BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32069349)

  • 1. A Hybrid Dental Model Concept Utilizing Fused Deposition Modeling and Digital Light Processing 3D Printing.
    Lee D; Lee SY; Kim H; Park C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(2):229-231. PubMed ID: 32069349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Precision and trueness of dental models manufactured with different 3-dimensional printing techniques.
    Kim SY; Shin YS; Jung HD; Hwang CJ; Baik HS; Cha JY
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jan; 153(1):144-153. PubMed ID: 29287640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative Analysis of Fused Deposition Modeling and Digital Light Processing Techniques for Dimensional Accuracy in Clear Aligner Manufacturing.
    Grzebieluch W; Grajzer M; Mikulewicz M
    Med Sci Monit; 2023 Aug; 29():e940922. PubMed ID: 37533235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Fabrication and accuracy research on 3D printing dental model based on cone beam computed tomography digital modeling].
    Zhang HR; Yin LF; Liu YL; Yan LY; Wang N; Liu G; An XL; Liu B
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 36(2):156-161. PubMed ID: 29779276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating and Comparing Flexure Strength of Dental Models Printed Using Fused Deposition Modelling, Digital Light Processing, and Stereolithography Apparatus Printers.
    Atwal N; Bhatnagar D
    Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e54312. PubMed ID: 38496206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the three-dimensional printing technique and printing layer thickness on model accuracy.
    Zhang ZC; Li PL; Chu FT; Shen G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2019 Jul; 80(4):194-204. PubMed ID: 31172199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dimensional accuracy and surface characteristics of 3D-printed dental casts.
    Park JM; Jeon J; Koak JY; Kim SK; Heo SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):427-437. PubMed ID: 32958301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the fused deposition modeling and the digital light processing techniques in terms of dimensional accuracy of printing dental models used for the fabrication of clear aligners.
    Jaber ST; Hajeer MY; Khattab TZ; Mahaini L
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2021 Aug; 7(4):591-600. PubMed ID: 33258297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models reconstructed from digital intraoral impressions.
    Brown GB; Currier GF; Kadioglu O; Kierl JP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Nov; 154(5):733-739. PubMed ID: 30384944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Presurgical Dental Models Manufactured with Two Different Three-Dimensional Printing Techniques.
    Metlerski M; Grocholewicz K; Jaroń A; Lipski M; Trybek G
    J Healthc Eng; 2020; 2020():8893338. PubMed ID: 33062231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clear guidance to select the most accurate technologies for 3D printing dental models - A network meta-analysis
    Németh A; Vitai V; Czumbel ML; Szabó B; Varga G; Kerémi B; Hegyi P; Hermann P; Borbély J
    J Dent; 2023 Jul; 134():104532. PubMed ID: 37120090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis.
    Emir F; Ayyildiz S
    J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Aug; 65(3):365-370. PubMed ID: 33177305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of digital light processing printing of 3-dimensional dental models.
    Sherman SL; Kadioglu O; Currier GF; Kierl JP; Li J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Mar; 157(3):422-428. PubMed ID: 32115120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Two Inexpensive Rapid Prototyping Methods for Manufacturing Filament Target Ultrasound Phantoms.
    Füzesi K; Gyöngy M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):712-720. PubMed ID: 28034541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From 3D imaging to 3D printing in dentistry - a practical guide.
    Moser N; Santander P; Quast A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(4):345-356. PubMed ID: 30539177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dimensional Accuracy Evaluation of Temporary Dental Restorations with Different 3D Printing Systems.
    Moon W; Kim S; Lim BS; Park YS; Kim RJ; Chung SH
    Materials (Basel); 2021 Mar; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 33803596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterisation of fused deposition modeling 3D printers for pharmaceutical and medical applications.
    Feuerbach T; Kock S; Thommes M
    Pharm Dev Technol; 2018 Dec; 23(10):1136-1145. PubMed ID: 29938558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technical note: The use of 3D printing in dental anthropology collections.
    Fiorenza L; Yong R; Ranjitkar S; Hughes T; Quayle M; McMenamin PG; Kaidonis J; Townsend GC; Adams JW
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 Oct; 167(2):400-406. PubMed ID: 30129183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Denture flask fabrication using fused deposition modeling three-dimensional printing.
    Kim H; Lee D; Young Lee S; Yang H; Park SW; Lim HP; Yun KD; Park C
    J Prosthodont Res; 2020 Apr; 64(2):231-234. PubMed ID: 31699615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of Two 3D Printers for Guided Implant Surgery.
    Sommacal B; Savic M; Filippi A; Kühl S; Thieringer FM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):743–746. PubMed ID: 29543930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.