290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32074656)
1. Aseptic Loosening of Porous Metaphyseal Sleeves and Tantalum Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.
Roach RP; Clair AJ; Behery OA; Thakkar SC; Iorio R; Deshmukh AJ
J Knee Surg; 2021 Aug; 34(10):1033-1041. PubMed ID: 32074656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Midterm Results of Porous Tantalum Femoral Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Potter GD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Aug; 98(15):1286-91. PubMed ID: 27489319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Survivorship of Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Hinged Knees and Tantalum Cones at Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.
Abdelaziz H; Jaramillo R; Gehrke T; Ohlmeier M; Citak M
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Dec; 34(12):3018-3022. PubMed ID: 31351856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical Management of Tibial Bone Loss in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes and Radiographic Analysis of Tantalum Cones, Titanium Cones and Titanium Sleeves.
Gibon E; Vasilopoulos T; Sipavicius E; Deen JT; Prieto HA; Gray CF; Parvataneni HK; Pulido L
Iowa Orthop J; 2022 Jun; 42(1):145-153. PubMed ID: 35821926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tantalum Cones for Severe Bone Defects in Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.
De Martino I; Mancino F; Di Matteo V; Singlitico A; Maccauro G; Gasparini G
J Arthroplasty; 2023 May; 38(5):886-892. PubMed ID: 36481282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survivorship of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Heidenreich MJ; Lanting BA; McCalden RW; Naudie DD; Howard JL; MacDonald SJ; Vasarhelyi EM
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jun; 37(6S):S263-S269. PubMed ID: 35257822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survivorship of Metaphyseal Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Chalmers BP; Desy NM; Pagnano MW; Trousdale RT; Taunton MJ
J Arthroplasty; 2017 May; 32(5):1565-1570. PubMed ID: 28109761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Management of the bone loss by metaphyseal sleeves in primary and revision knee arthroplasty: clinical experience and outcome after forty three cases.
Gill UN; Ahmed N; Noor SS; Memon IA; Memon ZA
Int Orthop; 2020 Nov; 44(11):2315-2320. PubMed ID: 32556384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Two sides of the same coin? Complications, clinical and radiological results-a systematic review of the literature.
Zanirato A; Formica M; Cavagnaro L; Divano S; Burastero G; Felli L
Musculoskelet Surg; 2020 Apr; 104(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 30879231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty?
Bohl DD; Brown NM; McDowell MA; Levine BR; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG; Della Valle CJ
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jan; 33(1):171-177. PubMed ID: 28844630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total knee arthroplasty revision with trabecular tantalum cones: Preliminary retrospective study of 51 patients from two centres with a minimal 2-year follow-up.
Girerd D; Parratte S; Lunebourg A; Boureau F; Ollivier M; Pasquier G; Putman S; Migaud H; Argenson JN
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Jun; 102(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 27052939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Metaphyseal Fixation Using Highly Porous Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum Two Year Follow Up Study.
Denehy KM; Abhari S; Krebs VE; Higuera-Rueda CA; Samuel LT; Sultan AA; Mont MA; Malkani AL
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2439-2443. PubMed ID: 31000405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves provides radiographic ingrowth and stable fixation.
Fedorka CJ; Chen AF; Pagnotto MR; Crossett LS; Klatt BA
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 May; 26(5):1500-1505. PubMed ID: 28314891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cones and sleeves present good survival and clinical outcome in revision total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.
Fischer LT; Heinecke M; Röhner E; Schlattmann P; Matziolis G
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2022 Aug; 30(8):2824-2837. PubMed ID: 34389876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High survival rate at mid-term follow up of porous tantalum cones for bone defects in revision total knee replacement: A 3-11 years follow up report.
Rossi SMP; Perticarini L; Ghiara M; Jannelli E; Cortesi L; Benazzo F
Knee; 2022 Mar; 35():175-182. PubMed ID: 35349974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Excellent mid- to long-term survival of tantalum metal cones in a case series of revision knee arthroplasty with severe bony defects.
Eder-Halbedl M; Fink A; Pietsch M; Djahani O; Hofmann S
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Dec; 31(12):5496-5506. PubMed ID: 37819600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up.
Kamath AF; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 25653322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Excellent two-year survivorship of 3D-printed metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Tetreault MW; Perry KI; Pagnano MW; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
Bone Joint J; 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):107-115. PubMed ID: 32475272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Metaphyseal Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Provide Reliable Fixation and Excellent Medium to Long-Term Implant Survivorship.
Bloch BV; Shannak OA; Palan J; Phillips JRA; James PJ
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Feb; 35(2):495-499. PubMed ID: 31606290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mid-term results of tibial cones : reasonable survivorship but increased failure in those with significant bone loss and prior infection.
Hernandez NM; Hinton ZW; Wu CJ; Ryan SP; Bolognesi MP
Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):158-164. PubMed ID: 34053275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
