106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32073511)
1. The prognostic role of BRAF and WNT pathways activation in kinase inhibitors-naïve clinical stage III cutaneous melanoma.
Kowalik A; Jurkowska M; Mierzejewska E; Ługowska I; Gos A; Szumera-Ciećkiewicz A; Zięba S; Koseła-Paterczyk H; van der Oord J; Dębiec-Rychter M; Szamotulska K; Siedlecki J; Rutkowski P
Melanoma Res; 2020 Aug; 30(4):348-357. PubMed ID: 32073511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. BRAF mutation status is an independent prognostic factor for resected stage IIIB and IIIC melanoma: implications for melanoma staging and adjuvant therapy.
Barbour AP; Tang YH; Armour N; Dutton-Regester K; Krause L; Loffler KA; Lambie D; Burmeister B; Thomas J; Smithers BM; Hayward NK
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Oct; 50(15):2668-76. PubMed ID: 25070294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical and prognostic significance of BRAF V600E mutation in non-metastatic cutaneous melanoma patients.
Tas F; Erturk K
Neoplasma; 2019 Jul; 66(4):631-636. PubMed ID: 31058533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib versus placebo in patients with resected, BRAF
Dummer R; Brase JC; Garrett J; Campbell CD; Gasal E; Squires M; Gusenleitner D; Santinami M; Atkinson V; Mandalà M; Chiarion-Sileni V; Flaherty K; Larkin J; Robert C; Kefford R; Kirkwood JM; Hauschild A; Schadendorf D; Long GV
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Mar; 21(3):358-372. PubMed ID: 32007138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Presence of immune cells, low tumor proliferation and wild type BRAF mutation status is associated with a favourable clinical outcome in stage III cutaneous melanoma.
Falkenius J; Johansson H; Tuominen R; Frostvik Stolt M; Hansson J; Egyhazi Brage S
BMC Cancer; 2017 Aug; 17(1):584. PubMed ID: 28851300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic value of BRAF(V⁶⁰⁰) mutations in melanoma patients after resection of metastatic lymph nodes.
Moreau S; Saiag P; Aegerter P; Bosset D; Longvert C; Hélias-Rodzewicz Z; Marin C; Peschaud F; Chagnon S; Zimmermann U; Clerici T; Emile JF
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Dec; 19(13):4314-21. PubMed ID: 22772867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinicopathological features and clinical outcomes associated with TP53 and BRAF
Kim DW; Haydu LE; Joon AY; Bassett RL; Siroy AE; Tetzlaff MT; Routbort MJ; Amaria RN; Wargo JA; McQuade JL; Kemnade J; Hwu P; Woodman SE; Roszik J; Kim KB; Gershenwald JE; Lazar AJ; Davies MA
Cancer; 2017 Apr; 123(8):1372-1381. PubMed ID: 27911979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical significance of BRAF V600E mutational status in capsular nevi of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma.
Siroy AE; Aung PP; Torres-Cabala CA; Tetzlaff MT; Nagarajan P; Milton DR; Curry JL; Ivan D; Prieto VG
Hum Pathol; 2017 Jan; 59():48-54. PubMed ID: 27666765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Association Between NRAS and BRAF Mutational Status and Melanoma-Specific Survival Among Patients With Higher-Risk Primary Melanoma.
Thomas NE; Edmiston SN; Alexander A; Groben PA; Parrish E; Kricker A; Armstrong BK; Anton-Culver H; Gruber SB; From L; Busam KJ; Hao H; Orlow I; Kanetsky PA; Luo L; Reiner AS; Paine S; Frank JS; Bramson JI; Marrett LD; Gallagher RP; Zanetti R; Rosso S; Dwyer T; Cust AE; Ollila DW; Begg CB; Berwick M; Conway K;
JAMA Oncol; 2015 Jun; 1(3):359-68. PubMed ID: 26146664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: a German study from routine care.
Heppt MV; Siepmann T; Engel J; Schubert-Fritschle G; Eckel R; Mirlach L; Kirchner T; Jung A; Gesierich A; Ruzicka T; Flaig MJ; Berking C
BMC Cancer; 2017 Aug; 17(1):536. PubMed ID: 28797232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conjunctival malignant melanoma in Denmark: epidemiology, treatment and prognosis with special emphasis on tumorigenesis and genetic profile.
Larsen AC
Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 94 Thesis 1():1-27. PubMed ID: 27192168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic significance of tumor iNOS and COX-2 in stage III malignant cutaneous melanoma.
Johansson CC; Egyházi S; Masucci G; Harlin H; Mougiakakos D; Poschke I; Nilsson B; Garberg L; Tuominen R; Linden D; Stolt MF; Hansson J; Kiessling R
Cancer Immunol Immunother; 2009 Jul; 58(7):1085-94. PubMed ID: 19039588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma (COLUMBUS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.
Dummer R; Ascierto PA; Gogas HJ; Arance A; Mandala M; Liszkay G; Garbe C; Schadendorf D; Krajsova I; Gutzmer R; Chiarion-Sileni V; Dutriaux C; de Groot JWB; Yamazaki N; Loquai C; Moutouh-de Parseval LA; Pickard MD; Sandor V; Robert C; Flaherty KT
Lancet Oncol; 2018 May; 19(5):603-615. PubMed ID: 29573941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. BRAF mutational status as a prognostic marker for survival in malignant melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ny L; Hernberg M; Nyakas M; Koivunen J; Oddershede L; Yoon M; Wang X; Guyot P; Geisler J
Acta Oncol; 2020 Jul; 59(7):833-844. PubMed ID: 32285732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Is BRAF a prognostic factor in stage III skin melanoma? A retrospective study of 72 patients after positive sentinel lymph node dissection.
Picard M; Pham Dang N; D'Incan M; Mansard S; Dechelotte P; Pereira B; Mondie JM; Barthelemy I
Br J Dermatol; 2014 Jul; 171(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 24602025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic and predictive values of oncogenic BRAF, NRAS, c-KIT and MITF in cutaneous and mucous melanoma.
Pracht M; Mogha A; Lespagnol A; Fautrel A; Mouchet N; Le Gall F; Paumier V; Lefeuvre-Plesse C; Rioux-Leclerc N; Mosser J; Oger E; Adamski H; Galibert MD; Lesimple T
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2015 Aug; 29(8):1530-8. PubMed ID: 25623140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17.
Bai X; Kong Y; Chi Z; Sheng X; Cui C; Wang X; Mao L; Tang B; Li S; Lian B; Yan X; Zhou L; Dai J; Guo J; Si L
Clin Cancer Res; 2017 Oct; 23(20):6120-6127. PubMed ID: 28720667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Lymph node metastases of melanoma: challenges for BRAF mutation detection.
Chen G; Dudley J; Tseng LH; Smith K; Gurda GT; Gocke CD; Eshleman JR; Lin MT
Hum Pathol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 25456393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Usefulness of monitoring circulating tumor cells as a therapeutic biomarker in melanoma with BRAF mutation.
Kiniwa Y; Nakamura K; Mikoshiba A; Ashida A; Akiyama Y; Morimoto A; Okuyama R
BMC Cancer; 2021 Mar; 21(1):287. PubMed ID: 33731038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Coexistence of TERT promoter and BRAF mutations in cutaneous melanoma is associated with more clinicopathological features of aggressiveness.
Macerola E; Loggini B; Giannini R; Garavello G; Giordano M; Proietti A; Niccoli C; Basolo F; Fontanini G
Virchows Arch; 2015 Aug; 467(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 26055532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
