These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32074656)

  • 1. Aseptic Loosening of Porous Metaphyseal Sleeves and Tantalum Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.
    Roach RP; Clair AJ; Behery OA; Thakkar SC; Iorio R; Deshmukh AJ
    J Knee Surg; 2021 Aug; 34(10):1033-1041. PubMed ID: 32074656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Porous Tantalum Tibial Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Excellent 10-Year Survivorship.
    Hadley ML; Harmer JR; Wright BH; Larson DR; Abdel MP; Berry DJ; Lewallen DG
    J Arthroplasty; 2024 Aug; 39(8S1):S263-S269. PubMed ID: 38677340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Midterm Results of Porous Tantalum Femoral Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Potter GD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Aug; 98(15):1286-91. PubMed ID: 27489319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty are Reliable for Fixation at Mean 5-Year Follow-Up.
    Kayani B; Howard LC; Neufeld ME; Greidanus NV; Masri BA; Garbuz DS
    J Arthroplasty; 2024 Sep; 39(9S2):S374-S379. PubMed ID: 38508344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical Survivorship of Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Hinged Knees and Tantalum Cones at Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.
    Abdelaziz H; Jaramillo R; Gehrke T; Ohlmeier M; Citak M
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Dec; 34(12):3018-3022. PubMed ID: 31351856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surgical Management of Tibial Bone Loss in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes and Radiographic Analysis of Tantalum Cones, Titanium Cones and Titanium Sleeves.
    Gibon E; Vasilopoulos T; Sipavicius E; Deen JT; Prieto HA; Gray CF; Parvataneni HK; Pulido L
    Iowa Orthop J; 2022 Jun; 42(1):145-153. PubMed ID: 35821926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tantalum Cones for Severe Bone Defects in Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.
    De Martino I; Mancino F; Di Matteo V; Singlitico A; Maccauro G; Gasparini G
    J Arthroplasty; 2023 May; 38(5):886-892. PubMed ID: 36481282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Survivorship of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Heidenreich MJ; Lanting BA; McCalden RW; Naudie DD; Howard JL; MacDonald SJ; Vasarhelyi EM
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jun; 37(6S):S263-S269. PubMed ID: 35257822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survivorship of Metaphyseal Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Chalmers BP; Desy NM; Pagnano MW; Trousdale RT; Taunton MJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 May; 32(5):1565-1570. PubMed ID: 28109761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Management of the bone loss by metaphyseal sleeves in primary and revision knee arthroplasty: clinical experience and outcome after forty three cases.
    Gill UN; Ahmed N; Noor SS; Memon IA; Memon ZA
    Int Orthop; 2020 Nov; 44(11):2315-2320. PubMed ID: 32556384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Two sides of the same coin? Complications, clinical and radiological results-a systematic review of the literature.
    Zanirato A; Formica M; Cavagnaro L; Divano S; Burastero G; Felli L
    Musculoskelet Surg; 2020 Apr; 104(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 30879231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty?
    Bohl DD; Brown NM; McDowell MA; Levine BR; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG; Della Valle CJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jan; 33(1):171-177. PubMed ID: 28844630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Total knee arthroplasty revision with trabecular tantalum cones: Preliminary retrospective study of 51 patients from two centres with a minimal 2-year follow-up.
    Girerd D; Parratte S; Lunebourg A; Boureau F; Ollivier M; Pasquier G; Putman S; Migaud H; Argenson JN
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Jun; 102(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 27052939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metaphyseal Fixation Using Highly Porous Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum Two Year Follow Up Study.
    Denehy KM; Abhari S; Krebs VE; Higuera-Rueda CA; Samuel LT; Sultan AA; Mont MA; Malkani AL
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2439-2443. PubMed ID: 31000405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves provides radiographic ingrowth and stable fixation.
    Fedorka CJ; Chen AF; Pagnotto MR; Crossett LS; Klatt BA
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 May; 26(5):1500-1505. PubMed ID: 28314891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cones and sleeves present good survival and clinical outcome in revision total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.
    Fischer LT; Heinecke M; Röhner E; Schlattmann P; Matziolis G
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2022 Aug; 30(8):2824-2837. PubMed ID: 34389876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High survival rate at mid-term follow up of porous tantalum cones for bone defects in revision total knee replacement: A 3-11 years follow up report.
    Rossi SMP; Perticarini L; Ghiara M; Jannelli E; Cortesi L; Benazzo F
    Knee; 2022 Mar; 35():175-182. PubMed ID: 35349974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metaphyseal Fixation Using Cones and Sleeves for Severe Proximal Tibial Bone Loss.
    Zitsch BP; Salaymeh JK; Burdyny MR; Buckner BC; Lyden ER; Konigsberg BS; Garvin KL; Hartman CW
    J Arthroplasty; 2024 Aug; 39(8S1):S256-S262. PubMed ID: 38604279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Excellent mid- to long-term survival of tantalum metal cones in a case series of revision knee arthroplasty with severe bony defects.
    Eder-Halbedl M; Fink A; Pietsch M; Djahani O; Hofmann S
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Dec; 31(12):5496-5506. PubMed ID: 37819600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up.
    Kamath AF; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 25653322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.