These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32070212)

  • 1. Effects of perceptual load on eyewitness memory are moderated by individual differences in cognitive ability.
    Greene CM; Maloney-Derham R; Mulligan K
    Memory; 2020 Apr; 28(4):450-460. PubMed ID: 32070212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using metamemory measures and memory tests to estimate eyewitness free recall performance.
    Saraiva RB; Hope L; Horselenberg R; Ost J; Sauer JD; van Koppen PJ
    Memory; 2020 Jan; 28(1):94-106. PubMed ID: 31699019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual Load Affects Eyewitness Accuracy and Susceptibility to Leading Questions.
    Murphy G; Greene CM
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1322. PubMed ID: 27625628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Telling a good story: The effects of memory retrieval and context processing on eyewitness suggestibility.
    LaPaglia JA; Chan JCK
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212592. PubMed ID: 30789952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recalling a witnessed event increases eyewitness suggestibility: the reversed testing effect.
    Chan JC; Thomas AK; Bulevich JB
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Jan; 20(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 19037905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual differences impact memory for a crime: A study on executive functions resources.
    Battista F; Otgaar H; Lanciano T; Curci A
    Conscious Cogn; 2020 Sep; 84():103000. PubMed ID: 32828004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do cognitive abilities reduce eyewitness susceptibility to the misinformation effect? A systematic review.
    Brassil M; O'Mahony C; Greene CM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38696106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-relevance enhances susceptibility to false memory.
    Wang J; Wang B; Otgaar H; Patihis L; Sauerland M
    Behav Sci Law; 2024; 42(2):79-95. PubMed ID: 38291970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alcohol-induced retrograde facilitation renders witnesses of crime less suggestible to misinformation.
    Gawrylowicz J; Ridley AM; Albery IP; Barnoth E; Young J
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2017 Apr; 234(8):1267-1275. PubMed ID: 28214996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual differences in working memory capacity determine the effects of oculomotor task load on concurrent word recall performance.
    Lee EJ; Kwon G; Lee A; Ghajar J; Suh M
    Brain Res; 2011 Jul; 1399():59-65. PubMed ID: 21645879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High perceptual load makes everybody equal: eliminating individual differences in distractibility with load.
    Forster S; Lavie N
    Psychol Sci; 2007 May; 18(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 17576274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing the influence of directly vs. indirectly encountered post-event misinformation on eyewitness remembering.
    Blank H; Ost J; Davies J; Jones G; Lambert K; Salmon K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):635-41. PubMed ID: 24184995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The medium and the message: Comparing the effectiveness of six methods of misinformation delivery in an eyewitness memory paradigm.
    Greene CM; Bradshaw R; Huston C; Murphy G
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2022 Dec; 28(4):677-693. PubMed ID: 34110859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of co-witness discussion on confidence and precision in eyewitness memory reports.
    Rechdan J; Hope L; Sauer JD; Sauerland M; Ost J; Merckelbach H
    Memory; 2018 Aug; 26(7):904-912. PubMed ID: 29534645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The intoxicated co-witness: effects of alcohol and dyadic discussion on memory conformity and event recall.
    Bartlett G; Gawrylowicz J; Frings D; Albery IP
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2021 Jun; 238(6):1485-1493. PubMed ID: 33566113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stopping crime? The effect of crime re-enactments on eyewitness memory.
    Cullen HJ; Paterson HM; van Golde C
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(2):286-309. PubMed ID: 34712097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Memory for a staged criminal event witnessed live and on video.
    Ihlebaek C; Løve T; Eilertsen DE; Magnussen S
    Memory; 2003 May; 11(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 12908679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-lasting positive effects of collaborative remembering on false assents to misleading questions.
    Rossi-Arnaud C; Spataro P; Bhatia D; Doricchi F; Mastroberardino S; Cestari V
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Feb; 203():102986. PubMed ID: 31887634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extracting the truth from conflicting eyewitness reports: a formal modeling approach.
    Waubert de Puiseau B; Aßfalg A; Erdfelder E; Bernstein DM
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):390-403. PubMed ID: 23088437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Event-related potentials index cognitive style differences during a serial-order recall task.
    Goode PE; Goddard PH; Pascual-Leone J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2002 Feb; 43(2):123-40. PubMed ID: 11809516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.