217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32068169)
1. An Independent Interobserver Reliability and Intraobserver Reproducibility Evaluation of Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score and Kostuik Classification Systems for Spinal Tumor.
Xu C; Yin M; Sun Z; Yan Y; Mo W; Yan W
World Neurosurg; 2020 May; 137():e564-e569. PubMed ID: 32068169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spine Instability Neoplastic Score: agreement across different medical and surgical specialties.
Arana E; Kovacs FM; Royuela A; Asenjo B; Pérez-Ramírez Ú; Zamora J;
Spine J; 2016 May; 16(5):591-9. PubMed ID: 26471708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Spine Instability Neoplastic Score: an independent reliability and reproducibility analysis.
Campos M; Urrutia J; Zamora T; Román J; Canessa V; Borghero Y; Palma A; Molina M
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1466-9. PubMed ID: 24275615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of the spinal instability neoplastic scale among radiologists: an assessment of instability secondary to spinal metastases.
Fisher CG; Versteeg AL; Schouten R; Boriani S; Varga PP; Rhines LD; Heran MK; Kawahara N; Fourney D; Reynolds JJ; Fehlings MG; Gokaslan ZL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):869-74. PubMed ID: 25247954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An independent evaluation on the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of Toyama classification system for cervical dumbbell tumors.
Yin M; Huang Q; Sun Z; Gao X; Chen G; He S; Xia Y; Ma J; Mo W; Xiao J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Mar; 96(10):e6183. PubMed ID: 28272207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intra- and interobserver reliability of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score system for instability in spine metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Pennington Z; Ahmed AK; Cottrill E; Westbroek EM; Goodwin ML; Sciubba DM
Ann Transl Med; 2019 May; 7(10):218. PubMed ID: 31297383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An assessment of the reliability of the Enneking and Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini classifications for staging of primary spinal tumors by the Spine Oncology Study Group.
Chan P; Boriani S; Fourney DR; Biagini R; Dekutoski MB; Fehlings MG; Ryken TC; Gokaslan ZL; Vrionis FD; Harrop JS; Schmidt MH; Vialle LR; Gerszten PC; Rhines LD; Ondra SL; Pratt SR; Fisher CG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(4):384-91. PubMed ID: 19214098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simplified Chinese Version of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score in Evaluating Patients with Metastatic Spinal Tumor: A Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation.
Chen J; Wu C; Hong H; Wang X; Zhang J; Xue P; Jiang J; Wang D; Cui Z
Orthop Surg; 2022 Aug; 14(8):1630-1637. PubMed ID: 35715948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) among radiation oncologists: an assessment of instability secondary to spinal metastases.
Fisher CG; Schouten R; Versteeg AL; Boriani S; Varga PP; Rhines LD; Kawahara N; Fourney D; Weir L; Reynolds JJ; Sahgal A; Fehlings MG; Gokaslan ZL
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Mar; 9():69. PubMed ID: 24594004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability and Agreement of Different Spine Fracture Classification Systems: An Independent Intraobserver and Interobserver Study.
Pishnamaz M; Balosu S; Curfs I; Uhing D; Laubach M; Herren C; Weber C; Hildebrand F; Willems P; Kobbe P
World Neurosurg; 2018 Jul; 115():e695-e702. PubMed ID: 29709750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of two classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
Lauder AJ; Inda DJ; Bott AM; Clare MP; Fitzgibbons TC; Mormino MA
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Apr; 27(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 16624214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spinal instability neoplastic score: an analysis of reliability and validity from the spine oncology study group.
Fourney DR; Frangou EM; Ryken TC; Dipaola CP; Shaffrey CI; Berven SH; Bilsky MH; Harrop JS; Fehlings MG; Boriani S; Chou D; Schmidt MH; Polly DW; Biagini R; Burch S; Dekutoski MB; Ganju A; Gerszten PC; Gokaslan ZL; Groff MW; Liebsch NJ; Mendel E; Okuno SH; Patel S; Rhines LD; Rose PS; Sciubba DM; Sundaresan N; Tomita K; Varga PP; Vialle LR; Vrionis FD; Yamada Y; Fisher CG
J Clin Oncol; 2011 Aug; 29(22):3072-7. PubMed ID: 21709187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS): Reliability Among Spine Fellows and Resident Physicians in Orthopedic Surgery and Neurosurgery.
Fox S; Spiess M; Hnenny L; Fourney DR
Global Spine J; 2017 Dec; 7(8):744-748. PubMed ID: 29238637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An independent interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility evaluation of the new AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System.
Urrutia J; Zamora T; Yurac R; Campos M; Palma J; Mobarec S; Prada C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(1):E54-8. PubMed ID: 25341990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interobserver agreement for the spine instability neoplastic score varies according to the experience of the evaluator.
Teixeira WG; Coutinho PR; Marchese LD; Narazaki DK; Cristante AF; Teixeira MJ; Barros Filho TE; Camargo OP
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2013; 68(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 23525318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability and reproducibility analysis of the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system by Chinese spinal surgeons.
Cheng J; Liu P; Sun D; Qin T; Ma Z; Liu J
Eur Spine J; 2017 May; 26(5):1477-1482. PubMed ID: 27807778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of the classification and treatment of dislocations of the acromioclavicular joint.
Cho CH; Hwang I; Seo JS; Choi CH; Ko SH; Park HB; Dan J
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2014 May; 23(5):665-70. PubMed ID: 24745314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A retrospective evaluation of reliability and reproducibility of Arbeitsgemeinschaftfür Osteosynthesefragen classification and Fernandez classification for distal radius fracture.
Yinjie Y; Gen W; Hongbo W; Chongqing X; Fan Z; Yanqi F; Xuequn W; Wen M
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jan; 99(2):e18508. PubMed ID: 31914022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of reliability between the Lenke and King classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using radiographs that were not premeasured.
Richards BS; Sucato DJ; Konigsberg DE; Ouellet JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(11):1148-56; discussion 1156-7. PubMed ID: 12782983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability in the load sharing classification of the assessment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.
Dai LY; Jin WJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Feb; 30(3):354-8. PubMed ID: 15682019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
