174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32072443)
1. An assessment of the quality of optical coherence tomography image acquisition.
Iarossi Zago E; Samdani AJ; Pereira GTR; Vergara-Martel A; Alaiti MA; Dallan LA; Ely Pizzato P; Zimin V; Fares A; Bezerra HG
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jun; 36(6):1013-1020. PubMed ID: 32072443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease-a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
Fujino Y; Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Wang W; Yamamoto H; Chamié D; Kanaya T; Mehanna E; Tahara S; Nakamura S; Costa MA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E173-83. PubMed ID: 23359350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interstudy reproducibility of the second generation, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography in patients with coronary artery disease and comparison with intravascular ultrasound: a study applying automated contour detection.
Jamil Z; Tearney G; Bruining N; Sihan K; van Soest G; Ligthart J; van Domburg R; Bouma B; Regar E
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 29(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 22639296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In-vitro and in-vivo imaging of coronary artery stents with Heartbeat OCT.
Cecchetti L; Wang T; Hoogendoorn A; Witberg KT; Ligthart JMR; Daemen J; van Beusekom HMM; Pfeiffer T; Huber RA; Wentzel JJ; van der Steen AFW; van Soest G
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jun; 36(6):1021-1029. PubMed ID: 32112229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the influence of cardiac motion on the accuracy and reproducibility of longitudinal measurements and the corresponding image quality in optical frequency domain imaging: an ex vivo investigation of the optimal pullback speed.
Koyama K; Yoneyama K; Mitarai T; Kuwata S; Kongoji K; Harada T; Akashi YJ
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Aug; 31(6):1115-23. PubMed ID: 25971841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In-stent fractional flow reserve variations and related optical coherence tomography findings: the FFR-OCT co-registration study.
Pyxaras SA; Adriaenssens T; Barbato E; Ughi GJ; Di Serafino L; De Vroey F; Toth G; Tu S; Reiber JHC; Bax JJ; Wijns W
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 34(4):495-502. PubMed ID: 29080150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Techniques to Optimize the Use of Optical Coherence Tomography: Insights from the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database.
Shlofmitz E; Garcia-Garcia HM; Rogers T; Khalid N; Chen Y; Kajita AH; Khan JM; Iantorno M; Gallino RA; Bernardo NL; Hashim H; Torguson R; Waksman R
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Jun; 20(6):507-512. PubMed ID: 30962083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A formula to calculate the contrast volume required for optimal imaging quality in optical coherence tomography with non-occlusive technique.
Gutiérrez-Chico JL; Cortés C; Schincariol M; Jaguszewski M
Cardiol J; 2018; 25(5):574-581. PubMed ID: 30246237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automatic segmentation of optical coherence tomography pullbacks of coronary arteries treated with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Application to hemodynamics modeling.
Bologna M; Migliori S; Montin E; Rampat R; Dubini G; Migliavacca F; Mainardi L; Chiastra C
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213603. PubMed ID: 30870477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
Maehara A; Ben-Yehuda O; Ali Z; Wijns W; Bezerra HG; Shite J; Généreux P; Nichols M; Jenkins P; Witzenbichler B; Mintz GS; Stone GW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of observer variability and reliability in the assessment of stent deployment: the OCTIVUS study.
Magnus PC; Jayne JE; Garcia-Garcia HM; Swart M; van Es GA; Tijssen J; Kaplan AV
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 25620044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel method to assess coronary artery bifurcations by OCT: cut-plane analysis for side-branch ostial assessment from a main-vessel pullback.
Karanasos A; Tu S; van Ditzhuijzen NS; Ligthart JM; Witberg K; Van Mieghem N; van Geuns RJ; de Jaegere P; Zijlstra F; Reiber JH; Regar E
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Feb; 16(2):177-89. PubMed ID: 25227268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Second-generation optical coherence tomography in clinical practice. High-speed data acquisition is highly reproducible in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Gonzalo N; Tearney GJ; Serruys PW; van Soest G; Okamura T; García-García HM; Jan van Geuns R; van der Ent M; Ligthart J; Bouma BE; Regar E
Rev Esp Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 63(8):893-903. PubMed ID: 20738934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Practical Approach to Assessing Stent Results with IVUS or OCT.
Hachinohe D; Mitomo S; Candilio L; Latib A
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J; 2018; 14(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 29623170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective, single-center, randomized study to assess whether automated coregistration of optical coherence tomography with angiography can reduce geographic miss.
Koyama K; Fujino A; Maehara A; Yamamoto MH; Alexandru D; Jennings J; Krug P; Santiago LM; Murray M; Bongiovanni L; Lee T; Kim SY; Wang X; Lin Y; Matsumura M; Ali ZA; Sosa F; Haag E; Mintz GS; Shlofmitz RA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb; 93(3):411-418. PubMed ID: 30345635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Angiography alone versus angiography plus optical coherence tomography to guide decision-making during percutaneous coronary intervention: the Centro per la Lotta contro l'Infarto-Optimisation of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CLI-OPCI) study.
Prati F; Di Vito L; Biondi-Zoccai G; Occhipinti M; La Manna A; Tamburino C; Burzotta F; Trani C; Porto I; Ramazzotti V; Imola F; Manzoli A; Materia L; Cremonesi A; Albertucci M
EuroIntervention; 2012 Nov; 8(7):823-9. PubMed ID: 23034247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of a new generation intracoronary optical coherence tomography imaging system with fast pullback.
Nishi T; Kume T; Yamada R; Koto S; Sasahira Y; Okamoto H; Tamada T; Koyama T; Imai K; Neishi Y; Ughi GJ; Uemura S
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Feb; 101(3):520-527. PubMed ID: 36740230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the efficacy of saline flush in frequency-domain optical coherence tomography for intracoronary imaging.
Kimura M; Takeda T; Tsujino Y; Matsumoto Y; Yamaji M; Sakaguchi T; Maeda K; Mabuchi H; Murakami T
Heart Vessels; 2024 Apr; 39(4):310-318. PubMed ID: 38062328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variability in quantitative and qualitative analysis of intravascular ultrasound and frequency domain optical coherence tomography.
Abnousi F; Waseda K; Kume T; Otake H; Kawarada O; Yong CM; Fitzgerald PJ; Honda Y; Yeung AC; Fearon WF
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E192-9. PubMed ID: 23412754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Feasibility Study of the DyeVert™ Plus Contrast Reduction System to Reduce Contrast Media Volumes in Percutaneous Coronary Procedures Using Optical Coherence Tomography.
Zimin VN; Jones MR; Richmond Iv T; Durieux JC; Alaiti AM; Pereira GTR; Vergara-Martel A; Pizzato PE; Zago EI; Dallan LA; Bezerra HG
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2021 Sep; 30():40-46. PubMed ID: 33046416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
