These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32072922)

  • 1. The ecological rationality of explanatory reasoning.
    Douven I
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2020 Feb; 79():1-14. PubMed ID: 32072922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How explanation guides belief change.
    Douven I
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2021 Oct; 25(10):829-830. PubMed ID: 34452826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian probability estimates are not necessary to make choices satisfying Bayes' rule in elementary situations.
    Domurat A; Kowalczuk O; Idzikowska K; Borzymowska Z; Nowak-Przygodzka M
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1194. PubMed ID: 26347676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Invariants in probabilistic reasoning.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Cogn Psychol; 2018 Feb; 100():1-16. PubMed ID: 29220640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.
    Oaksford M; Chater N
    Behav Brain Sci; 2009 Feb; 32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. PubMed ID: 19210833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of explanatory considerations in updating.
    Douven I; Schupbach JN
    Cognition; 2015 Sep; 142():299-311. PubMed ID: 26069937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are Jurors Intuitive Statisticians? Bayesian Causal Reasoning in Legal Contexts.
    Shengelia T; Lagnado D
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():519262. PubMed ID: 33613348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Best, second-best, and good-enough explanations: How they matter to reasoning.
    Douven I; Mirabile P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1792-1813. PubMed ID: 29389197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revisiting the narrow latent scope bias in explanatory reasoning.
    Stephan S
    Cognition; 2023 Dec; 241():105630. PubMed ID: 37806209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A description-experience gap in statistical intuitions: Of smart babies, risk-savvy chimps, intuitive statisticians, and stupid grown-ups.
    Schulze C; Hertwig R
    Cognition; 2021 May; 210():104580. PubMed ID: 33667974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Updating, evidence evaluation, and operator availability: A theoretical framework for understanding belief.
    Sommer J; Musolino J; Hemmer P
    Psychol Rev; 2024 Mar; 131(2):373-401. PubMed ID: 37589708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimism where there is none: Asymmetric belief updating observed with valence-neutral life events.
    Burton JW; Harris AJL; Shah P; Hahn U
    Cognition; 2022 Jan; 218():104939. PubMed ID: 34717257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rationality, the Bayesian standpoint, and the Monty-Hall problem.
    Baratgin J
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1168. PubMed ID: 26321986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Good fences make for good neighbors but bad science: a review of what improves Bayesian reasoning and why.
    Brase GL; Hill WT
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():340. PubMed ID: 25873904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Probabilistic alternatives to Bayesianism: the case of explanationism.
    Douven I; Schupbach JN
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():459. PubMed ID: 25964769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What facilitates Bayesian reasoning? A crucial test of ecological rationality versus nested sets hypotheses.
    Brase G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Apr; 28(2):703-709. PubMed ID: 32885405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rule-based reasoning is fast and belief-based reasoning can be slow: Challenging current explanations of belief-bias and base-rate neglect.
    Newman IR; Gibb M; Thompson VA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1154-1170. PubMed ID: 28191989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using alien coins to test whether simple inference is Bayesian.
    Cassey P; Hawkins GE; Donkin C; Brown SD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Mar; 42(3):497-503. PubMed ID: 26461034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reasoning, decision making and rationality.
    Evans JS; Over DE; Manktelow KI
    Cognition; 1993; 49(1-2):165-87. PubMed ID: 8287673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian Occam's Razor Is a Razor of the People.
    Blanchard T; Lombrozo T; Nichols S
    Cogn Sci; 2018 May; 42(4):1345-1359. PubMed ID: 29160570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.