These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32069811)

  • 21. The Utility of DSRC and V2X in Road Safety Applications and Intelligent Parking: Similarities, Differences, and the Future of Vehicular Communication.
    Zadobrischi E; Dimian M; Negru M
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Oct; 21(21):. PubMed ID: 34770544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A problem of the safety of vulnerable road users in Montenegro.
    Čabarkapa M
    Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot; 2018 Dec; 25(4):352-364. PubMed ID: 29400606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Interactions Between Heavy Trucks and Vulnerable Road Users-A Systematic Review to Inform the Interactive Capabilities of Highly Automated Trucks.
    Fabricius V; Habibovic A; Rizgary D; Andersson J; Wärnestål P
    Front Robot AI; 2022; 9():818019. PubMed ID: 35316985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of Safety Message Generation Rules on the Awareness of Vulnerable Road Users.
    Lara T; Yáñez A; Céspedes S; Hafid AS
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 May; 21(10):. PubMed ID: 34066223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Modeling pedestrian gap crossing index under mixed traffic condition.
    Naser MM; Zulkiple A; Al Bargi WA; Khalifa NA; Daniel BD
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():91-98. PubMed ID: 29203029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Walking the talk: Comparing pedestrian 'activity as imagined' with 'activity as done'.
    Read GJM; Stevens EL; Lenné MG; Stanton NA; Walker GH; Salmon PM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Apr; 113():74-84. PubMed ID: 29407671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessing and Mapping of Road Surface Roughness based on GPS and Accelerometer Sensors on Bicycle-Mounted Smartphones.
    Zang K; Shen J; Huang H; Wan M; Shi J
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Mar; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 29562731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pedestrian Detection Algorithm for Intelligent Vehicles in Complex Scenarios.
    Cao J; Song C; Peng S; Song S; Zhang X; Shao Y; Xiao F
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jun; 20(13):. PubMed ID: 32610635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pedestrian Injury Outcome as a Function of Vehicle Market Group in Victoria, Australia.
    D'elia A; Newstead S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(7):709-14. PubMed ID: 25665142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The road to recovery for vulnerable road users hospitalised for orthopaedic injury following an on-road crash.
    Devlin A; Beck B; Simpson PM; Ekegren CL; Giummarra MJ; Edwards ER; Cameron PA; Liew S; Oppy A; Richardson M; Page R; Gabbe BJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Nov; 132():105279. PubMed ID: 31491683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Rethinking infrastructure design: evaluating pedestrians and VRUs' psychophysiological and behavioral responses to different roadway designs.
    Guo X; Angulo A; Tavakoli A; Robartes E; Chen TD; Heydarian A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):4278. PubMed ID: 36922522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pedestrian falls: A review of the literature and future research directions.
    Schepers P; den Brinker B; Methorst R; Helbich M
    J Safety Res; 2017 Sep; 62():227-234. PubMed ID: 28882270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of pedestrian safety at intersections: A theoretical framework based on pedestrian-vehicle interaction patterns.
    Ni Y; Wang M; Sun J; Li K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():118-129. PubMed ID: 27521905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of epidemiology and injury profile between vulnerable road users and motor vehicle occupants in road traffic fatalities.
    Kim SC; Lee HJ; Kim JM; Kong SY; Park JS; Jeon HJ; In YN; Kim H; Lee SW; Kim YT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(6):581-587. PubMed ID: 31329479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Observing the observation of (vulnerable) road user behaviour and traffic safety: A scoping review.
    van Haperen W; Riaz MS; Daniels S; Saunier N; Brijs T; Wets G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Feb; 123():211-221. PubMed ID: 30529992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Can cyclist safety be improved with intelligent transport systems?
    Silla A; Leden L; Rämä P; Scholliers J; Van Noort M; Bell D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Aug; 105():134-145. PubMed ID: 27189629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lateral Motion Prediction of On-Road Preceding Vehicles: A Data-Driven Approach.
    Wang C; Delport J; Wang Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 May; 19(9):. PubMed ID: 31067760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Human Activity Recognition Using Inertial Sensors in a Smartphone: An Overview.
    Sousa Lima W; Souto E; El-Khatib K; Jalali R; Gama J
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Jul; 19(14):. PubMed ID: 31330919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment pedestrian crossing safety using vehicle-pedestrian interaction data through two different approaches: Fixed videography (FV) vs In-Motion Videography (IMV).
    Sheykhfard A; Haghighi F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 144():105661. PubMed ID: 32634763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The epidemiology of pedestrian fatalities and substance use in Georgia, United States, 2007-2016.
    Thomas M; Williams T; Jones J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jan; 134():105329. PubMed ID: 31704642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.