130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3207108)
1. Significance and use of threshold limit values with reference to "Corporate Influence on Threshold Limit Values" by Castleman and Ziem.
Tsuchiya K
Am J Ind Med; 1988; 14(2):215-6. PubMed ID: 3207108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Corporate influence on threshold limit values by Castleman and Ziem.
Frank AL
Am J Ind Med; 1988; 13(5):607-8. PubMed ID: 3376951
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. On "Corporate influence on threshold limit values" by Castleman and Ziem.
Richter ED
Am J Ind Med; 1988; 14(3):365-8. PubMed ID: 3189353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comments on the article by Castleman and Ziem.
Djuric D
Am J Ind Med; 1988; 13(5):613-4. PubMed ID: 3376954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [It is not dangerous says employer: up to fivefold of the limit values of anesthetic gases].
Andresen B
Sygeplejersken; 1981 Feb; 81(6):14-6. PubMed ID: 6908281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Corporate influence on threshold limit values.
Davis JM
Am J Ind Med; 1988; 13(5):615. PubMed ID: 3376955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Occupational exposure limits: their critical role in preventive medicine and risk management.
Paustenbach DJ
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 May; 51(5):A332-6. PubMed ID: 2346110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of exposure to airborne particles in the work environment.
WHO Offset Publ; 1984; (80):1-75. PubMed ID: 6475313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Danish Hospital Institute on the currently observed health threshold limit values for anesthetic gases: safety conditions satisfactory if thresholds are observed].
Fialla J; Andresen B
Sygeplejersken; 1981 Jul; 81(26):34-6. PubMed ID: 6913179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Threshold limit values: any alternative?
Stokinger HE
Am J Ind Med; 1988; 14(2):231-2. PubMed ID: 3207111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Criteria and standards for occupational exposures to airborne chemicals.
Lippmann M
Clin Podiatr Med Surg; 1987 Jul; 4(3):619-28. PubMed ID: 2955877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Assessment of exposure at the work site by biological monitoring].
Jost M
Ther Umsch; 1989 Nov; 46(11):780-5. PubMed ID: 2688170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Biological monitoring at the work site].
Winker N
Pneumologie; 1990 Jul; 44(7):875-9. PubMed ID: 2399234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Setting recommended limits for occupational exposure.
Silk SJ
Ann Occup Hyg; 1987; 31(1):91-3. PubMed ID: 3592467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Occupational health issues related to maximum allowable content of aromatic substances in the air].
Budarina OV
Gig Sanit; 2002; (4):49-51. PubMed ID: 12380508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Threshold limit values: a balanced report.
Cox GV
Am J Ind Med; 1988; 14(2):233-4. PubMed ID: 3207112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Reducing the exposure risk to formaldehyde in the biopsy laboratory].
Schulze HD; Winter CD; Deutschmann E
Z Gesamte Hyg; 1987 Dec; 33(12):645-7. PubMed ID: 3442064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Industrial pollution by solvents with special reference to limited values for mixtures].
De Rosa E; Brighenti F; Cocheo V; Bartolucci GB
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1978; 14(3):463-7. PubMed ID: 755398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ["When should a substance be designated as sensitizing for the skin ("sh") or for the airways ("sa")"?"].
Schnuch A; Lessmann H; Schulz KH; Becker D; Diepgen TL; Drexler H; Erdmann S; Fartasch M; Greim H; Greim H; Kricke-Helling P; Merget R; Merk H; Nowak D; Rothe A; Stropp G; Uter W; Wallenstein G
Pneumologie; 2002 May; 56(5):304-8. PubMed ID: 12089648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Threshold limit values for extraordinary work schedules.
Roach SA
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1978 Apr; 39(4):345-8. PubMed ID: 645565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
