These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32069269)

  • 1. Recognition of Accented Speech by Cochlear-Implant Listeners: Benefit of Audiovisual Cues.
    Waddington E; Jaekel BN; Tinnemore AR; Gordon-Salant S; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1236-1250. PubMed ID: 32069269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Audiovisual Speech Recognition With a Cochlear Implant and Increased Perceptual and Cognitive Demands.
    Tinnemore AR; Gordon-Salant S; Goupell MJ
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520960601. PubMed ID: 33054620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in visually and auditory attended audiovisual speech processing in cochlear implant users: A longitudinal ERP study.
    Weglage A; Layer N; Meister H; Müller V; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Sandmann P
    Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 447():109023. PubMed ID: 38733710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Weighting of Prosodic and Lexical-Semantic Cues for Emotion Identification in Spectrally Degraded Speech and With Cochlear Implants.
    Richter ME; Chatterjee M
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1727-1740. PubMed ID: 34294630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection and Recognition of Asynchronous Auditory/Visual Speech: Effects of Age, Hearing Loss, and Talker Accent.
    Gordon-Salant S; Schwartz MS; Oppler KA; Yeni-Komshian GH
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():772867. PubMed ID: 35153900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of Listener Age and Native Language Experience on Recognition of Accented and Unaccented English Words.
    Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Bieber RE; Jara Ureta DA; Freund MS; Fitzgibbons PJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4S):1131-1143. PubMed ID: 31026190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of listener age and native language on perception of accented and unaccented sentences.
    Bieber RE; Yeni-Komshian GH; Freund MS; Fitzgibbons PJ; Gordon-Salant S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Dec; 144(6):3191. PubMed ID: 30599683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validating a Method to Assess Lipreading, Audiovisual Gain, and Integration During Speech Reception With Cochlear-Implanted and Normal-Hearing Subjects Using a Talking Head.
    Schreitmüller S; Frenken M; Bentz L; Ortmann M; Walger M; Meister H
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):503-516. PubMed ID: 29068860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using prosody to infer discourse prominence in cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Huang YT; Newman RS; Catalano A; Goupell MJ
    Cognition; 2017 Sep; 166():184-200. PubMed ID: 28578222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perception of contrastive bi-syllabic lexical stress in unaccented and accented words by younger and older listeners.
    Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Pickett EJ; Fitzgibbons PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):1132-48. PubMed ID: 27036250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binaural Optimization of Cochlear Implants: Discarding Frequency Content Without Sacrificing Head-Shadow Benefit.
    Sheffield SW; Goupell MJ; Spencer NJ; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):576-590. PubMed ID: 31436754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The timecourse of multisensory speech processing in unilaterally stimulated cochlear implant users revealed by ERPs.
    Layer N; Weglage A; Müller V; Meister H; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Murray MM; Sandmann P
    Neuroimage Clin; 2022; 34():102982. PubMed ID: 35303598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Audiovisual Processing Skills Before Cochlear Implantation Predict Postoperative Speech Recognition in Adults.
    Moberly AC; Pisoni DB; Tamati TN
    Ear Hear; 2024 May-Jun 01; 45(3):617-625. PubMed ID: 38143302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Music Is More Enjoyable With Two Ears, Even If One of Them Receives a Degraded Signal Provided By a Cochlear Implant.
    Landsberger DM; Vermeire K; Stupak N; Lavender A; Neukam J; Van de Heyning P; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):476-490. PubMed ID: 31469701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spectral-Temporal Trade-Off in Vocoded Sentence Recognition: Effects of Age, Hearing Thresholds, and Working Memory.
    Shader MJ; Yancey CM; Gordon-Salant S; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1226-1235. PubMed ID: 32032222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gender identification in younger and older adults: use of spectral and temporal cues in noise-vocoded speech.
    Schvartz KC; Chatterjee M
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):411-20. PubMed ID: 22237163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy and cue use in word segmentation for cochlear-implant listeners and normal-hearing listeners presented vocoded speech.
    Heffner CC; Jaekel BN; Newman RS; Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Oct; 150(4):2936. PubMed ID: 34717484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Top-Down Processes in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Hearing: The Effect of Linguistic Context on Bimodal Benefit for Temporally Interrupted Speech.
    Oh SH; Donaldson GS; Kong YY
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 27007220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception.
    Warnecke M; Peng ZE; Litovsky RY
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0238125. PubMed ID: 32822439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.