These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3207160)

  • 1. Standardization of the tangent screen examination: some neglected parameters.
    West RW
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Jul; 65(7):580-4. PubMed ID: 3207160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pseudo-loss of fixation in automated perimetry.
    Sanabria O; Feuer WJ; Anderson DR
    Ophthalmology; 1991 Jan; 98(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 2023737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Normal isopter position in the peripheral visual field in goldmann kinetic perimetry.
    Niederhauser S; Mojon DS
    Ophthalmologica; 2002; 216(6):406-8. PubMed ID: 12566882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Standardization of the Bausch & Lomb Autoplot tangent screen.
    Schoessler JP; Uniacke CA
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1977 Nov; 54(11):782-6. PubMed ID: 610439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of internal carotid endarterectomy on visual fields: a non-randomised prospective cohort study in Austria.
    Konstantiniuk P; Steinbrugger I; Koter S; Muehlsteiner J; Wedrich A; Cohnert T
    BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e017027. PubMed ID: 29042384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Self-illuminated stimulus for tangent screen perimetry.
    HARRINGTON DO
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1962 Aug; 54():301-3. PubMed ID: 13904801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crowding of the peripheral nasal isopters in glaucoma.
    de Oliveira Rassi M; Shields MB
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1982 Jul; 94(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 7091280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the utility of reliability indices for automated visual fields. Testing ocular hypertensives.
    Bickler-Bluth M; Trick GL; Kolker AE; Cooper DG
    Ophthalmology; 1989 May; 96(5):616-9. PubMed ID: 2748118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of a multi-fixation campimeter for the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Mutlukan E; Damato BE; Jay JL
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1993 Jun; 77(6):332-8. PubMed ID: 8318478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New digital methods: remodelling the harms tangent scale setting.
    Leitritz MA; Bende M; Jiang L; Prokoph J; Ziemssen F; Bartz-Schmidt KU; Bende T; Besch D
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 May; 256(5):975-982. PubMed ID: 29497810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The normal age-corrected and reaction time-corrected isopter derived by semi-automated kinetic perimetry.
    Vonthein R; Rauscher S; Paetzold J; Nowomiejska K; Krapp E; Hermann A; Sadowski B; Chaumette C; Wild JM; Schiefer U
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1065-72. PubMed ID: 17331580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual field testing with red targets.
    Mindel JS; Safir A; Schare PW
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1983 Jun; 101(6):927-9. PubMed ID: 6860207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The application of chromatic dark-adapted kinetic perimetry to retinal diseases.
    Rotenstreich Y; Fishman GA; Lindeman M; Alexander KR
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Jun; 111(6):1222-7. PubMed ID: 15177975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Static and kinetic visual field testing. Reproducibility in normal volunteers.
    Parrish RK; Schiffman J; Anderson DR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1984 Oct; 102(10):1497-502. PubMed ID: 6487115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of visual field results over repeated testing.
    Katz J; Sommer A; Witt K
    Ophthalmology; 1991 Jan; 98(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 2023736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tangent screen perimetry using twin test objects.
    Coyle JT; Milam DF
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1977 Jun; 83(6):923-4. PubMed ID: 868998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variability and Errors of Manually Digitized Goldmann Visual Fields.
    Barry MP; Bittner AK; Yang L; Marcus R; Iftikhar MH; Dagnelie G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Jul; 93(7):720-30. PubMed ID: 27058594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability indexes of automated perimetric tests.
    Katz J; Sommer A
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1988 Sep; 106(9):1252-4. PubMed ID: 3046588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of functional visual field loss by automated static perimetry.
    Frisén L
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 92(8):805-9. PubMed ID: 24698019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variability in isopter position and fatigue during semi-automated kinetic perimetry.
    Nowomiejska K; Brzozowska A; Zarnowski T; Rejdak R; Weleber RG; Schiefer U
    Ophthalmologica; 2012; 227(3):166-72. PubMed ID: 22205248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.