334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32069084)
1. Retrospective Cohort Study of 1947 Thyroid Nodules: A Comparison of the 2017 American College of Radiology TI-RADS and the 2015 American Thyroid Association Classifications.
Pandya A; Caoili EM; Jawad-Makki F; Wasnik AP; Shankar PR; Bude R; Haymart MR; Davenport MS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Apr; 214(4):900-906. PubMed ID: 32069084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reduction in Thyroid Nodule Biopsies and Improved Accuracy with American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System.
Hoang JK; Middleton WD; Farjat AE; Langer JE; Reading CC; Teefey SA; Abinanti N; Boschini FJ; Bronner AJ; Dahiya N; Hertzberg BS; Newman JR; Scanga D; Vogler RC; Tessler FN
Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):185-193. PubMed ID: 29498593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Thyroid Risk Categorization Systems and Fine-Needle Aspiration Recommendations in a Multi-Institutional Thyroid Ultrasound Registry.
Hoang JK; Middleton WD; Langer JE; Schmidt K; Gillis LB; Nair SS; Watts JA; Snyder RW; Khot R; Rawal U; Tessler FN
J Am Coll Radiol; 2021 Dec; 18(12):1605-1613. PubMed ID: 34419476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Performance Characteristics of American College of Radiology TI-RADS, Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology TIRADS, and American Thyroid Association Guidelines.
Middleton WD; Teefey SA; Reading CC; Langer JE; Beland MD; Szabunio MM; Desser TS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 May; 210(5):1148-1154. PubMed ID: 29629797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of the American Thyroid Association Guidelines and American College of Radiology TI-RADS.
Liu J; Guo Y; Xiao J; Chen L; Liang Z
Endocr Pract; 2021 Jul; 27(7):661-667. PubMed ID: 34250908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic Accuracy of Five Different Classification Systems for Thyroid Nodules: A Prospective, Comparative Study.
Orhan Soylemez UP; Gunduz N
J Ultrasound Med; 2022 May; 41(5):1125-1136. PubMed ID: 34370333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison among TIRADS (ACR TI-RADS and KWAK- TI-RADS) and 2015 ATA Guidelines in the diagnostic efficiency of thyroid nodules.
Gao L; Xi X; Jiang Y; Yang X; Wang Y; Zhu S; Lai X; Zhang X; Zhao R; Zhang B
Endocrine; 2019 Apr; 64(1):90-96. PubMed ID: 30659427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fine needle aspiration biopsy indications for thyroid nodules: compare a point-based risk stratification system with a pattern-based risk stratification system.
Ruan JL; Yang HY; Liu RB; Liang M; Han P; Xu XL; Luo BM
Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4871-4878. PubMed ID: 30715590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of the thyroid imaging, reporting, and data system (TI-RADS) scoring system for the evaluation of subcentimeter thyroid nodules.
Weiss VL; Andreotti RF; Ely KA
Cancer Cytopathol; 2018 Aug; 126(8):518-524. PubMed ID: 29733503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of TI-RADS and ATA classifications for predicting malignancy of thyroid nodules.
Şahin M; Oguz A; Tuzun D; Akkus G; Törün GI; Bahar AY; Şahin H; Gül K
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2021 Nov; 30(11):1133-1139. PubMed ID: 34510845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differences between ATA, AACE/ACE/AME and ACR TI-RADS ultrasound classifications performance in identifying cytological high-risk thyroid nodules.
Lauria Pantano A; Maddaloni E; Briganti SI; Beretta Anguissola G; Perrella E; Taffon C; Palermo A; Pozzilli P; Manfrini S; Crescenzi A
Eur J Endocrinol; 2018 Jun; 178(6):595-603. PubMed ID: 29626008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A DIRECT COMPARISON OF THE ATA AND TI-RADS ULTRASOUND SCORING SYSTEMS.
Ahmadi S; Oyekunle T; Jiang X'; Scheri R; Perkins J; Stang M; Roman S; Sosa JA
Endocr Pract; 2019 May; 25(5):413-422. PubMed ID: 30720343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison and preliminary discussion of the reasons for the differences in diagnostic performance and unnecessary FNA biopsies between the ACR TIRADS and 2015 ATA guidelines.
Wu XL; Du JR; Wang H; Jin CX; Sui GQ; Yang DY; Lin YQ; Luo Q; Fu P; Li HQ; Teng DK
Endocrine; 2019 Jul; 65(1):121-131. PubMed ID: 30830584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of 5 Thyroid Ultrasound Stratification Systems for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Nodules and to Avoid Biopsy Using Histology as Reference Standard.
Kuru B; Kefeli M; Danaci M
Endocr Pract; 2021 Nov; 27(11):1093-1099. PubMed ID: 33930581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS), and ultrasonographic classification of the American Thyroid Association (ATA) in differentiating benign from malignant thyroid nodules.
Macedo BM; Izquierdo RF; Golbert L; Meyer ELS
Arch Endocrinol Metab; 2018; 62(2):131-138. PubMed ID: 29641731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modified American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System and Modified Artificial Intelligence Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System for Thyroid Nodules: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Li X; Peng C; Liu Y; Hu Y; Yang L; Yu Y; Zeng H; Huang W; Li Q; Tao N; Cao L; Zhou J
Thyroid; 2024 Jan; 34(1):88-100. PubMed ID: 37950720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System for Thyroid Nodule Malignancy Risk Stratification in a Pediatric Population.
Lim-Dunham JE; Toslak IE; Reiter MP; Martin B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Jan; 212(1):188-194. PubMed ID: 30403525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. USING THE ATA AND ACR TI-RADS SONOGRAPHIC CLASSIFICATIONS AS ADJUNCTIVE PREDICTORS OF MALIGNANCY FOR INDETERMINATE THYROID NODULES.
Ahmadi S; Herbst R; Oyekunle T; Jiang X'; Strickland K; Roman S; Sosa JA
Endocr Pract; 2019 Sep; 25(9):908-917. PubMed ID: 31170369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Diagnostic Efficacy of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Report and Data System (TI-RADS) and the American Thyroid Association (ATA) Risk Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules.
Chen F; Sun Y; Chen G; Luo Y; Xue G; Luo K; Ma H; Yao J; Zhu Z; Li G; Li Q
Comput Math Methods Med; 2022; 2022():9995962. PubMed ID: 35075371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasonography scoring systems can rule out malignancy in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules.
Grani G; Lamartina L; Ascoli V; Bosco D; Nardi F; D'Ambrosio F; Rubini A; Giacomelli L; Biffoni M; Filetti S; Durante C; Cantisani V
Endocrine; 2017 Aug; 57(2):256-261. PubMed ID: 27804016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
