These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32073940)

  • 1. Participants' written informed consent in low-risk pragmatic clinical trials with medicines.
    Dal-Ré R
    Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol; 2020 Mar; 13(3):205-210. PubMed ID: 32073940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A limited number of medicines pragmatic trials had potential for waived informed consent following the 2016 CIOMS ethical guidelines.
    Dal-Ré R; Avendaño-Solà C; de Boer A; James SK; Rosendaal FR; Stephens R; Ioannidis JPA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Oct; 114():60-71. PubMed ID: 31212001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation.
    Goldstein CE; Weijer C; Brehaut JC; Fergusson DA; Grimshaw JM; Horn AR; Taljaard M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Feb; 19(1):14. PubMed ID: 29482537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inadequacy of ethical conduct and reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: Results from a systematic review.
    Taljaard M; Hemming K; Shah L; Giraudeau B; Grimshaw JM; Weijer C
    Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):333-341. PubMed ID: 28393537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patients' beliefs regarding informed consent for low-risk pragmatic trials.
    Dal-Ré R; Carcas AJ; Carné X; Wendler D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):145. PubMed ID: 28923007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cluster over individual randomization: are study design choices appropriately justified? Review of a random sample of trials.
    Taljaard M; Goldstein CE; Giraudeau B; Nicholls SG; Carroll K; Hey SP; Brehaut JC; Jairath V; London AJ; Eldridge SM; Grimshaw JM; Fergusson DA; Weijer C
    Clin Trials; 2020 Jun; 17(3):253-263. PubMed ID: 32367741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The ethical challenges raised in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: an interview study with key stakeholders.
    Nicholls SG; Carroll K; Zwarenstein M; Brehaut JC; Weijer C; Hey SP; Goldstein CE; Graham ID; Grimshaw JM; McKenzie JE; Fergusson DA; Taljaard M;
    Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):765. PubMed ID: 31870433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Who is willing to participate in low-risk pragmatic clinical trials without consent?
    Dal-Ré R; Carcas AJ; Carné X
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2017 Dec; 73(12):1557-1563. PubMed ID: 28900674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethics of Informed Consent for Pragmatic Trials with New Interventions.
    Kalkman S; Kim SYH; van Thiel GJMW; Grobbee DE; van Delden JJM
    Value Health; 2017; 20(7):902-908. PubMed ID: 28712619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Informed consent in cluster randomised trials: new and common ethical challenges.
    Lignou S
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Feb; 44(2):114-120. PubMed ID: 28780528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized, controlled trials as minimal risk: an ethical analysis.
    Morris MC; Nelson RM
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Mar; 35(3):940-4. PubMed ID: 17255879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Public preferences on written informed consent for low-risk pragmatic clinical trials in Spain.
    Dal-Ré R; Carcas AJ; Carné X; Wendler D
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2017 Sep; 83(9):1921-1931. PubMed ID: 28419518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stepped-wedge trials should be classified as research for the purpose of ethical review.
    Hemming K; Taljaard M; Marshall T; Goldstein CE; Weijer C
    Clin Trials; 2019 Dec; 16(6):580-588. PubMed ID: 31818147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [When the information provided to participants of a comparative effectiveness trial ends up in the court: The opening of Pandora's box?].
    Dal-Ré R; Omeñaca F; Gracia D
    Med Clin (Barc); 2016 Jul; 147(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 26961391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Members of research ethics committees accepted a modification of the randomized consent design.
    Schellings R; Kessels AG; Ter Riet G; Kleijnen J; Leffers P; Knottnerus JA; Sturmans F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 58(6):589-94. PubMed ID: 15878472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethics and practice of Trials within Cohorts: An emerging pragmatic trial design.
    Kim SY; Flory J; Relton C
    Clin Trials; 2018 Feb; 15(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 29224380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Loopholes in the Research Ethics System? Informed Consent Waivers in Cluster Randomized Trials with Individual-Level Intervention.
    London AJ; Taljaard M; Weijer C
    Ethics Hum Res; 2020 Nov; 42(6):21-28. PubMed ID: 33136332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developing a framework for the ethical design and conduct of pragmatic trials in healthcare: a mixed methods research protocol.
    Taljaard M; Weijer C; Grimshaw JM; Ali A; Brehaut JC; Campbell MK; Carroll K; Edwards S; Eldridge S; Forrest CB; Giraudeau B; Goldstein CE; Graham ID; Hemming K; Hey SP; Horn AR; Jairath V; Klassen TP; London AJ; Marlin S; Marshall JC; McIntyre L; McKenzie JE; Nicholls SG; Alison Paprica P; Zwarenstein M; Fergusson DA
    Trials; 2018 Sep; 19(1):525. PubMed ID: 30261933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ethics and regulatory complexities for pragmatic clinical trials.
    Sugarman J; Califf RM
    JAMA; 2014 Jun; 311(23):2381-2. PubMed ID: 24810723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.