130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32074039)
1. Are Antimony-Bismuth Aprons as Efficient as Lead Rubber Aprons in Providing Shielding against Scattered Radiation?
Johansen S; Hauge IHR; Hogg P; England A; Lança L; Gunn C; Sanderud A
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2018 Jun; 49(2):201-206. PubMed ID: 32074039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Not all lightweight lead aprons and thyroid shields are alike.
Fakhoury E; Provencher JA; Subramaniam R; Finlay DJ
J Vasc Surg; 2019 Jul; 70(1):246-250. PubMed ID: 30292602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the scattered radiations of lead and lead-free aprons in diagnostic radiology by MCNPX.
Tayebi M; Shooli FS; Saeedi-Moghadam M
Technol Health Care; 2017; 25(3):513-520. PubMed ID: 28085021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lead versus bismuth-antimony shield for fetal dose reduction at different gestational ages at CT pulmonary angiography.
Chatterson LC; Leswick DA; Fladeland DA; Hunt MM; Webster ST
Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):560-7. PubMed ID: 21555348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the radiation protection effect of different radiation protection aprons made of different materials.
König AM; Verbe Zoum J; Fiebich M; Abissi PW; Mahnken AH
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Jul; 164():110862. PubMed ID: 37209465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the transmitted exposure through lead equivalent aprons used in a radiology department, including the contribution from backscatter.
Christodoulou EG; Goodsitt MM; Larson SC; Darner KL; Satti J; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1033-8. PubMed ID: 12852526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How effective are lead-rubber aprons in protecting radiosensitive organs from secondary ionizing radiation?
Hayre CM; Bungay H; Jeffery C
Radiography (Lond); 2020 Nov; 26(4):e264-e269. PubMed ID: 32303421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Light-weight lead aprons--light on weight, protection or labelling accuracy?
Muir S; McLeod R; Dove R
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Jun; 28(2):128-30. PubMed ID: 16060320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Non-Lead Protective Aprons for the Protection of Interventional Radiology Physicians from Radiation Exposure in Clinical Settings: An Initial Study.
Kato M; Chida K; Munehisa M; Sato T; Inaba Y; Suzuki M; Zuguchi M
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 34573955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Experimental and theoretical studies on radiation protective effect of a lighter non-lead protective apron].
Takano Y; Okazaki K; Ono K; Kai M
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Jul; 61(7):1027-32. PubMed ID: 16049417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A model-based approach of scatter dose contributions and efficiency of apron shielding for radiation protection in CT.
Weber N; Monnin P; Elandoy C; Ding S
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):889-896. PubMed ID: 26112350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A simple quality control tool for assessing integrity of lead equivalent aprons.
Livingstone RS; Varghese A
Indian J Radiol Imaging; 2018; 28(2):258-262. PubMed ID: 30050253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of the Radiation Attenuation Properties of Several Lead Free Composites by Monte Carlo Simulation.
Kazempour M; Saeedimoghadam M; Shekoohi Shooli F; Shokrpour N
J Biomed Phys Eng; 2015 Jun; 5(2):67-76. PubMed ID: 26157732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality assurance of lead aprons for radiation protection.
Revathy P; Kaginelli SB
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2023 Dec; 199(20):2491-2494. PubMed ID: 38126849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of dose savings of lead and lightweight aprons for shielding of 99m-Technetium radiation.
Warren-Forward H; Cardew P; Smith B; Clack L; McWhirter K; Johnson S; Wessel K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 124(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17525062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the effectiveness of X-ray protective aprons in experimental and practical fields.
Mori H; Koshida K; Ishigamori O; Matsubara K
Radiol Phys Technol; 2014 Jan; 7(1):158-66. PubMed ID: 24338033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Influence of storage conditions and usage time on the quality of lead rubber].
Modlińska SM; Bosowska J; Cebula M
Med Pr; 2022 Feb; 73(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 34940763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Answers to if the Lead Aprons are Really Helpful in Nuclear Medicine from the Perspective of Spectroscopy.
He X; Zhao R; Rong L; Yao K; Chen S; Wei B
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 May; 174(4):558-564. PubMed ID: 27613748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose rates in nuclear medicine and the effectiveness of lead aprons: updating the department's knowledge on old and new procedures.
Young AM
Nucl Med Commun; 2013 Mar; 34(3):254-64. PubMed ID: 23353888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Physical analysis of the shielding capacity for a lightweight apron designed for shielding low intensity scattering X-rays.
Kim SC; Choi JR; Jeon BK
Sci Rep; 2016 Jul; 6():27721. PubMed ID: 27461510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
