Treacy PJ; Ratnani P; Jambor I; Anastos H; Lewis S; Haines K; Cormio L; Carrieri G; Rastinehad AR; Wiklund P; Tewari A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 3(5):700-704. PubMed ID: 31548130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of Prostate Specific Antigen Density Combined with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improves Triage for Prostate Biopsy.
Záleský M; Stejskal J; Adamcova V; Hrbáček J; Minarik I; Pavlicko A; Votrubova J; Babjuk M; Zachoval R
Urol Int; 2019; 103(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 31067560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 31200846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Follow-up of Patients Included in Active Surveillance Protocol. Can PSA Density Discriminate Patients at Different Risk of Reclassification?
Roscigno M; Stabile A; Lughezzani G; Pepe P; Galosi AB; Naselli A; Naspro R; Nicolai M; La Croce G; Aljoulani M; Perugini G; Guazzoni G; Montorsi F; Balzarini L; Sironi S; Da Pozzo LF
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2020 Dec; 18(6):e698-e704. PubMed ID: 32493676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combining clinical parameters and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to stratify biopsy-naïve men for an optimum diagnostic strategy with prostate-specific antigen 4 ng ml
Zhang CC; Tu X; Lin TH; Cai DM; Yang L; Qiu S; Liu ZH; Yang L; Wei Q
Asian J Androl; 2023; 25(4):492-498. PubMed ID: 36571328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of 3-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy for improved risk stratification in patients considered for active surveillance.
Pessoa RR; Viana PC; Mattedi RL; Guglielmetti GB; Cordeiro MD; Coelho RF; Nahas WC; Srougi M
BJU Int; 2017 Apr; 119(4):535-542. PubMed ID: 27500389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The "Is mpMRI Enough" or IMRIE Study: A Multicentre Evaluation of Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared with Biopsy.
Stonier T; Simson N; Shah T; Lobo N; Amer T; Lee SM; Bass E; Chau E; Grey A; McCartan N; Acher P; Ahmad I; Arumainayagam N; Brown D; Chapman A; Elf D; Hartington T; Ibrahim I; Leung H; Liyanage S; Lovegrove C; Malthouse T; Mateen B; Mistry K; Morrison I; Nalagatla S; Persad R; Pope A; Sokhi H; Syed H; Tadtayev S; Tharmaratnam M; Qteishat A; Miah S; Emberton M; Moore C; Walton T; Eddy B; Ahmed HU
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):1027-1034. PubMed ID: 33046412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.
Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of mpMRI and PSA density in patients with an initial negative prostatic biopsy.
Kotb AF; Spaner S; Crump T; Hyndman ME
World J Urol; 2018 Dec; 36(12):2021-2025. PubMed ID: 29808301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic Accuracy of Single-plane Biparametric and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Russo F; Mazzetti S; Regge D; Ambrosini I; Giannini V; Manfredi M; De Luca S; Bollito E; Porpiglia F
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):855-862. PubMed ID: 33893066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of different thresholds of PSA density for risk stratification of PI-RADSv2.1 categories on prostate MRI.
Girometti R; Giannarini G; Panebianco V; Maresca S; Cereser L; De Martino M; Pizzolitto S; Pecoraro M; Ficarra V; Zuiani C; Valotto C
Br J Radiol; 2022 Mar; 95(1131):20210886. PubMed ID: 34762506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What Type of Prostate Cancer Is Systematically Overlooked by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? An Analysis from the PROMIS Cohort.
Norris JM; Carmona Echeverria LM; Bott SRJ; Brown LC; Burns-Cox N; Dudderidge T; El-Shater Bosaily A; Frangou E; Freeman A; Ghei M; Henderson A; Hindley RG; Kaplan RS; Kirkham A; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Persad R; Punwani S; Rosario DJ; Shergill IS; Stavrinides V; Winkler M; Whitaker HC; Ahmed HU; Emberton M
Eur Urol; 2020 Aug; 78(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 32370911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nonsuspicious prebiopsy multiparametric MRI: is prostate biopsy still necessary?
Anastay V; Gondran-Tellier B; McManus R; Delonca R; Akiki A; Gaillet S; Delaporte V; Andre M; Daniel L; Karsenty G; Lechevallier E; Boissier R; Baboudjian M
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Dec; 45(12):4160-4165. PubMed ID: 32902661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of risk factors for determining the need for prostate biopsy in patients with negative MRI.
Liang L; Qi F; Cheng Y; Zhang L; Cao D; Cheng G; Hua L
Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):6048. PubMed ID: 33723287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
