These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32074656)

  • 41. Tantalum cones and bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Boureau F; Putman S; Arnould A; Dereudre G; Migaud H; Pasquier G
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Apr; 101(2):251-5. PubMed ID: 25755068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Porous metal cones: gold standard for massive bone loss in complex revision knee arthroplasty? A systematic review of current literature.
    Divano S; Cavagnaro L; Zanirato A; Basso M; Felli L; Formica M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2018 Jun; 138(6):851-863. PubMed ID: 29671089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Modular Augmentation in Varus-Valgus-Constrained Knee Arthroplasty-Do We Need Sleeves to Avoid Femoral Loosening After Excessive Distal Augmentation?
    Lazic I; Pohlig F; Haug AT; Suren C; Langer S; Prodinger PM
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Dec; 37(12):2394-2398. PubMed ID: 35843377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Minimum seven-year follow-up study.
    Agarwal S; Neogi DS; Morgan-Jones R
    Knee; 2018 Dec; 25(6):1299-1307. PubMed ID: 30297257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Short-Term Survivorship of 3D-Printed Titanium Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.
    Mancino F; Di Matteo V; Mocini F; Pietramala S; Singlitico A; De Fazio A; La Vergata V; Gasparini G; Maccauro G; De Martino I
    Orthop Rev (Pavia); 2022; 14(4):35891. PubMed ID: 35769657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Metaphyseal sleeves in total knee arthroplasty revision: complications, clinical and radiological results. A systematic review of the literature.
    Zanirato A; Cavagnaro L; Basso M; Divano S; Felli L; Formica M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2018 Jul; 138(7):993-1001. PubMed ID: 29845317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Outcomes After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty From a Specific, Now-Recalled Implant System.
    Puri S; Chandi S; Chiu YF; Blevins JL; Westrich GH; Figgie MP; Sculco PK; Chalmers BP; Gausden EB
    J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jun; 38(6S):S290-S296.e1. PubMed ID: 36907386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Tantalum cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. A promising short-term result with 29 cones in 21 patients.
    Villanueva-Martínez M; De la Torre-Escudero B; Rojo-Manaute JM; Ríos-Luna A; Chana-Rodriguez F
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Jun; 28(6):988-93. PubMed ID: 23414934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Cause for concern? Significant cement coverage in retrieved metaphyseal cones after revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Anatone AJ; Driscoll DA; Flevas DA; Baral EC; Chalmers BP; Sculco PK
    Knee; 2023 Dec; 45():46-53. PubMed ID: 37806245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Varus-Valgus Constrained Implants in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Mean Clinical Follow-Up of Six Years.
    Hernandez NM; Hinton ZW; Wu CJ; Wellman SS; Jiranek WA; Seyler TM
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jul; 36(7S):S303-S307. PubMed ID: 33558046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Metaphyseal cones combined with diaphyseal impaction grafting provide good outcomes and survival in a complex revision total knee arthroplasty: a matched comparative analysis.
    Dzidzishvili L; Sáez D; Calvo E
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):577-583. PubMed ID: 37656276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Porous-Coated Metaphyseal Sleeves for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Loss in Revision TKA.
    Watters TS; Martin JR; Levy DL; Yang CC; Kim RH; Dennis DA
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3468-3473. PubMed ID: 28697864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Removal of Well-Fixed Tibial Cone in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty-A Uniquely Challenging Yet Necessary Scenario.
    Scully WF; Deren ME; Sultan AA; Samuel LT; Nageotte W; Molloy RM; Krebs VE
    J Knee Surg; 2021 Jun; 34(7):693-698. PubMed ID: 31683353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Short-term effectiveness of revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal Sleeve and MBT implant].
    Guo L; Du Y; Zhang M; Sun J; Jin Z; Peng Y; Shen J; Zhou Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 33(3):302-306. PubMed ID: 30874385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Use of Cementless Metaphyseal Fixation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States.
    Carender CN; An Q; Tetreault MW; De A; Brown TS; Bedard NA
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Mar; 37(3):554-558. PubMed ID: 34843910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. 3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented and cementless stems.
    Anderson LA; Christie M; Blackburn BE; Mahan C; Earl C; Pelt CE; Peters CL; Gililland J
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):150-157. PubMed ID: 34053297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Septic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Treatment of Metaphyseal Bone Defects Using Metaphyseal Sleeves.
    Klim SM; Amerstorfer F; Bernhardt GA; Sadoghi P; Gruber G; Radl R; Leithner A; Glehr M
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Dec; 33(12):3734-3738. PubMed ID: 30224100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Tantalum Cementless Versus Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis of Level 1 Studies.
    Peddada KV; Delman CM; Holland CT; Meehan JP; Lum ZC
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev; 2023 Apr; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 37027225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Tantalum cones for major osteolysis in revision knee replacement.
    Rao BM; Kamal TT; Vafaye J; Moss M
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Aug; 95-B(8):1069-74. PubMed ID: 23908422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty are Reliable for Fixation at Mean 5-Year Follow-Up.
    Kayani B; Howard LC; Neufeld ME; Greidanus NV; Masri BA; Garbuz DS
    J Arthroplasty; 2024 Sep; 39(9S2):S374-S379. PubMed ID: 38508344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.